Postcolonial approaches to communication: Charting the terrain, engaging the intersections

Communication Theory

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 249-270

  Shome, Raka ^a   Hegde, Radha S ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; POST-COLONIALISM;

EID: 0036960415     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00269.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Ahmad, A. (1992). In theory: Classes, nation, literatures. New York: Verso.
2. Appadurai, A. (2000). Grassroots globalization and the research imagination. Public Culture, 12, 1-19.
3. Barlow, T. (1997). Introduction: On colonial modernity. In T. Barlow (Ed.), Formations of colonial modernity (pp. 1-20). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4. Bhabha, H. (1990). The third space. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 90-118), London: Lawrence & Wishart.
5. Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.
6. Butler, J. (1999, March 20). A "bad writer" bites back. The New York Times, p. A15.
7. Chakraborty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Chow, R. (1991). Violence in the other country: China as crisis, spectacle, and woman. In C. Mohanty, A. Russo, & L. Torres (Eds.), Third world women and the politics of fiminism (pp. 81-100). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9. Chow, R. (1992). Postmodern automatons. In J. Butler & J. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 101-120). New York: Routledge
10. Chow, R. (1993). Writing diaspora: Tactics of intervention in contemporary cultural studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11. Christian, B. (1990). The race for theory. In A. JanMohamed & D. Lloyd (Eds.), The nature and context of minority discourse (pp. 37-49). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Dirlik, A. (1997). The postcolonial aura: Third world criticism in the age of multinational capital. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
13. Dirlik, A. (2000). Postmodernity's histories: The past as legacy and project. Lanham, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
14. Flax, J. (1992). The end of innocence. In J. Scott & J. Butler (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 445-463). New York: Routledge.
15. Gaonkar, D. (1999). On alternative modernities. In D. Gaonkar (Ed.), Alternative modernities (pp.1-18). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
16. Gilroy, P. (1993). The Black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Giroux, H. A. (1992). Post-colonial ruptures and democratic possibilities: Multiculturalism as antiracist pedagogy. Cultural critique, 21, 5-39.
18. Grewal, I., & Kaplan, C. (Eds.). (1994). Scattered hegemonies: Postmodernity and transnational feminist practices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19. Grossberg, L. (1982). The ideology of communication: Post-structuralism and the limits of communication. Man and World, 15, 83-101.
20. Grossberg, L. (1997). Bringing it all back home. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21. Gupta, A. Postcolonial developments: Agriculture in the making of modern India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
22. Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222-237). London: Lawrence & Wishart.
23. Hall, S. (1992). Cultural studies and its theoretical legacies. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 277-286). New York: Routledge.
24. Hall, S. (1996). When was the post-colonial? Thinking at the limit. In I. Chambers & L. Curti (Eds.), The post-colonial question: Common skies, divided horizons (pp. 242-260). New York: Routledge.
25. Hardt, H., & Brennen, B. (1993). Communication and the question of history. Communication Theory, 3, 130-136.
26. Harootunian, H. (2000). History's disquiet: Modernity, cultural practice, and the question of everyday life. New York: Columbia University Press.
27. Iyer, P. (1989). Video nights in Kathmandu. London: Black Swan.
28. Jameson, F. (1999). Preface. In F. Jameson & M. Miyoshi (Eds.), The cultures of globalization (pp.xi-xvii). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
29. Kureshi, H. (1996). My son the fanatic. In I. Chambers & L. Curti (Eds.), The post-colonial question: Common skies, divided horizons (pp. 228-241). New York: Routledge.
30. Mani, L. (1999). Contentious traditions. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31. McClintock, A. (1995). Imperial leather: Race, gender and sexuality in the colonial context. New York: Routledge.
32. Mercer, K. (1994). Welcome to the jungle: New positions in black cultural studies. New York: Routledge.
33. Mignolo, W. (1995a). The darker side of resistance: Literacy, territoriality and colonization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
34. Mignolo, W. (1995b). Afterword, human understanding, and Latin American interests. Poetics Today, 16, 171-214.
35. Mignolo, W. (2000). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36. Minh-ha, T. (1986). Difference: A special third world women's issue. Discourse, 8, 11-37.
37. Minh-ha, T. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
38. Mitchell, T. (2000). Introduction. In T. Mitchell (Ed.), Questions of modernity (pp. 1-18). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
39. Mohanty, C. T. (1991). Cartographies of struggle: Third world women and the politics of feminism. In C. T. Mohanty, A. Russo, & L. Torres (Eds.), Third world women and the politics of feminism (pp. 1-47). Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
40. Mohanty, C. T. (1994). On race and voice: Challenges for liberal education in the 1990s. In H. A. Giroux & P. McLaren (Eds.), Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies (pp. 145-166). New York: Routledge.
41. Mohanty, C. T. (1996). Women workers and capitalist scripts. In J. Alexander & C. Mohanty (Eds.), Feminist genealogies, colonial legacies, and democratic futures (pp. 3-30). New York: Routledge.
42. Nelson, C., & Gaonkar, D. (Eds.). (1996). Disciplinarity and dissent in cultural studies. New York: Routledge.
43. O'Hanlon, R., & Washbrook, D. (1992) After Orientalism: Culture, criticism and politics in the Third World. Comparative studies in history and society, 34, 141-167.
44. Ong, A. (1999). Flexible citizenship. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45. Radhakrishnan, R. (2000). Postmodernism and the rest of the world. In F. Afzal-Khan & K. Seshadri-Crooks (Eds.), The pre-occupation of postcolonial studies (pp. 37-70). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
46. Rafael, V. (2000). White love. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
47. Rouse, R. (1995). Thinking through transnationalism: Notes on the cultural politics of class relations in the contemporary United States. Public Culture, 7, 353-402.
48. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Random House.
49. San Juan, E. (1995). On the limits of postcolonial theory: Trespassing letters from the third orld. Ariel, 26, 89-116.
50. San Juan, E. (1996). The Philippine temptation: Dialectics of Philippines-United States literary relations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
51. San Juan, E. (1999). Beyond postcolonial theory. New York: St. Martin's Press.
52. Schwarz, H. (2000). Mission impossible: Introducing postcolonial studies in the U.S. academy. In H. Schwarz & S. Ray (Eds.), A companion to postcolonial studies (pp. 1-20). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
53. Seshadri-Crooks, K. (2000). At the margins of postcolonial studies: Part I. In F. Afzal-Khan & K. Seshadri-Crooks (Eds.), The pre-occupation of postcolonial studies (pp. 3-23). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
54. Sharpe, J. (1993). Allegories of empire: The figure of woman in the colonial text. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
55. Shohat, E. (1992). Notes on the post-colonial. Social Text, 31/32, 99-113.
56. Spivak, G. C. (1985). Three women's texts and a critique of imperialism. In H. L. Gates (Ed.), Race, writing and difference (pp. 262-280). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57. Spivak, G. C. (1988a). Can the subaltern speak? In L. Grossberg & C. Nelson (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
58. Spivak, G. C. (1988b). In other worlds. New York: Routledge.
59. Spivak, G. C. (1990). The postcolonial critic. New York: Routledge.
60. Spivak, G. C. (1992). French feminism revisited: Ethics and politics. In J. Butler & J. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 54-85). New York: Routledge.
61. Spivak, G. C. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. New York: Routledge.
62. Spivak, G. C. (2000). A critique of postcolonial reason. Boston: Harvard University Press.
63. Visweswaran, K. (1994). Fictions of fiminist ethnography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.