Lineage tracing of stem and progenitor cells of the murine corneal epithelium

Stem Cells

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 230-239

  Amitai Lange, Aya ^a   Altshuler, Anna ^a   Bubley, Jeffrey ^a   Dbayat, Noora ^b   Tiosano, Beatrice ^b   Shalom Feuerstein, Ruby ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b HILLEL YAFFE MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cornea; Limbal stem cells; Limbus; Lineage tracing; Stem cells

Indexed keywords

CYTOKERATIN 14;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL LINEAGE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; CORNEA INJURY; CORNEA OPACITY; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE TEST; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; STEM CELL; STEM CELL NICHE; WOUND HEALING; ANIMAL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL MOTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOLOGY; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

MURINAE; MUS;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL PROLIFERATION; EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL; MICE; STEM CELLS;

EID: 84919457969     PISSN: 10665099     EISSN: 15494918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stem.1840     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Cotsarelis G, Cheng SZ, Dong G, et al. Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate-Implications on epithelial stem-cells. Cell 1989; 57: 201-209.
2. Davanger M, Evensen A,. Role of the pericorneal papillary structure in renewal of corneal epithelium. Nature 1971; 229: 560-561.
3. Lavker RM, Tseng SC, Sun TT,. Corneal epithelial stem cells at the limbus: Looking at some old problems from a new angle. Exp Eye Res 2004; 78: 433-446.
4. O'Callaghan AR, Daniels JT,. Concise review: Limbal epithelial stem cell therapy: Controversies and challenges. Stem Cells 2011; 29: 1923-1932.
5. Pellegrini G, Traverso CE, Franzi AT, et al. Long-term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologous cultivated corneal epithelium. Lancet 1997; 349: 990-993.
6. Budak MT, Alpdogan OS, Zhou M, et al. Ocular surface epithelia contain ABCG2-dependent side population cells exhibiting features associated with stem cells. J Cell Sci 2005; 118: 1715-1724.
7. de Paiva CS, Chen Z, Corrales RM, et al. ABCG2 transporter identifies a population of clonogenic human limbal epithelial cells. Stem Cells 2005; 23: 63-73.
8. Umemoto T, Yamato M, Nishida K, et al. Limbal epithelial side-population cells have stem cell-like properties, including quiescent state. Stem Cells 2006; 24: 86-94.
9. Barbaro V, Testa A, Di Iorio E, et al. C/EBPdelta regulates cell cycle and self-renewal of human limbal stem cells. J Cell Biol 2007; 177: 1037-1049.
10. Chen Z, de Paiva CS, Luo L, et al. Characterization of putative stem cell phenotype in human limbal epithelia. Stem Cells 2004; 22: 355-366.
11. Yoshida S, Shimmura S, Kawakita T, et al. Cytokeratin 15 can be used to identify the limbal phenotype in normal and diseased ocular surfaces. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 4780-4786.
12. Chaloin-Dufau C, Sun TT, Dhouailly D,. Appearance of the keratin pair K3/K12 during embryonic and adult corneal epithelial differentiation in the chick and in the rabbit. Cell Differ Dev 1990; 32: 97-108.
13. Schermer A, Galvin S, Sun TT,. Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells. J Cell Biol 1986; 103: 49-62.
14. Thoft RA, Friend J,. The X, Y, Z hypothesis of corneal epithelial maintenance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983; 24: 1442-1443.
15. Buck RC,. Measurement of centripetal migration of normal corneal epithelial cells in the mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985; 26: 1296-1299.
16. Collinson JM, Morris L, Reid AI, et al. Clonal analysis of patterns of growth, stem cell activity, and cell movement during the development and maintenance of the murine corneal epithelium. Dev Dyn 2002; 224: 432-440.
17. Nagasaki T, Zhao J,. Centripetal movement of corneal epithelial cells in the normal adult mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 558-566.
18. Huang AJW, Tseng SCG,. Corneal epithelial wound-healing in the absence of limbal epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32: 96-105.
19. Ebato B, Friend J, Thoft RA,. Comparison of central and peripheral human corneal epithelium in tissue culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 1450-1456.
20. Ebato B, Friend J, Thoft RA,. Comparison of limbal and peripheral human corneal epithelium in tissue culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988; 29: 1533-1537.
21. Lavker RM, Dong G, Cheng SZ, et al. Relative proliferative rates of limbal and corneal epithelia. Implications of corneal epithelial migration, circadian rhythm, and suprabasally located DNA-synthesizing keratinocytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32: 1864-1875.
22. Pellegrini G, Golisano O, Paterna P, et al. Location and clonal analysis of stem cells and their differentiated progeny in the human ocular surface. J Cell Biol 1999; 145: 769-782.
23. Kenyon KR, Tseng SC,. Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 1989; 96: 709-722; discussion 722-703.
24. Tsai RJ, Li LM, Chen JK,. Reconstruction of damaged corneas by transplantation of autologous limbal epithelial cells. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 86-93.
25. Majo F, Rochat A, Nicolas M, et al. Oligopotent stem cells are distributed throughout the mammalian ocular surface. Nature 2008; 456: 250-254.
26. Cenedella RJ, Fleschner CR,. Kinetics of corneal epithelium turnover in vivo. Studies of lovastatin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990; 31: 1957-1962.
27. Haddad A,. Renewal of the rabbit corneal epithelium as investigated by autoradiography after intravitreal injection of 3H-thymidine. Cornea 2000; 19: 378-383.
28. Lagali N, Stenevi U, Claesson M, et al. Survival of donor-derived cells in human corneal transplants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 2673-2678.
29. Catanese M, Popovici C, Proust H, et al. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on corneal impression cytology specimens (CICS): Study of epithelial cell survival after keratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 1009-1013.
30. Kinoshita S, Friend J, Thoft RA,. Sex chromatin of donor corneal epithelium in rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 21: 434-441.
31. Shalom-Feuerstein R, Lena AM, Zhou H, et al. DeltaNp63 is an ectodermal gatekeeper of epidermal morphogenesis. Cell Death Differ 2011; 18: 887-896.
32. Shalom-Feuerstein R, Serror L, De La Forest Divonne S, et al. Pluripotent stem cell model reveals essential roles for miR-450b-5p and miR-184 in embryonic corneal lineage specification. Stem Cells 2012; 30: 898-909.
33. Snippert HJ, van der Flier LG, Sato T, et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 2010; 143: 134-144.
34. Tanifuji-Terai N, Terai K, Hayashi Y, et al. Expression of keratin 12 and maturation of corneal epithelium during development and postnatal growth. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 545-551.
35. Vauclair S, Majo F, Durham AD, et al. Corneal epithelial cell fate is maintained during repair by Notch1 signaling via the regulation of vitamin A metabolism. Dev Cell 2007; 13: 242-253.
36. Singh P, Chen C, Pal-Ghosh S, et al. Loss of integrin alpha9beta1 results in defects in proliferation, causing poor re-epithelialization during cutaneous wound healing. J Invest Dermatol 2009; 129: 217-228.
37. Livet J, Weissman TA, Kang H, et al. Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. Nature 2007; 450: 56-62.
38. Khodadoust AA, Silverstein AM,. The survival and rejection of epithelium in experimental corneal transplants. Invest Ophthalmol 1969; 8: 169-179.
39. Egarth M, Hellkvist J, Claesson M, et al. Longterm survival of transplanted human corneal epithelial cells and corneal stem cells. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005; 83: 637-637.
40. Wollensak G, Green WR,. Analysis of sex-mismatched human corneal transplants by fluorescence in situ hybridization of the sex-chromosomes. Exp Eye Res 1999; 68: 341-346.
41. Pan YA, Freundlich T, Weissman TA, et al. Zebrabow: Multispectral cell labeling for cell tracing and lineage analysis in zebrafish. Development 2013; 140: 2835-2846.
42. Davies SB, Chui J, Madigan MC, et al. Stem cell activity in the developing human cornea. Stem Cells 2009; 27: 2781-2792.
43. Shortt AJ, Secker GA, Munro PM, et al. Characterization of the limbal epithelial stem cell niche: Novel imaging techniques permit in vivo observation and targeted biopsy of limbal epithelial stem cells. Stem Cells 2007; 25: 1402-1409.
44. Waring GO, 3rd, Roth AM, Ekins MB,. Clinical and pathologic description of 17 cases of corneal intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Ophthalmol 1984; 97: 547-559.
45. Lehrer MS, Sun TT, Lavker RM,. Strategies of epithelial repair: Modulation of stem cell and transit amplifying cell proliferation. J Cell Sci 1998; 111: 2867-2875.
46. Pal-Ghosh S, Pajoohesh-Ganji A, Brown M, et al. A mouse model for the study of recurrent corneal epithelial erosions: Alpha9beta1 integrin implicated in progression of the disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 1775-1788.