Radiographical and clinical evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion: Effects of cage size and instrumentation type with a minimum of 1-year follow-up

Spine

Volumn 39, Issue 26, 2014, Pages E1582-E1591

  Tohmeh, Antoine G ^a   Khorsand, Derek ^b   Watson, Blake ^c   Zielinski, Xavier ^c  

^a School of Medicine ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Inland Imaging   (United States)

Author keywords

Cage subsidence; Clinical outcomes; Extreme lateral interbody fusion; Intervertebral cage settling; Lateral; Radiographical outcomes; XLIF

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAGE BREAKAGE; CAGE MIGRATION; CELLULITIS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; EXTREME LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL BODY FUSION DEVICE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISEASE; LEG PAIN; LORDOSIS; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION DEVICE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PLATE FIXATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSEUDARTHROSIS; PSEUDOMEMBRANOUS COLITIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK REDUCTION; SPINE FUSION; SPINE PLATE; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL PATIENT;

EID: 84919421803     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000645     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Beutler WJ, Peppelman WC Jr. Anterior lumbar fusion with paired BAK standard and paired BAK Proximity cages: subsidence incidence, subsidence factors, and clinical outcome. Spine J 2003; 3: 289-93.
2. Le TV, Baaj AA, Dakwar E, et al. Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2012; 37: 1268-73.
3. Marchi L, Abdala N, Oliveira L, et al. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-Alone lateral interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2013; 19: 110-8.
4. Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Rodgers JA. Lumbar fusion in octogenarians: the promise of minimally invasive surgery. Spine 2010; 35: S355-60.
5. Lucio JC, Vanconia RB, Deluzio KJ, et al. Economics of less invasive spinal surgery: an analysis of hospital cost differences between open and minimally invasive instrumented spinal fusion procedures during the perioperative period. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2012; 5: 65-74.
6. Smith WD, Christian G, Serrano S, et al. A comparison of perioperative charges and outcome between open and mini-open approaches for anterior lumbar discectomy and fusion. J Clin Neurosci 2012; 19: 673-80.
7. Oliveira L, Marchi L, Coutinho E, et al. A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. Spine 2010; 35: S331-7.
8. Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA, et al. Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine 2010; 35: S302-11.
9. Cappuccino A, Cornwall GB, Turner AW, et al. Biomechanical analysis and review of lateral lumbar fusion constructs. Spine 2010; 35: S361-7.
10. Tohmeh AG, Watson B, Tohmeh M, et al. Allograft cellular bone matrix in extreme lateral interbody fusion: preliminary radiographic and clinical outcomes. ScientificWorldJournal 2012; 2012: 263637.
11. Wall BF, Hart D. Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board. Br J Radiol 1997; 70: 437-9.
12. Tokuhashi Y, Ajiro Y, Umezawa N. Subsidence of metal interbody cage after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fi xation. Orthopedics 2009; 32: 259-64.
13. Choi JY, Sung KH. Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-Alone rectangular cages. Eur Spine J 2006; 15: 16-22.
14. Kim MC, Chung HT, Cho JL, et al. Subsidence of polyetheretherketone cage after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013; 26: 87-92.
15. Grant JP, Oxland TR, Dvorak MF. Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates. Spine 2001; 26: 889-96.
16. Goh JC, Wong HK, Thambyah A, et al. Infl uence of PLIF cage size on lumbar spine stability. Spine 2000; 25: 35-9.
17. Hou Y, Luo Z. A study on the structural properties of the lumbar endplate: histological structure, the effect of bone density, and spinal level. Spine 2009; 34: E427-33.
18. Inceoglu S, Ferrara L, McLain RF. Pedicle screw fi xation strength: pullout versus insertional torque. Spine J 2004; 4: 513-8.
19. Eck KR, Bridwell KH, Ungacta FF, et al. Analysis of titanium mesh cages in adults with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine 2000; 25: 2407-15.