Biomechanical analysis and review of lateral lumbar fusion constructs

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue SUPPL. 26S, 2010, Pages

  Cappuccino, Andrew ^a   Cornwall, G Bryan ^b   Turner, Alexander W L ^b   Fogel, Guy R ^c   Duong, Huy T ^d   Kim, Kee D ^d   Brodke, Darrel S ^e  

^a Buffalo Spine Surgery   (United States)

^b NuVasive Inc   (United States)

^c Orthopaedic Spine Institute   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

extreme lateral; lumbar interbody fusion; range of motion; stability; XLIF

Indexed keywords

BONE SCREW; HUMAN; JOINT LIMITATION; KINEMATICS; LUMBAR SPINE; MECHANICS; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REVIEW; SPINE FUSION;

ADULT; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCREWS; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; PLIABILITY; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINAL FUSION; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 78650929361     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318202308b     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Hansson T, Hansson E, Malchau H. Utility of spine surgery: a comparison of common elective orthopaedic surgical procedures. Spine 2008;33:2819-30.
2. Fraser RD. Interbody, posterior, and combined lumbar fusions. Spine 1995; 20(suppl 24):167S-77S.
3. Madan S, Boeree NR. Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine 2002;27: 1536-42.
4. Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwiebe EG, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:337-46.
5. Scaduto AA, Gamradt SC, Yu WD, et al. Perioperative complications of threaded cylindrical lumbar interbody fusion devices: anterior versus posterior approach. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:502-7.
6. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, et al. Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:92-7.
7. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2: histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine 1994;19:2598-602. (Pubitemid 24356465)
8. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 1: histologic and histochemical analyses in rats. Spine 1994;19:2590-7. (Pubitemid 24356464)
9. Baker JK, Reardon PR, Reardon MJ, et al. Vascular injury in anterior lumbar surgery. Spine 1993;18:2227-30.
10. Rajaraman V, Vingan R, Roth P, et al. Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg 1999;91(suppl 1):60-4.
11. Rihn JA, Patel R, Makda J, et al. Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2009;9:623-9.
12. Sasso RC, Kenneth BJ, LeHuec JC. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure. Spine 2003;28:1023-6.
13. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, et al. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2006;6:435-43.
14. Pimenta L, Schaffa TL. Surgical technique: extreme lateral interbody fusion. In: Goodrich JA, Volcan IJ, eds. eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF). St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2008:87-104.
15. Billinghurst J, Akbarnia BA. Extreme lateral interbody fusion-XLIF. Curr Orthop Pract 2009;20:238-51.
16. Slucky AV, Brodke DS, Bachus KN, et al. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis. Spine J 2006;6:78-85.
17. Anjarwalla NK, Morcom RK, Fraser RD. Supplementary stabilization with anterior lumbar intervertebral fusion - a radiologic review. Spine 2006;31: 1281-7.
18. Beringer WF, Mobasser JP. Unilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 2006;20:E4.
19. Deutsch H, Musacchio MJ Jr. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. Neurosurg Focus 2006;20:E10.
20. Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Patterson JR. Fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography. SAS J 2010;1:63-6.
21. Suk KS, Lee HM, Kim NH, et al. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine 2000;25:1843-7
22. Aryan HE, Lu DC, Acosta FL Jr, et al. Stand-alone anterior lumbar discectomy and fusion with plate: initial experience. Surg Neurol 2007;68:7-13.
23. Aunoble S, Hoste D, Donkersloot P, et al. Video-assisted ALIF with cage and anterior plate fixation for L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:471-6.
24. Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, et al. Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 2010;28:E8.
25. Bess RS, Cornwall GB, Vance RE, et al. Biomechanics of Lateral Arthrodesis. In: Goodrich JA, Volcan IJ, eds. eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF). St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2008:31-40.
26. Panjabi MM. Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: part I. A conceptual framework. Spine 1988;13:1129-34.
27. Wilke HJ, Wenger K, Claes L. Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Eur Spine J 1998;7:148-54.
28. Beaubien BP, Derincek A, Lew WD, et al. In vitro, biomechanical comparison of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anteriorly placed, low-profile lumbar plate and posteriorly placed pedicle screws or translaminar screws. Spine 2005;30:1846-51.
29. Harris BM, Hilibrand AS, Savas PE, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 2004;29:E65-70.
30. Tsantrizos A, Andreou A, Aebi M, et al. Biomechanical stability of five stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion constructs. Eur Spine J 2000; 9:14-22.
31. Niemeyer TK, Koriller M, Claes L, et al. In vitro study of biomechanical behavior of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody instrumentation techniques. Neurosurgery 2006;59:1271-6.
32. Heth JA, Hitchon PW, Goel VK, et al. A biomechanical comparison between anterior and transverse interbody fusion cages. Spine 2001;26:E261-7.
33. Le Huec JC, Liu M, Skalli W, et al. Lumbar lateral interbody cage with plate augmentation: in vitro biomechanical analysis. Eur Spine J 2002;11:130-6.
34. Tencer AF, Hampton D, Eddy S. Biomechanical properties of threaded inserts for lumbar interbody spinal fusion. Spine 1995;20:2408-14.
35. Ploumis A, Wu C, Fischer G, et al. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:120-5.
36. Kim SM, Lim TJ, Paterno J, et al. Biomechanical comparison: stability of lateral-approach anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral fixation compared with anterior-approach anterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation in the lower lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;2:62-8.
37. Panjabi MM. Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007;22:257-65.