Subsidence of polyetheretherketone cage after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 87-92

  Kim, Moon Chan ^a   Chung, Hung Tae ^a   Cho, Jae Lim ^a   Kim, Dong Jun ^a   Chung, Nam Su ^b  

^a Bumin Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Ajou University Medical CentSuwon   (South Korea)

Author keywords

interbody cage; minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; polyetheretherketone; risk factor; subsidence

Indexed keywords

POLYETHERETHERKETONE; POLYETHERETHERKETONE CAGE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BACK MUSCLE; BODY MASS; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; KETONES; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84876100511     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: 15392465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318237b9b1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Holly LT, Schwender JD, Rouben DP, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications. Neurosurg Focus. 2006;20:E6.
2. Ozgur BM, Yoo K, Rodriguez G, et al. Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Eur Spine J. 2005;14:887-894. (Pubitemid 41789828)
3. Foley KT, Gupta SK. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg. 2002;97: S7-S12.
4. Hackenberg L, Halm H, Bullmann V, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:551-558. (Pubitemid 41159462)
5. Steffen T, Tsantrizos A, Fruth I, et al. Cages: designs and concepts. Eur Spine J. 2000;9:S89-S94.
6. Polikeit A, Ferguson SJ, Nolte LP, et al. The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:556-561. (Pubitemid 38096058)
7. Kader DF, Wardlaw D, Smith FW. Correlation between the MRI changes in the lumbar multifidus muscles and leg pain. Clin Radiol. 2000;55:145-149. (Pubitemid 32054539)
8. Ishihara H, Osada R, Kanamori M, et al. Minimum 10-year followup study of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2001;14:91-99. (Pubitemid 32274097)
9. Beutler WJ, Peppelman WC Jr. Anterior lumbar fusion with paired BAK standard and paired BAK Proximity cages: subsidence incidence, subsidence factors, and clinical outcome. Spine J. 2003;3:289-293. (Pubitemid 38351738)
10. Lee JH, Jeon DW, Lee SJ, et al. Fusion rates and subsidence of morselized local bone grafted in titanium cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion using quantitative three-dimensional computed tomography scans. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:1460-1465.
11. Tokuhashi Y, Ajiro Y, Umezawa N. Subsidence of metal interbody cage after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation. Orthopedics. 2009;32:32-34.
12. Choi JY, Sung KH. Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:16-22. (Pubitemid 43199169)
13. Chen L, Yang H, Tang T. Cage migration in spondylolisthesis treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using BAK cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:2171-2175. (Pubitemid 41429196)
14. Kulkarni AG, Hee HT, Wong HK. Solis cage (PEEK) for anterior cervical fusion: preliminary radiological results with emphasis on fusion and subsidence. Spine J. 2007;7:205-209.
15. Ha SK, Park JY, Kim SH, et al. Radiologic assessment of subsidence in stand-alone cervical polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008;44:370-374.
16. Wenz LM, Merritt K, Brown SA, et al. In vitro biocompatibility of polyetheretherketone and polysulfone composites. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990;24:207-215. (Pubitemid 20123724)
17. Schizas C, Tzinieris N, Tsiridis E, et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1683-1688.
18. Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9: 560-565.
19. Wu RH, Fraser JF, Hartl R. Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: meta-analysis of fusion rates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:2273-2281.