Validation of the SF-36 as a measure of postoperative recovery after colorectal surgery

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 28, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 3168-3178

  Antonescu, Ioana ^a   Carli, Francesco ^a   Mayo, Nancy E ^a   Feldman, Liane S ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Colorectal surgery; Postoperative recovery; Responsiveness; SF 36; Validity evidence

Indexed keywords

6 MINUTE WALK TEST; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLORECTAL SURGERY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHORT FORM 36; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION STUDY; WALKING; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; COLONIC DISEASES; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECTAL DISEASES; REHABILITATION;

ADULT; AGED; COLONIC DISEASES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECTAL DISEASES; WALKING;

EID: 84919391735     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3577-8     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. CIHI. Trends in acute inpatient hospitalizations and day surgery visits in Canada, 1995–1996 to 2005–2006. Updated January 2007; September 2012. http://www.cihi.ca/CIHI-ext-portal/pdf/internet/BUL_10JAN07_FIG1_EN
2. Cheema FN, Abraham NS, Berger DH, Albo D, Taffet GE, Naik AD (2011) Novel approaches to perioperative assessment and intervention may improve long-term outcomes after colorectal cancer resection in older adults. Ann Surg 253(5):867–874
3. Colavita PD, Tsirline VB, Belyansky I, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Sing RF et al (2012) Prospective, long-term comparison of quality of life in laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg 256(5):714–722 Discussion 22–3
4. Soper NJ, Brunt LM, Kerbl K (1994) Laparoscopic general surgery. N Engl J Med 330(6):409–419
5. Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M (2013) Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc 27(7):2253–2257
6. Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S et al (2013) Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg 37(12):2782–2790
7. Fierens J, Wolthuis AM, Penninckx F, D’Hoore A (2012) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol: prospective study of outcome in colorectal surgery. Acta Chir Belg 112(5):355–358
8. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360(5):491–499
9. Lee L, Tran T, Mayo NE, Carli F, Feldman LS (2014) What does it really mean to “recover from an operation”? Surgery 155(2):211–216
10. Carli F, Zavorsky GS (2005) Optimizing functional exercise capacity in the elderly surgical population. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 8(1):23–32
11. Kluivers KB, Riphagen I, Vierhout ME, Brolmann HA, de Vet HC (2008) Systematic review on recovery specific quality-of-life instruments. Surgery 143(2):206–215
12. Ferrans CE, Zerwic JJ, Wilbur JE, Larson JL (2005) Conceptual model of health-related quality of life. J Nurs Sch 37(4):336–342
13. Wilson IB, Cleary PD (1995) Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. J Am Med Assoc 273(1):59–65
14. Velanovich V (2001) The quality of quality of life studies in general surgical journals. J Am Coll Surg 193(3):288–296
15. Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T et al (1992) Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 305(6846):160–164
16. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483
17. Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinee S, Abbou CC, Eypasch E, Caballero MG et al (2004) Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 18(6):879–897
18. Avery KN, Gujral S, Blazeby JM (2008) Patient-reported outcomes to evaluate surgery. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 8(1):43–50
19. Beaton DE, Boers M, Wells GA (2002) Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research. Curr Opin Rheumatol 14(2):109–114
20. Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR (2003) Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 56(5):395–407
21. Urbach DR (2005) Measuring quality of life after surgery. Surg Innov 12(2):161–165
22. Velanovich V (2007) Using quality-of-life measurements in clinical practice. Surgery 141(2):127–133
23. Wongyingsinn M, Baldini G, Charlebois P, Liberman S, Stein B, Carli F (2011) Intravenous lidocaine versus thoracic epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery using an enhanced recovery program. Reg Anesth Pain Med 36(3):241–248
24. Wongyingsinn M, Baldini G, Stein B, Charlebois P, Liberman S, Carli F (2012) Spinal analgesia for laparoscopic colonic resection using an enhanced recovery after surgery programme: better analgesia, but no benefits on postoperative recovery: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 108(5):850–856
25. Moriello C, Mayo NE, Feldman L, Carli F (2008) Validating the 6-min walk test as a measure of recovery after elective colon resection surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89(6):1083–1089
26. Tarlov AR, Ware JE Jr, Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M (1989) The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. J Am Med Assoc 262(7):925–930
27. Laboratories ATSCoPSfCPF (2002) ATS statement: guidelines for the 6-min walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166(1):111–117
28. Feldman LS, Kaneva P, Demyttenaere S, Carli F, Fried GM, Mayo NE (2009) Validation of a physical activity questionnaire (CHAMPS) as an indicator of postoperative recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 146(1):31–39
29. White EAB, Saracci R (2008) Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology. Oxford University Press, London
30. Hopman WM, Towheed T, Anastassiades T, Tenenhouse A, Poliquin S, Berger C et al (2008) Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group. Can Med Assoc J 163(3):265–271
31. Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW Jr, Schuler TC (2007) Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J 7(5):541–546
32. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH (1989) Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10(4):407–415
33. Antonescu I, Scott S, Tran TT, Mayo NE, Feldman LS (2014) Measuring postoperative recovery: what are clinically meaningful differences? Surgery. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.005
34. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213
35. Dowson H, Cowie A, Ballard K, Gage H, Rockall T (2008) Systematic review of quality of life following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01603.x
36. Busija L, Osborne RH, Nilsdotter A, Buchbinder R, Roos EM (2008) Magnitude and meaningfulness of change in SF-36 scores in four types of orthopedic surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:55
37. Grevitt M, Khazim R, Webb J, Mulholland R, Shepperd J (1997) The short form-36 health survey questionnaire in spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(1):48–52
38. Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, van Duijvendijk P, Gouma DJ (2001) Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 44(12):1800–1807
39. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ, van Deventer SJ et al (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 240(6):984–991 Discussion 91–2
40. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Pierik EG, Gouma DJ et al (2006) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 243(2):143–149 Discussion 50–3
41. Andersen MH, Mathisen L, Veenstra M, Oyen O, Edwin B, Digernes R et al (2007) Quality of life after randomization to laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy: long-term follow-up. Transplantation 84(1):64–69
42. Urbach DR (2002) Laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colon cancer. J Am Med Assoc 287(15):1938 Author reply 9
43. Urbach DR, Harnish JL, McIlroy JH, Streiner DL (2006) A measure of quality of life after abdominal surgery. Qual Life Res 15(6):1053–1061
44. Gervaz P, Mugnier-Konrad B, Morel P, Huber O, Inan I (2011) Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: long-term results of a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc 25(10):3373–3378
45. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short-term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 3:CD003145