A randomized five-year clinical study of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 757-763

  Can Say, Esra ^a   Yurdaguven, Haktan ^a   Ozel, Emre ^b   Soyman, Mubin ^a  

^a YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b KOCAELI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Clinical evaluation; Enamel etching; Non carious cervical sclerotic lesions; Two step self etch adhesive; USPHS criteria

Indexed keywords

ENAMELS; RESTORATION;

CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PERFORMANCE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION; NON-CARIOUS CERVICAL SCLEROTIC LESIONS; RESIN COMPOSITES; SECONDARY CARIES; SELF-ETCH ADHESIVES; USPHS CRITERIA;

ETCHING;

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ADHESE CEMENT;

CHEMISTRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL RESTORATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ACRYLIC RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84919387199     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: 18811361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2014-106     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 90-101.
2. El-Deeb HA, Al Sherbiney HH, Mobarak EH. Bond durability of adhesives containing modified-monomer with/withoutfluoride after aging in artificial saliva and under intrapulpal pressure simulation. Oper Dent 2013; 38: 48-56.
3. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 1176-1184.
4. van Dijken JWV. A prospective 8-year evaluation of a mild two-step self-etching adhesive and a heavily filled two-step etch-and-rinse system in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 940-946.
5. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A. Relationship between bond strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e100-121.
6. Heintze SD, Thunpithayakul C, Armstrong SR, Rousson V. Correlation between microtensile bond strength data and clinical outcome of cervical restorations. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 114-125.
7. Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 72-86.
8. Bayne SC. Correlation of clinical performance with 'in vitro tests' of restorative dental materials that use polymer-based matrices. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 52-71.
9. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Duarte S Jr, Lopes MM. Enamel bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacturer. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 492-499.
10. Lührs AK, Guhr S, Schilke R, Borchers L, Geurtsen W, Günay H. Shear bond strength of self-etch adhesives to enamel with additional phosphoric acid etching. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 155- 162.
11. Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: A comparison of self-etching and etchand- rinse adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1459-1467.
12. Loguercio AD, Moura SK, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Patzlaff RT, Grande RH, Reis A. Durability of enamel bonding using two-step self-etch systems on ground and unground enamel. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 79-88.
13. Nazari A, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Tagami J. Pre-etching vs. grinding in promotion of adhesion to intact enamel using selfetch adhesives. Dent Mater J 2012; 31: 394-400.
14. Abdalla Ali A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical performance of a selfetch adhesive in Class V restorations made with and without acid etching. J Dent 2007; 35: 558-563.
15. Fron H, Vergnes JN, Moussally C, Cazier S, Simon AL, Chieze JB, Savard G, Tirlet G, Attal JP. Effectiveness of a new onestep self-etch adhesive in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: 2-year results of a randomized controlled practice-based study. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 304-312.
16. Ermis RB, Temel UB, Cellik EU, Kam O. Clinical performance of a two-step self-etch adhesive with additional enamel etching in Class III cavities. Oper Dent 2010; 35: 147-155.
17. Heymann HO, Bayne SC. Current concepts in dentine bonding: focusing on dentinal adhesion factors. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124: 26-36.
18. Can Sey E, Özel E, Yurdagüver H, Soyman M. Three-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 1427-1433.
19. Ryge G, Cvar JF. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. US Dental Health Center. San Francisco: US Government Printing Office.1971 Publication No. 7902244.
20. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Acceptance program guidelines: Dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Chicago: American Dental Association; 2001.
21. Van Dijken JW. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentine lesions. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 27-32.
22. Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 370-378.
23. Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Ermis RB, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 1045-1052.
24. Martins GC, Sánchez-Ayala A, D'Alpino PH, Calixto AL, Gomes JC, Gomes OM. Interfacial integrity of bonded restorations with self-etching adhesives: Water storage and thermo-mechanical cycling. Eur J Dent 2012; 6: 169-177.
25. Abdalla AI, Elsayed HY, García-Godoy F. Effect of hydrostatic pulpal water pressure on microtensile bond strength of selfetch adhesives to dentin. Am J Dent 2008; 21: 233-238.
26. Abdalla AI. Effect of long-term water aging on microtensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin. Am J Dent 2010; 23: 29-33.
27. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2006; 34: 97-105.
28. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 118-132.
29. Van Dijken JWV. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 27-32.
30. Brackett WW, Brackett MG, Dib A, Franco G, Estudillo H. Eighteen-month clinical performance of a self-etching primer in unprepared class V resin restorations. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 424-429.
31. Tay FR, Pashey DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: A review. J Dent 2004; 32: 173-196.
32. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-235.
33. Frankenberger R, Tay FR. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 397-412.
34. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 339-344.
35. Heintze SD, Ruffieux C, Rousson V. Clinical performance of cervical restorations-A meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 993-1000.
36. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 2007; 11: 5-33.