Toward zoöpolis? Innovation and contradiction in a conservation community

Journal of Urbanism

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 215-236

  Seymour, Mona ^a   Wolch, Jennifer ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Human animal relations; New urbanism; Sustainable communities; Zo polis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919384518     PISSN: 17549175     EISSN: 17549183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17549170903466020     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Arendt, R., 1996. Conservation design for subdivisions, Washington DC:Island Press.
2. Ball, K., 2001. Perceived environmental and social influences on walking for exercise in Australian adults. Preventive Medicine, 33:434–440.
3. Bayles, T., and Kessler, A., 2009. Wave of home defaults wanes in region. HeraldTribune.com, 16 April Available from:http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20090416/ARTICLE/904161052?Title=Wave-of-home-defaults-wanes-in-region [Accessed April 27, 2009]
4. Beatley, T., 1999. Green urbanism:learning from European cities, Washington DC and Covelo, CA:Island Press.
5. Beck, A., and Katcher, A., 1996. Between pets and people, West Lafayette:Purdue University Press.
6. Benfield, F.K., Terris, J., and Vorsanger, N., 2001. Solving sprawl:models of smart growth in communities across America, Washington DC:Island Press.
7. Berke, P.R., 2003. Greening development to protect watersheds. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(4):397–413.
8. Bloom, N.D., 2001. Suburban alchemy:1960s new towns and the transformation of the American dream, Columbus, OH:Ohio State University Press.
9. Bosso, C.J., 2003. Rethinking the concept of membership in nature advocacy organizations. The Policy Studies Journal, 31(3):397–411.
10. Chiesura, A., 2004. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68:129–138.
11. Cordell, H.K., and Super, G.R., 2000. “ Trends in Americans' outdoor recreation ”. In Trends in outdoor recreation, leisure, and tourism, Edited by:Gartner, W.C., and Lime, D.W., 133–144. Wallingford, Oxon, UK and New York, NY:CABI.
12. Corser, S., 2003. From ranchland to conservation community. Planning, 69(8):26–31.
13. English, M.R., 1999. A guide for smart growth. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 14(3):35–39.
14. Filion, P., 2003. Towards smart growth? The difficult implementation of alternatives to urban dispersion. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 12(1):48–70.
15. Fluker, A., 2009. Home sales up, but values sink. Orlando Business Journal, 13 April Available from:http://www.bizjournals.com/orlando/stories/2009/04/13/daily7.html [Accessed 27 April 2009]
16. Frantz, D., and Collins, C., 1999. Celebration, USA:living in Disney's brave new town, New York:Henry Holt and Company, LLC.
17. Gearin, E., 2004. “ Smart growth or smart growth machine? The smart growth movement and its implications ”. In Up against the sprawl:public policy and the making of Southern California, Edited by:Wolch, J.R., Pastor, M., and Dreier, P., 279–342. Minneapolis, MN and London:University of Minnesota Press.
18. Goldstein, D.S., Beyond the homeowners association:blending community development districts, tax exempt organizations and commercial POA's for larger planned communities. Twenty-eighth institute on condominium and cluster developments. October302003, Miami, Florida. Available from:http://www.newtownlaw.com/pdfs/CDD&TaxExempts.pdf [Accessed 12 September 2008]
19. Haydu, J., and Hodges, A., 2002. Economic dimensions of the Florida golf course industry, Document FE 344, Department of Food and Resource Economics, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Available from:http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/FE344 [Accessed 5 July 2009]
20. Hostetler, M.E., 2006. Covenants, codes, and restrictions that address environmental issues in residential communities, Document WEC 213, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Available from:http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/UW248 [Accessed 18 June 2009]
21. Kaplan, R., 2001. The nature of the view from home:psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33(4):507–542.
22. Kearney, A., 2006. Residential development patterns and neighborhood satisfaction:impacts of density and nearby nature. Environment and Behavior, 38(1):112–139.
23. Lyson, T.A., 2002. What does a school mean to a community? Assessing the social and economic benefits of schools to rural villages in New York. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 17:131–137.
24. Maniates, M., 2002. “ Individualization:plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world? ”. In Confronting consumption, Edited by:Princen, T., Maniates, M., and Conca, K., 43–66. Cambridge, MA and London:The MIT Press.
25. Mapes, J., and Wolch, J., forthcoming. Living green:the promise and pitfalls of new sustainable communities. Journal of Urban Design
26. Mertig, A.G., and Dunlap, R.E., 2001. Environmentalism, new social movements, and the new class:a cross-national investigation. Rural Sociology, 66(1):113–136.
27. Moughtin, C., and Shirley, P., 2005. Urban design:green dimensions, Boston:Elsevier.
28. 2003. “ Orlando Citybook ”. Orlando:Orlando Sentinel Communications.
29. PR Newswire. 4 December 2008. “ Harmony Development, a Starwood Capital affiliate, signs MOU with Florida State University to develop energy R&D facility ”. 4 December, Available from:http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=PEHED.story&STORY=/www/story/12-04-2008/0004936559&EDATE=THU+Dec+04+2008,+08:30+AM [Accessed 27 April 2009]
30. Realtor.com. n.d. “ What about the CC&Rs? ”. Available from:http://www.realtor.com/BASICS/condos/ccr.asp?source=web [Accessed 18 June 2009]
31. Rich, C., and Longcore, T., 2006. Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting, Washington DC:Island Press.
32. Robins, D., Sanders, C., and Cahill, S., 1991. Dogs and their people:pet-facilitated interaction in a public setting. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 20:3–25.
33. Sallis, J.F., Prochaska, J.J., and Taylor, W.C., 2000. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32(5):963–975.
34. Sargisson, L., and Sargent, L.T., 2004. Living in utopia:New Zealand's intentional communities, Burlington, VT:Ashgate.
35. Serpell, J., 1996. In the company of animals, New York:Cambridge University Press.
36. Sutton, R.P., 2004. Communal utopias and the American experience:secular communities, 1824–2000, Westport, CT:Praeger.
37. Thompson, R., 2004. Overcoming barriers to ecologically sensitive land management:conservation subdivisions, green developments, and the development of a land ethic. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(2):141–153.
38. Ulrich, R.S., 1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647):420–421.
39. Wilson, E.O., 1984. Biophilia, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
40. Wolch, J., 1996. Zoöpolis. Capitalism nature socialism, 7(2):21–47.
41. Wolch, J., 2003. Two by two. Planning, 69(8):32–35.