Greening development to protect watersheds: Does new urbanism make a difference?

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 397-413

  Berke, Philip R ^a   Macdonald, Joe ^a   White, Nancy ^b   Holmes, Michael ^b   Line, Dan ^b   Oury, Kat ^b   Ryznar, Rhonda ^c  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GREENSPACE; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN PLANNING; WATERSHED;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0348164764     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360308976327     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abbott, C., 2001. ‘Review of two books:The regional city:Planning for the end of sprawl and. Suburban nation:the rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream’. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21 (2):211–213.
2. American Planning Association. 1999. Modernizing state planning statutes:The growing smart working papers, Chicago:APA Planners Press. (PAS Report #480/481)
3. Arendt, R., 1996. Conservation design for subdivisions:A practical guide to creating open space networks, Washington, DC:Island Press.
4. Arnold, C., and Gibbons, C., 1996. Impervious surface coverage:The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62 (2):243–258.
5. Bartman-Aschman Associates. 1983. Shared parking, Washington, DC:Urban Land Institute.
6. Berke, P., 2002. Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty first century. Journal of Planning Literature, 17 (1):21–36.
7. Berke, P., and French, S., 1994. The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 13 (4):237–250.
8. Brown, B., and Cropper, V., 2001. New urban and standard suburban subdivisions:Evaluating psychological and social goals. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67 (4):402–419.
9. Burby, R., Nelson, A., Parker, D., and Handmer, J., 2001. Urban containment policy and exposure to natural hazards:Is there a connection?. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44 (4):475–490.
10. Burchell, R., Lowenstein, G., Dolphin, W., Galley, C., Downs, A., Seskin, S., Still, K., and Moore, T., 2002. Costs of sprawl—2000, Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
11. Calthorpe, P., 1993. The next American metropolis:Ecology, community, and the American dream, New York:Princeton Architectural Press.
12. Calthorpe, P., and Fulton, W., 2001. The regional city, Washington, DC:Island Press.
13. Cappiella, K., and Brown, K., 2001. Impervious cover and land use in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, Ellicott City, MD:Center for Watershed Protection.
14. Center for Watershed Protection. 1995. Site planning for urban stream protection, Ellicott City, MD:Author.
15. Center for Watershed Protection. 1998. Nutrient loading from conventional and innovative site development, Ellicott City, MD:Author.
16. City of Olympia. 1994. Impervious surface reduction study:Technical and policy analysis final report, Olympia, WA:Public Works Department.
17. City of Olympia. 1996. Impervious surface reduction study:Executive summary, Olympia, WA:Public Works Department.
18. Congress of the New Urbanism. 2001. Charter of the new urbanism Retrieved from www.cnu.org/charter.html
19. Crane, R., 1996. Cars and drivers in the suburbs:Linking access to travel in neotraditional planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62 (1):51–65.
20. Duany, A., and Plater-Zyberk, E., 1991. Towns and townmaking principles, New York:Rizzoli Press.
21. Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., and Speck, J., 2000. Suburban nation:The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream, New York:North Point Press.
22. Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company. 2001. SmartCode, Miami:Author.
23. Ducker, R., and Owens, D., 2000. A smart growth toolbox for local governments. Popular Government, 66 (1):29–41.
24. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1994. The quality of our nation's water:, Washington, DC:USEPA Office of Water Quality. 1992, (Report #EPA-841-S-94–002)
25. EPA. 2000. Low impact development:A literature review, Washington, DC:U.S. EPA Office of Water Quality. (Report #EPA-841-B-00–005)
26. Eppli, M., and Tu, C., 1999. Valuing the new urbanism:The impact of the new urbanism on prices of single-family homes, Washington, DC:Urban Land Institute.
27. Ewing, R., 1996. Best development practices, Chicago:American Planning Association.
28. Godschalk, D., 2000. Smart growth around the nation. Popular Government, 66 (1):12–20.
29. Jones, J., 2001. Special issue on BMP performance and receiving waters. Water Resources Impact, 3 (6):2–26.
30. Kaiser, E., Godschalk, D., and Chapin, S., 1995. Urban land use planning, Champaign:University of Illinois Press.
31. Maryland Department for the Environment. 1995. Maryland's tributary strategies for nutrient reduction:A statewide summary, Annapolis, MD:Author.
32. North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources. 2002. Neuse River basinwide water quality plan, Raleigh, NC:Author.
33. Pollard, T., 2001. Greening the American dream?:If sprawl is the problem, is new urbanism the answer?. Planning, October:10–15.
34. Rosgen, D., 1996. Applied river morphology, Pagosa Springs, CO:Wildland Hydrology.
35. Rosgen, D., 1997. “ A geomorphological approach to restoration of incised streams ”. In Management of Landscapes disturbed by channel incision:Stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, Edited by:Wang, S. Y., Langendoen, E. J., and Shields, D. F., 12–22. MS:Center for Computational Hydro Science and Engineering, University of Mississippi. University
36. Schueler, T., 1994. Use of cluster development to protect watersheds. Watershed Protection Techniques, 1 (1):137–140.
37. Schueler, T., 1995. Environmental land planning series:Site planning for urban stream protection, Ellicott City, MD:Center for Watershed Protection. (Pub. #95708)
38. South Carolina Coastal Conservation League. 1995. Getting a rein on runoff:How sprawl and the traditional town compared. SCCL Land Development Bulletin, 7:1–6.
39. Town of Port Royal. 1999. Comprehensive plan, Town of Port Royal, SC:Author.
40. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. 1996. Virginia's Shenandoah and Potomac River Basins nutrient reduction strategy, Richmond:Author.
41. White, N., Holmes, M., and Danielson, L., 1999. Development of land use change indicators to support watershed based restoration of shellfish resources impacted by fecal coliform contamination. Paper presented at the International Conference on Shellfish Restoration. October1999. Ireland:Cork.