A new network to promote evidence-based research

The Lancet

Volumn 384, Issue 9958, 2014, Pages 1903-1904

  Chalmers, Iain ^a   Nylenna, Magne ^b  

^a James Lind Initiative   (United Kingdom)

^b NORWEGIAN KNOWLEDGE CENTRE FOR THE HEALTH SERVICES   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM ANTAGONIST;

BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CANCER PATIENT; CHILD DEATH; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; RECOGNITION; SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84919360798     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62252-2     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. M Clarke, A Brice, I Chalmers Accumulating research: a systematic account of how cumulative meta-analyses would have provided knowledge, improved health, reduced harm and saved resources PLoS One 9 2014 e102670
2. I Chalmers, MB Bracken, B Djulbegovic et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set Lancet 383 2014 7 16
3. EM Antman, J Lau, B Kupelnick, F Mosteller, TC Chalmers A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction JAMA 268 1992 240 248
4. R Gilbert, G Salanti, M Harden, S See Infant sleeping position and the sudden infant death syndrome: systematic review of observational studies and historical review of clinicians' recommendations from 1940-2000 Int J Epidemiol 34 2005 74 87
5. J Horn, RJ de Haan, M Vermeulen, PGM Luiten, M Limburg Nimodipine in animal model experiments of focal cerebral ischemia: a systematic review Stroke 32 2001 2433 2438
6. AC Goudie, AJ Sutton, DR Jones, A Donald Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials J Clin Epidemiol 63 2010 983 991
7. KA Robinson, SN Goodman A systematic examination of the citation of prior research in reports of randomized, controlled trials Ann Intern Med 154 2011 50 55
8. National Institute for Health Research Guidance notes for applicants that ensure all primary research is informed by a review of the existing literature. Version 5 http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/-data/assets/pdf-file/0006/77217/Guidance-notes
9. Health Research Authority Guidance: specific questions that need answering when considering the design of clinical trials http://www.hra.nhs.uk/documents/2014/05/guidance-questions-considerations-clinical-trials.pdf 2014 (accessed Nov 18, 2014).
10. M Clarke, S Hopewell, I Chalmers Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting Lancet 376 2010 20 21
11. AP Jones, E Conroy, PR Williamson, M Clarke, C Gamble The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trials BMC Med Res Methodol 13 2013 50
12. S Clark, R Horton Putting clinical trials into context - revisited Lancet 376 2010 10 11
13. A Liberati Need to realign patient-orientated and commercial and academic research Lancet 378 2011 1777
14. KA Robinson Use of prior research in the justification and interpretation of clinical trials 2009 Johns Hopkins University, ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing Baltimore, MD 3392375. 123.
15. G Jamtvedt, H Lund, MW Nortvedt Kunnskapsbasert forskning? [Evidence based research?] Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 134 2014 10 11 (in Norwegian).