The innovativeness of national policy portfolios – climate policy change in Austria, Germany, and the UK

Environmental Politics

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 860-883

  Schaffrin, André ^a,b   Sewerin, Sebastian ^a   Seubert, Sibylle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b EA European Academy of Technology and Innovation Assessment GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

policy change; policy dynamics; policy innovation; policy measurement; policy portfolio; symbolic innovations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84918835803     PISSN: 09644016     EISSN: 17438934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2014.924206     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Bailey, I., 2007. Market environmentalism, new environmental policy instruments, and climate policy in the United Kingdom and Germany. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97 (3), 530–550. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00562.x
2. Bardach, E., 2006. Policy dynamics. In: M. Moran, M. Rein, and R.E. Goodin, eds. The Oxford handbook of public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 336–366.
3. Bauer, M.W.,Jordan, A.,Green-Pedersen, C., and Heritier, A., eds., 2012. Dismantling public policy: preferences, strategies, and effects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Baumgartner, F.R., et al., 2009. Punctuated equilibrium in comparative perspective. American Journal of Political Science, 53 (3), 603–620. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00389.x
5. Beisheim, M. and Campe, S., 2012. Transnational public–private partnerships’ performance in water governance: institutional design matters. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30 (4), 627–642. doi:10.1068/c1194
6. Béland, D., 2007. Ideas and institutional change in social security: conversion, layering, and policy drift. Social Science Quarterly, 88 (1), 20–38. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00444.x
7. Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R.C., and Vedung, E., 1998. Carrots, sticks & sermons: policy instruments & their evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
8. Black, J., Lodge, M., and Thatcher, M., 2005. Regulatory innovation: a comparative analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
9. Burck, J., Bals, C., and Ackerman, S., 2008. Der Klimaschutz-Index. Hintergrund und Methode. Bonn: Germanwatch, CAN Europe.
10. Campbell, D., 2013. After Doha: what has climate change policy accomplished? Journal of Environmental Law, 25 (1), 125–136. doi:10.1093/jel/eqt001
11. Capano, G., 2003. Administrative traditions and policy change: when policy paradigms matter. The case of Italian administrative reform during the 1990s. Public Administration, 81 (4), 781–801. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00371.x
12. Capano, G., 2009. Understanding policy change as an epistemological and theoretical problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11. 7–31. doi:10.1080/13876980802648284
13. Cashore, B. and Howlett, M., 2007. Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in Pacific Northwest forestry. American Journal of Political Science, 51 (3), 532–551. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00266.x
14. Chandler, J., 2009. Trendy solutions: why do States adopt sustainable energy portfolio standards? Energy Policy, 37 (8), 3274–3281. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.032
15. Christoff, P. and Eckersley, R., 2011. Comparing state responses. In: J.S. Dryzek, R. Norgaard, and D. Schlosberg, eds. The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 431–448.
16. Coleman, W.D., Skogstad, G., and Atkinson, M.M., 1996. Paradigm shifts and policy networks: cumulative change in agriculture. Journal of Public Policy, 16 (3), 273–301. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00007777
17. Daugbjerg, C. and Sønderskov, K.M., 2012. Environmental policy performance revisited: designing effective policies for green markets. Political Studies, 60. 399–418. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00910.x
18. De Vries, M.S., 2000. The secret and cost of success: institutional change and policy change. In: O. Van Heffen, W.J.M. Kickert, and J.J.A. Thomassen, eds. Governance in modern society: effects, change and formation of government institutions. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 61–87.
19. De Vries, M.S., 2005. Changing policy views at the local level: the effect of age, generations and policy-periods in five European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 44 (1), 1–15. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00216.x
20. Duit, A. and Galaz, V., 2008. Governance and complexity emerging issues for governance theory. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 21 (3), 311–335. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00402.x
21. Genschel, P., 1997. The dynamics of inertia: institutional persistence and change in telecommunications and health care. Governance, 10 (1), 43–66. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.281996028
22. Grant, J.T. and Kelly, N.J., 2008. Legislative productivity of the US Congress, 1789–2004. Political Analysis, 16 (3), 303–323. doi:10.1093/pan/mpm035
23. Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S., 2002. Panarchy - understanding transformations in systems of humans and nature. Washington, DC: Island Press.
24. Hacker, S.J., 2004. Reform without change, change without reform: the politics of US health policy reform in comparative perspective. In: M.A. Levin and M. Shapiro, eds. Transatlantic policymaking in an age of austerity: diversity and drift. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 13–63.
25. Hall, P.A., 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25 (3), 275–296. doi:10.2307/422246
26. Haydu, J., 1998. Making use of the past: time periods as cases to compare and as sequences of problem solving. American Journal of Sociology, 104 (2), 339–371. doi:10.1086/210041
27. Hogwood, B.W. and Peters, B.G., 1982. The dynamics of policy change: policy succession. Policy Sciences, 14 (3), 225–245. doi:10.1007/BF00136398
28. Hogwood, B.W. and Peters, B.G., 1983. Policy dynamics. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
29. Holzinger, K., Knill, C., and Sommerer, T., 2011. Is there convergence of national environmental policies? An analysis of policy outputs in 24 OECD countries. Environmental Politics, 20 (1), 20–41. doi:10.1080/09644016.2011.538163
30. Hood, C., 2007. Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: reflections on the tools of government after two decades. Governance, 20 (1), 127–144. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00347.x
31. Howlett, M., 2009. Process sequencing policy dynamics: beyond homeostasis and path dependency. Journal of Public Policy, 29 (3), 241–262. doi:10.1017/S0143814X09990158
32. Howlett, M., 2014. Why are policy innovations rare and so often negative? Blame avoidance and problem denial in climate change policy-making. Global Environmental Change, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.009
33. Howlett, M. and Cashore, B., 2009. The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: understanding policy change as a methodological problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11 (1), 33–46. doi:10.1080/13876980802648144
34. Howlett, M. and Rayner, J., 2006. Understanding the historical turn in the policy sciences: a critique of stochastic, narrative, path dependency and process-sequencing models of policy-making over time. Policy Sciences, 39 (1), 1–18. doi:10.1007/s11077-005-9004-1
35. Huitema, D. and Meijerink, S.V., 2009. Water transitions, policy entrepreneurs and change strategies: lessons learned. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
36. International Panel on Climate Change IPCC, 2007. Mitigation of climate change. Working group III contribution to the 4th assessment report. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
37. Jahn, D. and Kuitto, K., 2011. Taking stock of policy performance in central and eastern Europe: policy outcomes between policy reform, transitional pressure and international influence. European Journal of Political Research, 50 (6), 719–748. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01981.x
38. Jänicke, M., 2011. German climate change policy. Political and economic leadership. In: R.K.W. Wurzel and J. Connelly, eds. The European Union as a leader in international climate change politics. London: Routledge, 129–146.
39. John, P. and Margetts, H., 2003. Policy punctuations in the UK: fluctuations and equilibria in central government expenditure since 1951. Public Administration, 81 (3), 411–432. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00354
40. Jordan, A., et al., 2003. Policy innovation or ‘muddling through’? ‘New’ environmental policy instruments in the United Kingdom. Environmental Politics, 12 (1), 179–200. doi:10.1080/09644010412331308344a
41. Jordan, A.J. and Huitema, D., 2014. Innovations in climate policy: the politics of invention, diffusion and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 23 (5), 715–734.
42. Kingdon, J.W., 1995. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins.
43. Kinzig, A.P., et al, 2006. Resilience and regime shifts: assessing cascading effects. Ecology and Society, 11 (1), 20.
44. Knill, C., Debus, M., and Heichel, S., 2010. Do parties matter in internationalised policy areas? The impact of political parties on environmental policy outputs in 18 OECD countries, 1970–2000. European Journal of Political Research, 49 (3), 301–336. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01903.x
45. Knill, C., Schulze, K., and Tosun, J., 2012. Regulatory policy outputs and impacts: exploring a complex relationship. Regulation & Governance, 6 (4), 427–444. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01150.x
46. Krause, R.M., 2011. Symbolic or substantive policy? Measuring the extent of local commitment to climate protection. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29 (1), 46–62. doi:10.1068/c09185
47. Lascoumes, P. and Le Gales, P., 2007. Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments - from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20 (1), 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x
48. Lee, C.K. and Strang, D., 2006. The international diffusion of public-sector downsizing: network emulation and theory-driven learning. International Organization, 60 (4), 883–909. doi:10.1017/S0020818306060292
49. Lees, C., 2007. Environmental policy in the United Kingdom and Germany. German Politics, 16 (1), 164–183. doi:10.1080/09644000601157640
50. Liefferink, D., et al., 2009. Leaders and laggards in environmental policy: a quantitative analysis of domestic policy outputs. Journal of European Public Policy, 16 (5), 677–700. doi:10.1080/13501760902983283
51. Lindner, J., 2003. Institutional stability and change: two sides of the same coin¹. Journal of European Public Policy, 10 (6), 912–935. doi:10.1080/1350176032000148360
52. Lynn, L.E. Jr, 1997. Innovation and the public interest: insights from the private sector. In: A.A. Altshuler and R.D. Behn, eds. Innovation in American government: challenges, opportunities, and dilemmas. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 83–104.
53. Lyon, T. and Yin, H., 2010. Why do states adopt renewable portfolio standards?: An empirical investigation. The Energy Journal, 31 (3), 131–155. doi:10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-No3-7
54. Mahoney, J., 2000. Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29 (4), 507–548. doi:10.1023/A:1007113830879
55. Makse, T. and Volden, C., 2011. The role of policy attributes in the diffusion of innovations. The Journal of Politics, 73 (01), 108–124. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000903
56. Matisoff, D. and Edwards, J., 2014. Kindred spirits or intergovernmental competition? Environmental Politics, 23. 5, 795–817.
57. McConnell, A., 2010. Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in-between. Journal of Public Policy, 30 (3), 345–362. doi:10.1017/S0143814X10000152
58. Pelling, M. and Dill, K., 2010. Disaster politics: tipping points for change in the adaptation of sociopolitical regimes. Progress in Human Geography, 34 (1), 21–37. doi:10.1177/0309132509105004
59. Pierson, C., 2004. The modern state. London: Routledge.
60. Pierson, P., 1993. When effect becomes cause: policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45 (4), 595–628. doi:10.2307/2950710
61. Pierson, P., 2000. The limits of design: explaining institutional origins and change. Governance, 13 (4), 475–499. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00142
62. Rabe, B.G., 2006. Race to the top: the expanding role of U.S. State renewable portfolio standards[online]. Arlington, VA, Pew Center on Global Climate Change. Available from: http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Global_warming/PCGCC_renewable_0601406.pdf. Last accessed on June 06, 2012.
63. Richardson, J., 1982. Policy styles in Western Europe. London: Allen & Unwin.
64. Rogers, E.M., 2003. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
65. Rohlfing, I., 2012. Case studies and causal inference: An integrative framework. Palgrave Macmillan, Research Methods Series.
66. Schaffrin, A., 2013. Policy change: concept, measurement, and causes. An empirical analysis of climate mitigation policy. Cumulative dissertation. Cologne: University of Cologne.
67. Schreurs, M.A. and Tiberghien, Y., 2007. Multi-level reinforcement: explaining European Union leadership in climate change mitigation. Global Environmental Politics, 7 (4), 19–46. doi:10.1162/glep.2007.7.4.19
68. Sewerin, S., 2014. Comparative climate politics: patterns of climate policy performance in western democracies. Cumulative dissertation. Cologne: University of Cologne.
69. Shipan, C.R. and Volden, C., 2012. Policy diffusion: seven lessons for scholars and practitioners. Public Administration Review, 72 (6), 788–796.
70. Strebel, F. and Widmer, T., 2012. Visibility and facticity in policy diffusion: going beyond the prevailing binarity. Policy Sciences, 45 (4), 385–398. doi:10.1007/s11077-012-9161-y
71. Streeck, W. and Thelen, K.A., 2005. Beyond continuity: institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. Thelen, K.A., 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2. 369–404. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
73. Tömmel, I. and Verdun, A., 2009. Innovative governance in the European Union: the politics of multilevel policymaking. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
74. Tosun, J., 2013. Risk regulation in Europe. Assessing the application of the precautionary principle. New York: Springer.
75. Van der Heiden, N. and Strebel, F., 2012. What about non-diffusion? The effect of competitiveness in policy-comparative diffusion research. Policy Sciences, 45 (4), 345–358. doi:10.1007/s11077-012-9149-7
76. Van der Heijden, J., 2010. A short history of studying incremental institutional change: does explaining institutional change provide any new explanations? Regulation & Governance, 4 (2), 230–243. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01075.x
77. Van der Heijden, J., 2013. Different but equally plausible narratives of policy transformation: a plea for theoretical pluralism. International Political Science Review, 34 (1), 57–73. doi:10.1177/0192512112453604
78. Walker, J.L., 1969. The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63 (3), 880–899. doi:10.2307/1954434
79. Weale, A., et al, 2000. Environmental governance in Europe: an ever closer ecological union?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
80. Wurzel, R.K.W., Brückner, L., et al., 2003. Struggling to leave behind a highly regulatory past? ‘New’ environmental policy instruments in Austria. Environmental Politics, 12 (1), 51–72. doi:10.1080/714000663
81. Wurzel, R.K.W., Jordan, A., et al., 2003. From high regulatory state to social and ecological market economy? ‘New’ environmental policy instruments in Germany. Environmental Politics, 12 (1), 115–136. doi:10.1080/09644010412331308214
82. Wurzel, R.K.W. and Connelly, J., eds., 2010. The European Union as a leader in international climate change politics. London: Routledge.