Learning from practices - implications of the "practice based approach" for forest and environmental policy research

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 49, Issue , 2014, Pages 12-16

  Krott, Max ^a   Giessen, Lukas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Analytical policy analysis; Constructivism; Epistemology; Interpretivism; Objectivism; Ontology; Positivism

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; FORESTRY; ONTOLOGY;

CONSTRUCTIVISM; EPISTEMOLOGY; INTERPRETIVISM; OBJECTIVISM; POLICY ANALYSIS; POSITIVISM;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTS; INNOVATION; RESEARCH;

EID: 84918809766     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.013     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Arts B. Forests policy analysis and theory use: overview and trends. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 16:7-13. (March).
2. Arts B., Babili I. Global forest governance - multiple practices of policy performance. World forests series 2013, 111-132. Springer, Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York. B. Arts, J.H. Behagel, S. Van Bommel, J. De Koning (Eds.).
3. Arts B., Buizer M. Forests, discourses, institutions. A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. For. Policy Econ. 2009, 11(5-6):340-347.
4. Arts B., Appelstrand M., Kleinschmit D., Pülzl H., Visseren-Hamakers I.J., Eba'a Atyr R., Enters T., Mcginley K., Yasmi Y. Discourses, actors and instruments in international forest governance. IUFRO World Series 2010, 28:54-73. J. Rayner, A. Buck, P. Katila (Eds.).
5. Political Theory for Forest Policy. Forest Policy and Economics 2012, vol. 16. B. Arts, W. de Jong, M. Krott (Eds.).
6. Forest and Nature Governance - A Practice-based Approach. World forests series 2013, 111-132. Springer, Dordrecht Heidelberg London, New York. B. Arts, J.H. Behagel, S. Van Bommel, J. De Koning (Eds.).
7. Behagel J., Arts B., van Bommel S., de Koning J., Turnhout Eelle, et al. The promise of practice: the value of the "practice based approach" for forest and nature governance studies. Forest and Nature Governance - A "Practice Based Approach" 2013, 243-255. Springer, Dordrecht. B. Arts, J. Behagel, S. van Bommel, J. de. Koning, E. Tunrhout (Eds.).
8. Böcher M., Krott M. Professionelle integration als zentraler baustein zur qualitätssi-cherung von politikberatung. Z. Politikberatung (ZPB) 2012, 1:13-21.
9. Boonnman-Bersons S., Turnhout E. Globalising biodiversity: scientific practices of scaling and databasing. World Forests Series 2013, 171-191. Springer, Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York. B. Arts, J.H. Behagel, S. Van Bommel, J. De Koning (Eds.).
10. Bourdieu P. Outline of a Theory of Practice" translated by R. Nice 1977, Cambridge.
11. Brymann A. Social Research Methods 2012, Oxford university press.
12. International Handbook on Informal Governance 2012, Edward Elgar, Chaltenham, (574 pp.). T. Christiansen, C. Neuhold (Eds.).
13. de Jong W., Arts B., de Jong W., Krott M. Political theory forin forest policy science. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 16:1-6.
14. Downs A. Inside Bureaucracy 1967, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, (292 pp.).
15. Flyvbjerg B. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Giessen L. Reviewing empirical explanations of policy change: options for its analysis and future fields of research. Allg. Forst- Jagdztg. 2011, 182(11-12):248-259.
17. Giessen L. Comment to Conservation policy: listen to the voices of experience. Nature 2012, (online under http://han.sub.uni-goettingen.de/han/328_0/www.nature.com/nature/journal/v488/n7412/full/488454a.html).
18. Giessen L. Reviewing the main characteristics of the international forest regime complex and partial explanations for its fragmentation. Int. For. Rev. 2013, 15(1):1-11.
19. Giessen L. "Fragmentierung" als Schlüsselfaktor des internationalen waldregimes: von einem mono- zu einem multi-disziplinären methodischen rahmen zur vertieften forstpolitikforschung. Allg. Forst- Jagdztg. 2013, 184(3-4):47-57.
20. Giessen L., Krott M. Forestry joining integrated programmes? A question of willingness, ability and opportunities. Allg. Forst- Jagdztg. 2009, 180(5-6):94-100.
21. Krott M. Öffentliche Verwaltung im Umweltschutz. Ergebnisse einer behördenorientierten Policy-Analyse am Beispiel Waldschutz, W 1990, Braumüller Verlag, Wien.
22. Krott M. Forest Policy Analysis 2005, Springer, Dordrecht.
23. Krott M. Value and risks of the use of analytical theory in science for forest policy. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 16:35-42. (March).
24. Krott M., Bader A., Schusser C., Devkota R.R., Maryudi A., Giessen L., Aurenhammer H. Actor-centred power: The driving force in decentralised community based forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics 2013, 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.012.
25. Mert A. Partnerships for sustainable development as discursive practice: shifts in discourses of environment and democracy. For. Policy Econ. 2009, 11(5-6):326-339.
26. Modell S. In defense of triangulation: a critical realist approach to mixed methods research in management accounting. Manag. Account. Res. 2009, 20:208-221.
27. Nandigama S. Invited Spaces and Informal Practices in Participatory Community Forest Management in India. Forest and Nature Governance - A Practice Based Approach 2013, 89-107. Springer, Dordrecht. B. Arts, J. Behagel, S. van Bommel, J. de. Koning, E. Tunrhout (Eds.).
28. Nauman W.L. Social research methods, qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson Education 2006, 6th edition.
29. Peters B.G. The Politics of Bureaucracy - An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration 2010, Routledge, Oxon. Sixth edition.
30. Popper K.R. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach 1972, Oxford University Press.
31. Embracing complexity: meeting the challenges of international forest governance. IUFRO World Series 2010, vol. 28. Vienna, IUFRO, 172 pp. J. Rayner, A. Buck, P. Katila (Eds.).
32. Schatzki Theodore R., Knorr-Cetina Karin, Eike von Savigny The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory 2000, Routledge, London, (239 pp.).
33. Steinsiek P.M. Forst- und Holzforschung im "Dritten Reich" 2008, Verlag Kessel, Remagen, (382 pp.).
34. Stevanov M., et al. The Research, Integration and Utilization (RIU) model as an analytical framework for the professionalization of departmental research organizations: Case studies of publicly funded forest research institutes in Serbia and Croatia. Forest Policy and Economics 2013, 37:20-28.
35. Storch S. Forest professionalism overrides gender: a case study of nature perception in Germany. For. Policy Econ. 2011, 13:171-175.
36. Turnhout E., Bloomfield B., Hulme M., Vogel J., Wynne B. Conservation policy: listen to the voices of experience. Nature 2012, 488:454-455.
37. Weber N. Reflections on theories in forest policy: testing, combining or building?. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 16:102-108.
38. Wiersum K.F., Arts B., van Laar From practical science to a "practice based approach": a short history of forest policy studies. Forest and Nature Governance - A Practice Based Approach 2013, 23-46. Springer, Dordrecht. B. Arts, J. Behagel, S. van Bommel, J. de. Koning, E. Tunrhout (Eds.).