Political theory in forest policy science

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 16, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-6

  De Jong, Wil ^a   Arts, Bas ^a   Krott, Max ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Critical theory; Forest policy; Policy sciences; Political theory; Positivist theory

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC FIELDS; CRITICAL THEORY; CROSS FERTILIZATION; FOREST POLICY; POLITICAL SCIENCE; POLITICAL THEORY; POSITIVIST THEORY; SUB-DISCIPLINES; SUPPORT POLICY; THEORY DEVELOPMENT;

SOCIAL SCIENCES;

FORESTRY;

FERTILIZATION; FORESTS; GOVERNMENTS; SCIENCE;

EID: 84857112016     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arnouts R. Regional nature governance in the Netherlands; Four decades of governance modes and shifts in the Utrechtse Heuvelrug and Midden-Brabant 2010, Dissertation, Wageningen University, Ph.D.
2. Arnouts R., van der Zouwen M., Arts B. Analysing governance modes and shifts in governance arrangements in Dutch nature policy. Forest Policy and Economics 2011, 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.04.001.
3. Arts B. Forests policy analysis and theory use: Overview and trends. Forest Policy and Economics 2011, 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.12.003.
4. Arts B., van de Graaf R. Theories for forest policy: an overview. CIAS Discussion Paper, No. 8 2009, 35-40. Center for Integrated Area Studies, Kyoto, Japan.
5. Böcher M. A theoretical framework for explaining the choice of instruments in environmental policy. Forest Policy and Economics 2011, 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.03.012.
6. Buizer M., Van Herzele A. Combining deliberative governance theory and discourse analysis to understand the deliberative incompleteness of centrally formulated plans. Forest Policy and Economics 2010, 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.02.012.
7. Cashore B., Egan B., Auld G., Newsom D. Revising theories of non-state market driven (NSMD) governance: lessons from the Finnish forest certification experience. Global Environmental Politics 2007, 7(1):1-44.
8. de Jong W., Ruiz S.A. Strangers among trees: Territorialisation and forest policies in the northern Bolivian Amazon. Forest Policy and Economics 2011, 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.02.004.
9. Glück P. Was leistet eine moderne Forstpolitik-Wissenschaft?. Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift 1977, 32(20):490-496.
10. Kleinschmit D. Confronting the demands of a deliberative public sphere with media constraints. Forest Policy and Economics 2010, 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.02.013.
11. Krott M. Optimizing Forest Government and Governance in Europe: Defining Forest Policy with National Tradition or European Union "Modernization", CIAS Discussion Paper, No. 8 2009, 13-25. Center for Integrated Area Studies, Kyoto, Japan.
12. Krott M. Value and risks of the use of analytical theory in science for forest policy. Forest Policy and Economics 2010, 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.12.004.
13. Schmidt V.A., Radaelli C.M. Policy change and discourse in Europe: conceptual and methodological issues. West European Politics 2004, 27(2):183-210.
14. Sotirov M., Memmler M. The Advocacy Coalition Framework in natural resource policy studies: Recent experiences and further prospects. Forest Policy and Economics 2011, 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.06.007.
15. Van Gossum P., Arts B., Verheyen K. "Smart regulation": Can policy instrument design solve forest policy aims of expansion and sustainability in Flanders and the Netherlands?. Forest Policy and Economics 2009, 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.010.
16. Weber N. Reflections on theories in forest policy: Testing, combining or building?. Forest Policy and Economics 2011, 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.02.003.
17. Wiersum K.F. Social forestry: changing perspectives in forestry science or practice? 1999, Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University.
18. Winkel G. Foucault in the Forests: A review of the use of 'Foucauldian' concepts in forest policy analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 2011, 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.11.009.