What difference does a living lab make? Comparing two health technology innovation projects

CoDesign

Volumn 10, Issue , 2014, Pages 191-208

  Hyysalo, Sampsa ^a   Hakkarainen, Louna ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

case study comparison; collaborative design; health technology; innovation; living lab

Indexed keywords

EID: 84918805418     PISSN: 15710882     EISSN: 17453755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15710882.2014.983936     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Almirall, E., M. Lee, and J. Wareham. 2012. “Mapping Living Labs in the Landscape of Innovation Methodologies.” Technology Innovation Management Review, September: 12–8.
2. Almirall, E., and J.Wareham. 2008. “Living Labs and Open Innovation: Roles and Applicability.” eJov: The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks10 (3): 21–46.
3. Ballon, P., J. Pierson, and S. Delaere. 2005. “Test and Experimentation Platforms for Broadband Innovation: Examining European Practice.” Paper presented at the 16th European Regional Conference by the International Telecommunications Society (ITS), September 4–6, in Porto, Portugal.
4. Botero, A., and S.Hyysalo. 2013. “Ageing Together: Steps Towards Evolutionary Co-design in Everyday Practices.” CoDesign9 (1): 37–54.
5. Bødker, K., F.Kensing, and J.Simonsen. 2004. Participatory IT Design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Denzin, N. K.1989. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. 3rd ed.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Flick, O.2008. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage: London.
8. Garud, R., and J.Gehman. 2012. “Metatheoretical Perspectives on Sustainability Journeys: Evolutionary, Relational and Durational.” Research Policy41 (6): 980–995.
9. Glaser, B., and A.Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
10. Gobo, G.2004. “Sampling, Representativeness and Generalizability.” In Qualitative Research Practice, edited by C.Seale, G.Gobo, J. F.Gubrium, and D.Silverman, 435–456. London: Sage.
11. Hakkarainen, L.2013. Paremman Teknologian Perässä – Turvalattia ja Käyttäjälähtöisyyden Lupaus [Quest for Better Technology: Safety Floor and the Promise of User Centrism]. Helsinki: Lisensiaatin tutkimus, Helsingin yliopisto, valtiotieteellinen tiedekunta.
12. Hakkarainen, L., and S. Hyysalo. 2013. “How Do We Keep the Living Laboratory Alive? Learning and Conflicts in Living Lab Collaboration.” Technology Innovation Management Review, December: 16–23.
13. Hasu, M.2001. Critical Transition from Developers to Users. Academic Dissertation. Helsinki: Department of Education, University of Helsinki.
14. Hess, J., and V.Pipek. 2012. “Community-driven Development: Approaching Participatory Design in the Online World.” Design Issues28 (3): 62–76. 10.1162/DESI_a_00162.
15. Hillgren, P.-A., A.Seravalli, and A.Emilson. 2011. “Prototyping and Infrastructuring in Design for Social Innovation.” CoDesign7 (3–4): 169–183.
16. Hyppönen, H.2007. “eHealth Services and Technology: Challenges for Co-development.” Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments3 (2): 188–213.
17. Hyysalo, S.2003. “Some Problems in the Traditional Approaches to Predicting the Use of a Technology-driven Invention.” Innovation16 (2): 118–137.
18. Hyysalo, S.2006. “The Role of Learning-by-using in the Design of Healthcare Technologies: A Case Study.” Information Society22 (2): 89–100.
19. Hyysalo, S.2010. Health Technology Development and Use: From Practice-bound Imaginations to Evolving Impacts. New York: Routledge.
20. Hyysalo, S., and J.Lehenkari. 2003. “An Activity-theoretical Method for Studying User-participation in IS-design.” Methods of Information in Medicine42 (4): 398–404.
21. Höyssä, M., and S.Hyysalo. 2009. “The Fog of Innovation: Innovativeness and Deviance in Developing New Clinical Testing Equipment.” Research Policy38 (6): 984–993.
22. Johnson, M., H.Mozaffar, G. M.Campagnolo, S.Hyysalo, N.Pollock, and R.Williams. 2014. “The Managed Prosumer: Evolving Knowledge Strategies in the Design of Information Infrastructures.” Information, Communication and Society17 (7): 795–813.
23. Kymäläinen, T.2015. “Science Fiction Prototypes as Design Outcome of Research.” Academic dissertation, Aalto University, School of Art, Design and Architecture.
24. Leminen, S., M. Westerlund, and A.-G. Nyström. 2012. “Living Labs as Open-innovation Networks.” Technology Innovation Management Review, September: 6–11.
25. Manzini, E., and F.Rizzo. 2011. “Small Projects/large Changes: Participatory Design as an Open Participated Process.” CoDesign7 (3–4): 199–215.
26. Mulder, I., and P. J. Stappers. 2009. “Co-creating in Practice: Results and Challenges.” Paper presented at the 15th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: ICE 2009, ‘Collaborative Innovation: Emerging Technologies, Environments and Communities’, June 22–24, Leiden, The Netherlands.
27. Niitamo, Veli-Pekka, SeijaKulkki, MatsEriksson, and KarlA. Hribernik. 2006. “State-of-the-Art and Good Practice in the Field of Living Labs.” In International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: Innovative Products and Services through Collaborative Networks, Milan, Italy, 349–357.
28. Pierson, Jo, and BramLievens. 2005. “Configuring Living Labs for a ‘Thick’ Understanding of Innovation.” Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings2005 (1): 114–127.
29. Pollock, N., and S.Hyysalo. 2014. “The Business of Being A User: The Role of The Reference Actor in Shaping Packaged Enterprise System Acquisition and Development.” MIS Quarterly38 (2): 473–496.
30. Pollock, N., and R.Williams. 2008. Software and Organizations: The Biography of The Packaged Enterprize System, or, How SAP Conquered The World. London: Routledge.
31. Russell, S., and R.Williams. 2002. “Social Shaping of Technology: Frameworks, Findings and Implications for Policy With Glossary of Social Shaping Concepts.” In Shaping Technology, Guiding Policy: Concepts, Spaces and Tools, edited by KnutSorensen and RobinWilliams, 37–132. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
32. Schuler, D., and A.Namioka. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
33. Simonsen, J., and M.Hertzum. 2012. “Sustained Participatory Design: Extending The Iterative Approach.” Design Issues28 (3): 10–21.
34. Tosh, J.1991. The Pursuit of History: Aims, Methods & New Directions in The Study of Modern History. 2nd ed.London: Longman.
35. Van de Ven, A. H., D. E.Polley, R.Garud, and S.Venkataraman. 1999. The Innovation Journey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Voss, A., M.Hartswood, R.Procter, M.Rouncefield, R. S.Slack, and M.Büscher. 2009. Configuring User-designer Relations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: Springer.