You cannot choose your family: Sociological ambivalence in the hemodialysis unit

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 27-39

  Wilson, Patricia M ^a   Reston, Jonathan D ^b   Bieraugel, Rebecca ^c   Da Silva Gane, Maria ^c   Wellsted, David ^b   Offredy, Maxine ^b   Farrington, Ken ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^c MOUNT VERNON CANCER CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

focus groups; health care culture of; nephrology; participatory action research (PAR); relationships health care; self care; sociology

Indexed keywords

CAREGIVER; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF CARE;

CAREGIVERS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; RENAL DIALYSIS; SELF CARE;

EID: 84918772453     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: 15527557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732314549030     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adler P. S. Philosophy and organization theory. Chia R., ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group ; 2011: 123-153.
2. Allen D., Wainwright M., Hutchinson T. "Noncompliance" as illness management: Hemodialysis patients' descriptions of adversarial patient-clinician interactions. Social Science & Medicine. 2011 ; 73: 129-134
3. Anderson R. New MRC guidance on evaluating complex interventions. British Medical Journal. 2008 ; 337: 944-945
4. Archer M. S. Routine, reflexivity, and realism. Sociological Theory. 2010 ; 28: 272-303
5. Atkinson W. From sociological fictions to social fictions: Some Bourdieusian reflections on the concepts of "institutional habitus" and "family habitus.". British Journal of Sociology of Education. 2011 ; 32: 331-347
6. Bengtson V., Giarrusso R., Mabry J. B., Silverstein M. Solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence: Complementary of competing perspectives on intergenerational relationships?. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2002 ; 64: 568-576
7. Bodenheimer T., Lorig K., Holman H., Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002 ; 288: 2469-2475
8. Bourdieu P. The logic of practice. Oxford, UK: Polity Press ; 1990 :
9. Bourdieu P. The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York: Columbia University Press ; 1993 :
10. Bourdieu P., Passeron J. Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: SAGE ; 1977 :
11. Clark N. M. Management of chronic disease by patients. Annual Review of Public Health. 2003 ; 24: 289-313
12. ClarkN. M.NothwehrF.GongM.EvansD.MaimanL. A.HurwitzM. E.... MellinsR. B. (1995). Physician-patient partnership in managing chronic illness. Academic Medicine, 70, 957-959. Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/toc/1995/11000
13. Collins A. J., Foley R. N., Herzog C., Chavers B., Gilbertson D., Herzog C., Agodoa L. U.S. renal data system 2012 annual data report. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2013 ; 61: A7
14. Connidis I. A., McMullin J. A. Ambivalence, family ties, and doing sociology. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2002 ; 64: 594-601
15. Conservative Party. (2010). Making Britain more family friendly. London: Author. Available from http://www.con-servatives.com
16. Costantini L. Compliance, adherence, and self-management: Is a paradigm shift possible for chronic kidney disease clients?. Canadian Association of Nephrology Nurses and Technologists. 2006 ; 16 (4). 22-26
17. Coulter A. The autonomous patient: Ending paternalism in medical care. London: The Stationary Office ; 2002 :
18. Creswell J. W. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Lincoln, NE: SAGE ; 2012 :
19. Department of Health. (2001). The expert patient: A new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. London: The Stationary Office. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyandGuidance/DH-4006801
20. Department of Health. (2005). Self-care-A real choice: Self-care support-A practical option. London: Author. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-4100717
21. Dew K., Chamberlain K., Hodgetts D., Norris P., Radley A., Gabe J. Home as a hybrid centre of medication practice. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2014 ; 36: 28-43
22. FeredayJ.Muir-CochraneE. (2008). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92. Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/∼iiqm/backissues/5-1/PDF/FEREDAY.PDF
23. Gibson A., Britten N., Lynch J. Theoretical directions for an emancipatory concept of patient and public involvement. Health. 2012 ; 16: 531-547
24. Gobo G. Qualitative health research. Seale C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE ; 2004: 425-455.
25. Greenhalgh T. Patient and public involvement in chronic illness: Beyond the expert patient. British Medical Journal. 2009 ; 338: 629-631
26. Hart E. Action research for health and social care: A guide to practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press ; 1995 :
27. Closing the gap: Changing relationships. London: Author ; 2008a :
28. Co-creating health. London: Author ; 2008b :
29. Heron J., Reason P. Handbook of action research. Reason P. Bradbury H., ed. London: SAGE ; 2001: 179-188.
30. Hollingdale R., Sutton D., Hart K. Facilitating dietary change in renal disease: Investigating patients' perspectives. Journal of Renal Care. 2008 ; 34: 136-142
31. Kitzinger J. Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal. 1995 ; 311: 299-302
32. Kivits J. Informed patients and the internet: A mediated context for consultations with health professionals. Journal of Health Psychology. 2006 ; 11: 269-282
33. Kuhn A. Feminism and materialism: Women and modes of production. Kuhn A. Volpe A. M., ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul ; 2013: 42-67.
34. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books ; 1999 :
35. Lehoux P., Poland B., Daudelin G. Focus group research and "the patient's view.". Social Science & Medicine. 2006 ; 63: 2091-2104
36. LuescherK.PillemerK. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 413-425. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/353858
37. Murdock G. P. Social structure. New York: Macmillan ; 1949 :
38. Nolte E., McKee M. Caring for people with chronic conditions: A health system perspective. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press ; 2008 :
39. Norris S. L., Lau J., Smith S. J., Schmid C. H., Engelgau M. M. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002 ; 25: 1159-1171
40. Novak M., Costantini L., Schneider S., Beanlands H. Approaches to self-management in chronic illness. ; 2013 ; 2013. 188.
41. Nyström A. E. M., Segesten K. M. The family metaphor applied to nursing home life. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 1996 ; 33: 237-248
42. Parsons T., Bales R. F. Family, socialization and interaction process. New York: The Free Press ; 1955 :
43. Prior L. Belief, knowledge and expertise: The emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2003 ; 25 (3). 41-57
44. QSR International. (2006). NVIVO 7 [Computer software]. Available from www.qsrinternational.com
45. Reay D. "Always knowing" and "never being sure": Familial and institutional habituses and higher education choice. Journal of Education Policy. 1998 ; 13: 519-529
46. Renal Association. (2012). UK renal registry: The fifteenth annual report. Bristol, UK: Author. Retrieved from http://www.renalreg.com/Reports/2012.html
47. Republican Party Platform. (2004). Families are the cornerstone of our culture. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ontheissues.org/Archive/2004-GOP-Platform-Families-+-Children.htm
48. Rummery K. Healthy partnerships, healthy citizens? An international review of partnerships in health and social care and patient/user outcomes. Social Science & Medicine. 2009 ; 69: 1797-1804
49. Ryan P., Sawin K. J. The individual and family self-management theory: Background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes. Nursing Outlook. 2009 ; 57: 217-225
50. Shuttleworth A. The rise of the expert patient. Nursing Times. 2006 ; 102 (6). 18-19
51. Silverstein M., Gans D., Lowenstein A., Giarrusso R., Bengtson V. L. Older parent-child relationships in six developed nations: Comparisons at the intersection of affection and conflict. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2010 ; 72: 1006-1021
52. Sontag S. Illness as metaphor. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin ; 1983 :
53. Tattersall R. L. The expert patient: A new approach to chronic disease management for the twenty-first century. Clinical Medicine. 2002 ; 2: 227-229
54. WagnerE. H. (1998). Chronic disease management: What will it take to improve care for chronic illness?Effective Clinical Practice, 1(1), 2-4. Retrieved from http://www.acponline.org/clinical-information/journals-publications/ecp/augsep98/cdm.htm
55. Warsi A., Wang P. S., LaValley M. P., Avorn J., Solomon D. H. Self-management education programs in chronic disease: A systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2004 ; 164: 1641-1649
56. Webb J., Shirato T., Danaher G. Understanding Bourdieu. Sydney: Allen & Unwin ; 2002 :
57. Wilson P. M. A policy analysis of the expert patient in the United Kingdom: Self-care as an expression of pastoral power?. Health and Social Care in the Community. 2001 ; 9: 134-142
58. Wilson P. M., Kendall S., Brooks F. Nurses' responses to expert patients: The rhetoric and reality of self-management in long-term conditions: A grounded theory study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2006 ; 43: 803-818
59. Wilson P. M., Kendall S., Brooks F. The expert patient's programme: A paradox of patient empowerment and medical dominance?. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2007 ; 15: 426-438