Impaired homeostatic regulation of feedback inhibition associated with system deficiency to detect fluctuation in stimulus intensity: A simulation study

Neurocomputing

Volumn 151, Issue P3, 2015, Pages 1248-1254

  Faghihi, Faramarz ^a   Moustafa, Ahmed A ^b,c  

^a Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^c WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Connectivity Rate; Feedback Inhibition; Homeostatic Regulation; Integrate And Fire Model; System Efficiency

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; EFFICIENCY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY;

FEEDBACK INHIBITION; HOMEOSTATIC REGULATIONS; INCREMENTAL CHANGES; INTEGRATE-AND-FIRE MODEL; PATHOLOGICAL CASE; SIMULATION STUDIES; STIMULUS INTENSITY; SYSTEM EFFICIENCY;

FEEDBACK;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CONNECTOME; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED RESPONSE; EXCITATION AND STIMULATION; HOMEOSTASIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NERVE STIMULATION; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PLOTS AND CURVES; SIMULATION; SPIKE WAVE; STIMULUS INTENSITY; SYSTEM EFFICIENCY;

EID: 84918493394     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: 18728286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Grimsley C.A., Sanchez J.T., Sivaramakrishnan S. Midbrain local circuits shape sound intensity codes, Front. Neural Circuits 2013, 7:174.
2. Billimoria C.P., Kraus B.J., Narayan R., Maddox R.K., Sen K. Invariance and sensitivity to intensity in neural discrimination of natural sounds. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28(25):6304-6308.
3. Fourcaud-Trocme N., Hansel D., van Vreeswijk C., Brunel N. How spike generation mechanisms determine the neuronal response to fluctuating inputs. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23(37):11628-11640.
4. Kenyon G.T., Theiler J., George J.S., Travis B.J., Marshak D.W. Correlated firing improves stimulus discrimination in a retinal model. Neural Comput. 2004, 16(11):2261-2291.
5. Wang L., Narayan R., Graña G., Shamir M., Sen K. Cortical discrimination of complex natural stimuli: can single neurons match behavior?. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27(3):582-589.
6. Buracas G.T., Zador A.M., DeWeese M.R., Albright T.D. Efficient discrimination of temporal patterns by motion-sensitive neurons in primate visual cortex. Neuron 1998, 20(5):959-969.
7. Masek P., Heisenberg M. Distinct memories of odor intensity and quality in drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2008, 105(41):15985-15990.
8. Basalyga G., Montemurro M.A., Wennekers T. Information coding in a laminar computational model of cat primary visual cortex. J. Comput. Neurosci 2013, 34(2):273-283.
9. Petersen C.C., Crochet S. Synaptic computation and sensory processing in neocortical layer 2/3. Neuron 2013, 78(1):28-48.
10. Smith M.A., Sommer M.A. Spatial and temporal scales of neuronal correlation in visual area v4. J. Neurosci 2013, 33(12):5422-5432.
11. Imai T. Positional information in neural map development: Lessons from the olfactory system. Dev. Growth. Differ 2012, 54(3):358-365.
12. D'Amelio M., Rossini P.M. Brain excitability and connectivity of neuronal assemblies in Alzheimer's disease: from animal models to human findings. Prog. Neurobiol 2012, 99(1):42-60.
13. Jadzinsky P.D., Baccus S.A. Transformation of visual signals by inhibitory interneurons in retinal circuits. Annu. Rev. Neurosci 2013, 36:403-428.
14. Miura K., Tsubo Y., Okada M., Fukai T. Balanced excitatory and inhibitory inputs to cortical neurons decouple firing irregularity from rate modulations. J. Neurosci 2007, 27(50):13802-13812.
15. Sengupta B., Laughlin S.B., Niven J.E. Balanced excitatory and inhibitory synaptic currents promote efficient coding and metabolic efficiency. PloS Comput. Biol 2013, 9(10):e1003263.
16. Soto F., Bleckert A., Lewis R., Kang Y., Kerschensteiner D., Craig A.M., Wong R.O. Coordinated increase in inhibitory and excitatory synapses onto retinal ganglion cells during development. Neural Dev 2011, 6:31.
17. Taub A.H., Katz Y., Lampl I. Cortical balance of excitation and inhibition is regulated by the rate of synaptic activity. J. Neurosci 2013, 33(36):14359-14368.
18. Nadim F., Zhao S., Zhou L., Bose A. Inhibitory feedback promotes stability in an oscillatory network. J. Neural Eng. 2011, 8(6):065001.
19. Tahvildari B., Wölfel M., Duque A., McCormick, selective D.A., functional interactions between excitatory and inhibitory cortical neurons and differential contribution to persistent activity of the slow oscillation. J. Neurosci 2012, 32(35):12165-12179.
20. Lawrence J.J., McBain C.J. Interneuron diversity series: containing the detonation - feedforward inhibition in the CA3 hippocampus. Trends Neurosci 2003, 26(11):631-640.
21. Liang L., Yulong L., Potter C.J., Yizhar O., Deisseroth K., Tsien R.W., Luo L. GABAergic projection neurons route selective olfactory inputs to specific higher-order neurons. Neuron 2013, 79(5):917-931.
22. Porr B., McCabe L., di Prodi P., Kolodziejski C., Wörgötter F. How feedback inhibition shapes spike-timing-dependent plasticity and its implications for recent schizophrenia models. Neural Networks 2011, 24(6):560-567.
23. Tsodyks M.V., Sejnowski T. Rapid state switching in balanced cortical network models. Network 1995, 6:111-124.
24. Zeldenrust F., Wadman W.J. Two forms of feedback inhibition determine the dynamical state of a small hippocampal network. Neural Networks 2009, 22(8):1139-1158.
25. Kullmann D.M. Interneuron networks in the hippocampus. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol 2011, 21(5):709-716.
26. Elfant D., Pal B.Z., Emptage N., Capogna M. Specific inhibitory synapses shift the balance from feedforward to feedback inhibition of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells. Eur. J. Neurosci 2008, 27(1):104-113.
27. Konradi C., Yang C.K., Zimmerman E.I., Lohmann K.M., Gresch P., Pantazopoulos H., Berretta S., Heckers S. Hippocampal interneurons are abnormal in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res 2011, 131(1-3):165-173.
28. Benes F.M., Kwok E.W., Vincent S.L., Todtenkopf M.S. A reduction of non-pyramidal cells in sector CA2 of schizophrenics and manic depressives. Biol. Psychiat. 1998, 44(2):88-97.
29. Isaacson J.S., Scanziani M. How inhibition shapes cortical activity. Neuron 2011, 72(2):231-243.
30. Rubenstein J.L. Three hypotheses for developmental defects that may underlie some forms of autisms pectrum disorder. Curr. Opin. Neurol 2010, 23(2):118-123.
31. Rubenstein J.L., Merzenich M.M. Model of autism: increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems. Gene Brain Behav. 2003, 2(5):255-267.
32. Granot-Atedge E., Tkacik G., Segev R., Schneidman E. Stimulus-dependent maximum entropy models of neural population codes. PloS Comput. Biol 2013, 9(3):e1002922.
33. Faghihi F., Kolodziejski C., Fiala A., Wörgötter F., Tetzlaff C. An information theoretic model of information processing in the drosophila olfactory system: the role of inhibitory neurons for system efficiency. Front. Comput. Neurosci 2013, 7:183.
34. Naud R., Gerhard F., Mensi S., Gerstner S.W. Improved similarity measures for small sets of spike trains. Neural Comput 2011, 23(12):3016-3069.
35. Paiva A.R.C., Park I.I., Principe J.C. A comparison of binless spike train measures. Neural Comput. Appl. 2010, 19(3):1-15.
36. Tkacik G., Granot-Atedgi E., Segev R., Schneidman E. Retinal metric: a stimulus distance measure derived from population neural responses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110(5):058104.
37. Chicharro D., Kreuz T., Andrzejak R.G. What can spike train distances tell us about the neural code?. J. Neurosci. Meth. 2011, 199(1):146-165.
38. Wohlgemuth S., Ronacher B. Auditory discrimination of amplitude modulations based on metric distances of spike trains. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 97(4):3082-3092.
39. de Ruyter van Steveninck R.R., Lewen G.D., Strong S.P., Koberle R., Bialek W. Reproducibility and variability in neural spike trains. Science 1997, 275(5307):1805-1808.
40. Gerstner W., Kistler W. Spiking Neuron Models. Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
41. Wüstenberg D.G., Boytcheva M., Grünewald B., Byrne J.H., Menzel R., Baxter D.A. Current and voltage-clamp recordings and computer simulations of Kenyon cells in honeybees. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 92(4):2589-2603.
42. Yarali A., Ehser S., Hapil F.Z., Huang J., Gerber, Odour B. intensity learning in fruit flies. Proc. Biol. Sci 2009, 276(1672):3413-3420.
43. Jang H.J., Kwag J. GABA receptor-mediated feedforward and feedback inhibition differentially modulate hippocampal spike timing-dependent plasticity. Biochem. Bioph. Res. Co. 2012, 427(3):466-472.
44. Grunewald B. Physiological properties and response modulations of mushroom body feedback neurons during olfactory learning in the honeybee, Apismellifera. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 1999, 185(6):565-576.
45. Froese A., Szyszka P., Menzel R. Effect of GABAergic inhibition on odorant concentration coding in mushroom body intrinsic neurons of the honeybee. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 2013, 200(3):183-195.
46. Vattikuti S., Chow C.C. A computational model for cerebral cortical dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. Biol. Psych 2010, 67(7):672-678.