Transformation of visual signals by inhibitory interneurons in retinal circuits

Annual Review of Neuroscience

Volumn 36, Issue , 2013, Pages 403-428

  Jadzinsky, Pablo D ^a   Baccus, Stephen A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational models; Interneurons; Neural circuits

Indexed keywords

4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID RECEPTOR;

BRAIN REGION; CELL FUNCTION; CHROMATIN; CONNECTOME; DORSAL ROOT; EYE MOVEMENT; GABAERGIC SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERNEURON; MOTION; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; RETINA AMACRINE CELL; RETINA BIPOLAR GANGLION CELL; REVIEW; SENSITIZATION; SENSORY NERVE CELL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYNAPSE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ANIMALS; INTERNEURONS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; NEURAL INHIBITION; RETINA; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 84880256136     PISSN: 0147006X     EISSN: 15454126     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170315     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Baccus SA. 2007. Timing and computation in inner retinal circuitry. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 69:271-900
2. Baccus SA, Meister M. 2002. Fast and slow contrast adaptation in retinal circuitry. Neuron 36(5):909-199
3. Baccus SA, Olveczky BP, Manu M, Meister M. 2008. A retinal circuit that computes objectmotion. J. Neurosci. 28(27):6807-177
4. Barlow H. 1953. Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina. J. Physiol. 119:69-888
5. Barlow H. 1961. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In Sensory Communication, ed. WA Rosenblith, pp. 217-34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Presss
6. Berry MJ II, Warland DK, Meister M. 1997. The structure and precision of retinal spike trains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94(10):5411-166
7. Chen S, Li W. 2012. A color-coding amacrine cell may provide a blue-Off signal in a mammalian retina. Nat. Neurosci. 15(7):954-566
8. Chichilnisky EJ. 2001. A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses. Network 12(2):199-2133
9. Crook JD, Peterson BB, Packer OS, Robinson FR, Troy JB, Dacey DM. 2008. Y-cell receptive field and collicular projection of parasol ganglion cells in macaque monkey retina. J. Neurosci. 28(44):11277-911
10. Demb JB, Singer JH. 2012. Intrinsic properties and functional circuitry of the AII amacrine cell. Vis. Neurosci. 29(1):51-600
11. De Vries SEJ, Baccus SA, Meister M. 2011. The projective field of a retinal amacrine cell. J. Neurosci. 31(23):8595-6044
12. Dong CJ, Hare WA. 2003. Temporal modulation of scotopic visual signals by A17 amacrine cells in mammalian retina in vivo. J. Neurophysiol. 89(4):2159-666
13. Dunn FA, Rieke F. 2008. Single-photon absorptions evoke synaptic depression in the retina to extend the operational range of rod vision. Neuron 57(6):894-9044
14. Eggers ED, Lukasiewicz PD. 2006. GABA(A), GABA(C) and glycine receptor-mediated inhibition differentially affects light-evoked signalling from mouse retinal rod bipolar cells. J. Physiol. 572(Pt. 1):215-255
15. Euler T, Detwiler PB, Denk W. 2002. Directionally selective calcium signals in dendrites of starburst amacrine cells. Nature 418:845-522
16. Fairhall AL, Lewen GD, Bialek W, de Ruyter van Steveninck RR. 2001. Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code. Nature 412:787-922
17. Feigenspan A, Wassle H, Bormann J. 1993. Pharmacology ofGABAreceptorCl- channels in rat retinal bipolar cells. Nature 361:159-622
18. Fried SI, M?unch TA, Werblin FS. 2002. Mechanisms and circuitry underlying directional selectivity in the retina. Nature 420:411-144
19. Gavrikov KE, Nilson JE, Dmitriev AV, Zucker CL, Mangel SC. 2006. Dendritic compartmentalization of chloride cotransporters underlies directional responses of starburst amacrine cells in retina. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103(49):18793-988
20. Geffen MN, De Vries SEJ, Meister M. 2007. Retinal ganglion cells can rapidly change polarity from Off to On. PLoS Biol. 5(3):e655
21. Gollisch T, Meister M. 2010. Eye smarter than scientists believed: neural computations in circuits of the retina. Neuron 65(2):150-644
22. Grimes WN, Zhang J, Graydon CW, Kachar B, Diamond JS. 2010. Retinal parallel processors: more than 100 independent microcircuits operate within a single interneuron. Neuron 65(6):873-855
23. Habermann CJ, O'Brien BJ, W?assle H, Protti DA. 2003. AII amacrine cells express L-type calcium channels at their output synapses. J. Neurosci. 23(17):6904-133
24. Harris JJ, Jolivet R, Attwell D. 2012. Synaptic energy use and supply. Neuron 75(5):762-777
25. Horowitz P, Hill W. 1989. The Art of Electronics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. 2nd ed..
26. Hosoya T, Baccus SA, Meister M. 2005. Dynamic predictive coding by the retina. Nature 436:71-777
27. Kastner DB, Baccus SA. 2011. Coordinated dynamic encoding in the retina using opposing forms of plasticity. Nat. Neurosci. 14(10):1317-222
28. Kraaij DA, Spekreijse H, Kamermans M. 2012. The open- and closed-loop gain-characteristics of the cone/horizontal cell synapse in goldfish retina. J. Neurophysiol. 84:1256-655
29. Kuffler SW. 1953. Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. J. Neurophysiol. 16(1):37-688
30. Laughlin SB. 1981. A simple coding procedure enhances a neuron's information capacity. Z. Naturforsch. 36:910-122
31. Laughlin SB. 1989. The role of sensory adaptation in the retina. J. Exp. Biol. 146:39-622
32. Lee S, Zhou ZJ. 2006. The synapticmechanism of direction selectivity in distal processes of starburst amacrine cells. Neuron 51(6):787-999
33. Lehky S, Sejnowski T. 1988. Networkmodel of shape-from-shading: neural function arises from both receptive and projective fields. Nature 333:452-544
34. Lettvin JY, Maturana HR, McCulloch WS, Pitts WH. 1959. What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain. Proc. IRE 47:1940-511
35. Levick WR. 1967. Receptive fields and trigger features of ganglion cells in the visual streak of the rabbit's retina. J. Physiol. 188(3):285-3077
36. MacNeil MA, Masland RH. 1998. Extreme diversity among amacrine cells: implications for function. Neuron 20(5):971-822
37. Manookin MB, Beaudoin DL, Ernst ZR, Flagel LJ, Demb JB. 2008. Disinhibition combines with excitation to extend the operating range of the OFF visual pathway in daylight. J. Neurosci. 28(16):4136-500
38. Manu M, Baccus SA. 2011. Disinhibitory gating of retinal output by transmission from an amacrine cell. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(45):18447-522
39. Masland RH. 2012. The tasks of amacrine cells. Vis. Neurosci. 29(01):3-99
40. Nowak P, Dobbins AC, Gawne TJ, Grzywacz NM, Amthor FR. 2011. Separability of stimulus parameter encoding by on-off directionally selective rabbit retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurophysiol. 105(5):2083-999
41. Oesch N, Euler T, Taylor WR. 2005. Direction-selective dendritic action potentials in rabbit retina. Neuron 47(5):739-500
42. O? lveczky BP, Baccus SA, Meister M. 2003. Segregation of object and backgroundmotion in the retina. Nature 423(6938):401-88
43. Olveczky BP, Baccus SA, Meister M. 2007. Retinal adaptation to object motion. Neuron 56(4):689-7000
44. Ozuysal Y, Baccus SA. 2012. Linking the computational structure of variance adaptation to biophysical mechanisms. Neuron 73(5):1002-155
45. Pang JJ, Gao F, Wu SM. 2002. Segregation and integration of visual channels: layer-by-layer computation of ON-OFF signals by amacrine cell dendrites. J. Neurosci. 22(11):4693-7011
46. Pourcho RG, Goebel DJ. 1983. Neuronal subpopulations in cat retina which accumulate the GABA agonist, (3H)muscimol: a combined Golgi and autoradiographic study. J. Comp. Neurol. 219(1):25-355
47. Rieke F. 2001. Temporal contrast adaptation in salamander bipolar cells. J. Neurosci. 21(23):9445-544
48. Rodieck RW, Stone J. 1965. Analysis of receptive fields of cat retinal ganglion cells. J. Neurophysiol. 28(5):832-499
49. Roska B, Werblin F. 2003. Rapid global shifts in natural scenes block spiking in specific ganglion cell types. Nat. Neurosci. 6(6):600-88
50. Ruderman D, Bialek W. 1994. Statistics of natural images: scaling in the woods. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73(6):814-177
51. Russell TL, Werblin FS. 2010. Retinal synaptic pathways underlying the response of the rabbit local edge detector. J. Neurophysiol. 103(5):2757-699
52. Schwartz G, Rieke F. 2011. Perspectives on: information and coding in mammalian sensory physiology. Nonlinear spatial encoding by retinal ganglion cells: when 1 + 1 = 2. J. Gen. Physiol. 138(3):283-900
53. Shapley RM, Victor JD. 1980. The effect of contrast on the non-linear response of the Y cell. J. Physiol. 302:535-477
54. Sher A, DeVries SH. 2012. A non-canonical pathway for mammalian blue-green color vision. Nat. Neurosci. 15(7):952-533
55. Simoncelli EP, Olshausen BA. 2001. Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24:1193-2166
56. Srinivasan MV, Laughlin SB, Dubs A. 1982. Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 216:427-59
57. Thoreson WB, Mangel SC. 2012. Lateral interactions in the outer retina. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 31(5):407-411
58. Vaney DI, Sivyer B, Taylor WR. 2012. Direction selectivity in the retina: symmetry and asymmetry in structure and function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13(3):194-2088
59. Vaney DI, Taylor WR. 2002. Direction selectivity in the retina. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12(4):405-100
60. van Hateren H. 2005. A cellular and molecular model of response kinetics and adaptation in primate cones and horizontal cells. J. Vis. 5:331-477
61. Van Hateren JH. 1993. Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity of early vision. Vis. Res. 33(2):257-677
62. V? olgyi B, Xin D, Amarillo Y, Bloomfield SA. 2001. Morphology and physiology of the polyaxonal amacrine cells in the rabbit retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 440:109-255
63. Werblin FS. 2010. Six different roles for crossover inhibition in the retina: correcting the nonlinearities of synaptic transmission. Vis. Neurosci. 27(1-2):1-88
64. Zhang Y, Kim I-J, Sanes JR, Meister M. 2012. The most numerous ganglion cell type of the mouse retina is a selective feature detector. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(36):E2391-988