Continuous and discontinuous pressure assisted osmosis (PAO)

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 476, Issue , 2015, Pages 182-193

  Lutchmiah, Kerusha ^a,b   Harmsen, Danny J H ^a   Wols, Bas A ^a   Rietveld, Luuk C ^b   Qin, Jianjun ^c   Cornelissen, Emile R ^a  

^a KWR WATERCYCLE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c PUB Consultants Pte Ltd   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Concentration polarisation (CP); FO transport model; Forward osmosis; Membrane deformation; Pressure assisted osmosis (PAO)

Indexed keywords

DEFORMATION; MEMBRANES; POLARIZATION;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; CONCENTRATION POLARISATION; DISCONTINUOUS PRESSURES; FORWARD OSMOSIS; HYDRAULIC PRESSURE; MASS TRANSPORT MODEL; MEMBRANE PROCESS; TRANSPORT MODELING;

OSMOSIS;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ARTICLE; CONTINUOUS PRESSURE ASSISTED OSMOSIS; DIFFUSION; DISCONTINUOUS PRESSURE ASSISTED OSMOSIS; MEMBRANE; OSMOSIS; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; POLARIZATION; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SOLUBILITY; WATER PERMEABILITY;

EID: 84917708658     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.022     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Zhao S., Zou L., Tang C.Y., Mulcahy D. Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 396:1-21.
2. Thompson N.A., Nicoll P.G. Forward Osmosis Desalination: A Commercial Reality 2011, IDA World Congress, Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre (PCEC), Perth, Western Australia.
3. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Marchand E.A., Childress A.E. The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: a low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination 2009, 238:10-21.
4. Cath T.Y., Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:70-87.
5. Lee S., Boo C., Elimelech M., Hong S. Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 365:34-39.
6. Lutchmiah K., Verliefde A.R.D., Roest K., Rietveld L.C., Cornelissen E.R. Forward osmosis for application in wastewater treatment: a review. Water Res. 2014, 58:179-197.
7. Song X., Liu Z., Sun D.D. Nano gives the answer: breaking the bottleneck of internal concentration polarization with a nanofiber composite forward osmosis membrane for a high water production rate. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23:3256-3260.
8. Phuntsho S., Hong S., Elimelech M., Shon H.K. Osmotic equilibrium in the forward osmosis process: modelling, experiments and implications for process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 453:240-252.
9. Phuntsho S., Vigneswaran S., Kandasamy J., Hong S., Lee S., Shon H.K. Influence of temperature and temperature difference in the performance of forward osmosis desalination process. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415-416:734-744.
10. Kim Y.C., Park S.-J. Experimental study of a 4040 spiral-wound forward-osmosis membrane module. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:7737-7745.
11. Coday B.D., Heil D.M., Xu P., Cath T.Y. Effects of transmembrane hydraulic pressure on performance of forward osmosis membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:2386-2393.
12. Yun T., Kim Y.-J., Lee S., Hong S., Kim G.I. Flux behavior and membrane fouling in pressure-assisted forward osmosis. Desalin. Water Treat. 2014, 52:1-6.
13. Blandin G., Verliefde A.R.D., Tang C.Y., Childress A.E., Le-Clech P. Validation of assisted forward osmosis (AFO) process: impact of hydraulic pressure. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 447:1-11.
14. Lutchmiah K., Cornelissen E.R., Harmsen D.J.H., Post J.W., Lampi K., Ramaekers H., Rietveld L.C., Roest K. Water recovery from sewage using forward osmosis. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 64:1443-1449.
15. E.R. Cornelissen, K. Lutchmiah, D. Harmsen, J. Qin, J. Kappelhof, Additional feed pressure (pulsation) to increase forward osmosis membrane performance, in: Proceedings of the International Congress on Membranes (ICOM), Amsterdam, 2011.
16. Lee K.L., Baker R.W., Lonsdale H.K. Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 1981, 8:141-171.
17. P. Le-Clech, Assisted Forward Osmosis for Energy Savings in RO desalination, Research Project Portfolio, The National Centre of Excellence in Desalination Australia, 2012.
18. Cornelissen E.R., Harmsen D., Beerendonk E.F., Qin J.J., Oo H., Korte K.F.d., Kappelhof J.W.M.N. The innovative Osmotic Membrane Bioreactor (OMBR) for reuse of wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63:1557-1565.
19. Missimer T.M., Ng K.C., Amy G. Processes and Apparatus for Inhibiting Membrane Biofouling 2012, King Abdullah University Of Science And Technology.
20. Kim Y.C., Elimelech M. Adverse impact of feed channel spacers on the performance of pressure retarded osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:4673-4681.
21. Klaysom C., Cath T.Y., Depuydt T., Vankelecom I.F.J. Forward and pressure retarded osmosis: potential solutions for global challenges in energy and water supply. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42:6959-6989.
22. Lonsdale H.K., Merten U., Riley R.L. Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1965, 9:1341.
23. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:114-123.
24. Ng H.Y., Tang W., Wong W.S. Performance of forward (direct) osmosis process: membrane structure and transport phenomenon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:2408-2413.
25. Tang C.Y., She Q., Lay W.C.L., Wang R., Fane A.G. Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 354:123-133.
26. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:237-247.
27. Loeb S., Titelman L., Korngold E., Freiman J. Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 129:243-249.
28. Wang R., Shi L., Tang C.Y., Chou S., Qiu C., Fane A.G. Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 355:158-167.
29. She Q., Jin X., Tang C.Y. Osmotic power production from salinity gradient resource by pressure retarded osmosis: effects of operating conditions and reverse solute diffusion. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 402:262-401-273.
30. Yu G. Rock Mechanics: Pore Pressure Prediction Sees Improvements 2008, Exploration & Production, Hart Energy Publishings, Houston, Texas.
31. Cornelissen E.R., Harmsen D., de Korte K.F., Ruiken C.J., Qin J.J., Oo H., Wessels L.P. Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 319:158-168.
32. Cornelissen E.R., Harmsen D.J.H., Beerendonk E.F., Qin J.J., Kappelhof J.W.M.N. Effect of draw solution type and operational mode of forward osmosis with laboratory-scale membranes and a spiral wound membrane module. J. Water Reuse Desalin. 2011, 1:133-140.
33. Phillip W.A., Yong J.S., Elimelech M. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. Environ. Science Technol. 2010, 44:5170-5176.
34. Yong J.S., Phillip W.A., Elimelech M. Coupled reverse draw solute permeation and water flux in forward osmosis with neutral draw solutes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 392-393:9-17.
35. Yang Q., Wang K.Y., Chung T.S. Dual-layer hollow fibers with enhanced flux as novel forward osmosis membranes for water production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:2800-2805.
36. Yin Yip N., Tiraferri A., Phillip W.A., Schiffman J.D., Elimelech M. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:3812-3818.
37. Tiraferri A., Yip N.Y., Phillip W.A., Schiffman J.D., Elimelech M. Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and structure. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 367:340-352.
38. Lutchmiah K., Lauber L., Roest K., Harmsen D.J.H., Post J.W., Rietveld L.C., van Lier J.B., Cornelissen E.R. Zwitterions as alternative draw solutions in forward osmosis for application in wastewater reclamation. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 460:82-90.
39. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Childress A.E. Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 364:233-241.
40. Qin J.J., Lay W.C.L., Kekre K.A. Recent developments and future challenges of forward osmosis: a review. Desalin. Water Treat. 2012, 39:123-136.
41. Jespersen N.D. Barron's AP Chemistry 2014, 7 ed.
42. Hancock N.T., Cath T.Y. Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:6769-6775.
43. Tan C.H., Ng H.Y. Revised external and internal concentration polarization models to improve flux prediction in forward osmosis process. Desalination 2013, 309:125-140.
44. Lobo V.M.M., Quaresma J.L. Handbook of Electrolyte Solutions, Part A 1989, Elsevier.
45. Tan C.H., Ng H.Y. A novel hybrid forward osmosis - nanofiltration (FO-NF) process for seawater desalination: draw solution selection and system configuration. Desalin. Water Treat. 2010, 13:356-361.
46. Gray G.T., McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation. Desalination 2006, 197:1-8.
47. She Q., Jin X., Li Q., Tang C.Y. Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes. Water Res. 2012, 46:2478-2486.
48. Tan C.H., Ng H.Y. Modeling of external and internal concentration polarization effect on flux behaviour of forward osmosis. Water Sci. Technol.: Water Supply 2008, 8:533-539.
49. Mi B., Elimelech M. Gypsum scaling and cleaning in forward osmosis: measurements and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:2022-2028.
50. Simon A., Penpenic L., Gondrexon N., Taha S., Dorange G. A comparative study between classical stirred and ultrasonically-assisted dead-end ultrafiltration. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2000, 7:183-186.
51. Turner S. Creep of Polymeric Materials 2001, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford.
52. Rosato D.V., Rosato D.V., Rosato M.G. Plastics Design Handbook 2001.
53. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology 1996, Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2nd Edition.
54. Xu Y., Peng X., Tang C.Y., Fu Q.S., Nie S. Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 348:298-309.