Effect of draw solution type and operational mode of forward osmosis with laboratory-scale membranes and a spiral wound membrane module

Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 133-140

  Cornelissen, E R ^a   Harmsen, D J H ^a   Beerendonk, E F ^a   Qin, J J ^b   Kappelhof, J W M N ^c  

^a KWR WATERCYCLE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^b Technology and Water Quality Office   (Singapore)

^c Waternet   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Forward osmosis; Osmotic driving force; Salt flux; Spiral wound membrane elements; Water flux

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894253460     PISSN: 22201319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wrd.2011.042     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Achilli, A., Cath, T. Y., Marchand, E. A. & Childress, A. E. 2009. The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: a low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination 238 (1-3), 10-21.
2. Babu, B. R., Rastogi, N. K. & Raghavarao, K. S. 2006. Effect of process parameters on transmembrane flux during direct osmosis. J. Memb. Sci. 280 (1-2), 185-194.
3. Cath, T. Y., Gormly, S., Beaudry, E. G., Flynn, M. T., Adams, V. D. & Childress, A. E. 2005. Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space: part I. Direct osmotic concentration as pretreatment for reverse osmosis. J. Memb. Sci. 257 (1-2), 85-98.
4. Cornelissen, E. R., Chasseriaud, D., Siegers, W. G., Beerendonk, E. F. & van der Kooij, D. 2010a. Effect of anionic fluidized ion exchange (FIX) pre-treatment on nanofiltration (NF) membrane fouling. Water Res. 44 (10), 3283-3293.
5. Cornelissen, E. R., Harmsen, D., Beerendonk, E. F., Qin, J. J., Oo, H., de Korte, K. F. & Kappelhof, J. W. N. M. 2010b. The innovative Osmotic Membrane Bioreactor (OMBR) for reuse of wastewater. Water Sci. Technol: Water Supply 63 (8), 1557-1565.
6. Cornelissen, E. R., Harmsen, D., de Korte, K. F., Ruiken, C. J., Qin, J. J., Oo, H. & Wessels, L. P. 2008. Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge. J. Memb. Sci. 319 (1-2), 158-168.
7. Hancock, N. T. & Cath, T. Y. 2009. Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. Environ. Eng. Sci. 43, 6769-6775.
8. Lay, W. C. L., Chong, T. H., Tang, C. Y., Fane, A. G., Zhang, J. & Liu, Y. 2010. Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon. Water Sci. Technol. 61, 927-936.
9. McGinnis, R. L. & Elimelech, M. 2007. Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination. Desalination 207 (1-3), 370-382.
10. Mi, B. & Elimelech, M. 2008. Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 320 (1-2), 292-302.
11. Tang, C. Y., She, Q., Lay, W. C. L., Wang, R. & Fane, A. G. 2010. Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. J. Memb. Sci. 354 (1-2), 123-133.
12. Xu, Y., Peng, X., Tang, C. Y., Fu, Q. S. & Nie, S. 2010. Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module. J. Memb. Sci. 348 (1-2), 298-309.
13. Zou, S., Gu, Y., Xiao, D. & Tang, C. Y. 2011. The role of physical and chemical parameters on forward osmosis membrane fouling during algae separation. J. Memb. Sci. 366 (1-2), 356-362.