Zwitterions as alternative draw solutions in forward osmosis for application in wastewater reclamation

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 460, Issue , 2014, Pages 82-90

  Lutchmiah, Kerusha ^a,b   Lauber, Lionel ^a   Roest, Kees ^a   Harmsen, Danny J H ^a   Post, Jan W ^c,d   Rietveld, Luuk C ^b   van Lier, Jules B ^b   Cornelissen, Emile R ^a  

^a KWR WATERCYCLE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d EUROPEAN CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR SUSTAINABLE WATER TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Draw solution; Forward osmosis; Reverse solute leakage; Wastewater

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION;

DRAW SOLUTIONS; DRIVING FORCES; ENERGY REQUIREMENTS; EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS; FORWARD OSMOSIS; GLYCINE BETAINE; MASS TRANSFER MODELING; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY;

OSMOSIS;

AMPHOLYTE; BETAINE; GLUTAMINE; GLYCINE; PROLINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; WATER;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; DIFFUSION; ENERGY BALANCE; FORWARD OSMOSIS; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYDROPHOBICITY; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; OSMOSIS; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PH; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLUBILITY; SOLUTE; VISCOSITY; WASTE WATER; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER TRANSPORT;

EID: 84896131170     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.032     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Zhao S., Zou L., Tang C.Y., Mulcahy D. Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 396:1-21.
2. Phillip W.A., Yong J.S., Elimelech M. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:5170-5176.
3. Yong J.S., Phillip W.A., Elimelech M. Coupled reverse draw solute permeation and water flux in forward osmosis with neutral draw solutes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 392-393:9-17.
4. Ge Q., Su J., Amy G.L., Chung T.-S. Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes. Water Res. 2012, 46:1318-1326.
5. Cath T.Y., Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:70-87.
6. Cornelissen E.R., Harmsen D., de Korte K.F., Ruiken C.J., Qin J.J., Oo H., Wessels L.P. Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 319:158-168.
7. Ling M.M., Wang K.Y., Chung T.S. Highly water-soluble magnetic nanoparticles as novel draw solutes in forward osmosis for water reuse. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49:5869-5876.
8. Li D., Zhang X., Yao J., Simon G.P., Wang H. Stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a new class of draw agent for forward osmosis desalination. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47:1710-1712.
9. Bowden K.S., Achilli A., Childress A.E. Organic ionic salt draw solutions for osmotic membrane bioreactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 122:207-216.
10. Su J., Chung T.-S., Helmer B.J., de Wit J.S. Enhanced double-skinned FO membranes with inner dense layer for wastewater treatment and macromolecule recycle using Sucrose as draw solute. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 396:92-100.
11. Klaysom C., Cath T.Y., Depuydt T., Vankelecom I.F.J. Forward and pressure retarded osmosis: potential solutions for global challenges in energy and water supply. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42:6959-6989.
12. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Marchand E.A., Childress A.E. The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: a low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination 2009, 238:10-21.
13. Holloway R.W., Childress A.E., Dennett K.E., Cath T.Y. Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. Water Res. 2007, 41:4005-4014.
14. Lutchmiah K., Cornelissen E.R., Harmsen D.J.H., Post J.W., Lampi K., Ramaekers H., Rietveld L.C., Roest K. Water recovery from sewage using forward osmosis. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 64:1443-1449.
15. Ghosh S., Pohland F.G. Kinetics of substrate assimilation and product formation in anaerobic digestion. J. (Water Pollut. Control Fed.) 1974, 46:748-759.
16. 4Cl salt levels on methanogenic associations. Water Res. 1984, 18:543-548.
17. Pavlostathis S.G., Giraldo-Gomez E. Kinetics of anaerobic treatment: a critical review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 1991, 21:411-490.
18. Lefebvre O., Moletta R. Treatment of organic pollution in industrial saline wastewater: a literature review. Water Res. 2006, 40:3671-3682.
19. Yerkes D.W., Boonyakitsombut S., Speece R.E. Antagonism of sodium toxicity by the compatible solute betaine in anaerobic methanogenic systems. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 36:15-24.
20. Yancey P.H. Organic osmolytes as compatible, metabolic and counteracting cytoprotectants in high osmolarity and other stresses. J. Exp. Biol. 2005, 208:2819-2830.
21. Oh G., Zhang L., Jahng D. Osmoprotectants enhance methane production from the anaerobic digestion of food wastes containing a high content of salt. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2008, 83:1204-1210.
22. Kopyra J., Abdoul-Carime H. Dissociation of gaseous zwitterion glycine-betaine by slow electrons. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132:204302.
23. Kol S., Merlo M.E., Scheltema R.A., Vries M.d., Vonk R.J., Kikkert N.A., Dijkhuizen L., Breitling R., Takano E. Metabolomic characterization of the salt stress response in streptomyces coelicolor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76:2574-2581.
24. Lay W.C.L., Zhang Q., Zhang J., McDougald D., Tang C., Wang R., Liu Y., Fane A.G. Study of integration of forward osmosis and biological process: membrane performance under elevated salt environment. Desalination 2011, 283:123-130.
25. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination 2005, 174:1-11.
26. E.R. Cornelissen, J.B. van Lier, K. Lutchmiah and C. Roest, Solution Comprising an Osmotic Agent and Method of Extracting Water Using Said Solution, Google Patents (WO2013036111 A1), 2013.
27. Sigma-Aldrich, MSDS Database, 2012. http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/.
28. Lobo V.M.M., Quaresma J.L. Handbook of Electrolyte Solutions, Part A 1989, Elsevier.
29. Civera M., Fornili A., Sironi M., Fornili S.L. Molecular dynamics simulation of aqueous solutions of glycine betaine. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 367:238-244.
30. ScienceLab.com Glycine 2011, MSDS, Houston, Texas.
31. Longsworth L.G. Diffusion measurements, at 25°, of aqueous solutions of amino acids, peptides and sugars. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75:5705-5709.
32. Sigma-Aldrich L-glutamine 2011, MSDS, France, 〈http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/〉.
33. ChemicalBook, www.chemicalbook.com, 2008.
34. Wilson A.D., Stewart F.F. Deriving osmotic pressures of draw solutes used in osmotically driven membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 431:205-211.
35. v.d.Kooij D., Veenendaal H.R. Biomass production potential of materials in contact with drinking water: method and practical importance. Water Sci. Technol.: Water Supply 2001, 1:39-45.
36. Magic-Knezev A., van der Kooij D. Optimisation and significance of ATP analysis for measuring active biomass in granular activated carbon filters used in water treatment. Water Res. 2004, 38:3971-3979.
37. Nawaz M.S., Gadelha G., Khan S.J., Hankins N. Microbial toxicity effects of reverse transported draw solute in the forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (FO-MBR). J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 429:323-329.
38. Adham S., Oppenheimer J., Liu L., Kumar M. Dewatering reverse osmosis concentrate from water reuse applications using forward osmosis. WateReuse Foundation Research Report 2007, WateReuse Foundation Research, US.
39. Civera M., Sironi M., Fornili S.L. Unusual properties of aqueous solutions of l-proline: a molecular dynamics study. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005, 415:274-278.
40. Ng H.Y., Tang W., Wong W.S. Performance of forward (direct) osmosis process: membrane structure and transport phenomenon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:2408-2413.
41. Zhao S., Zou L. Relating solution physicochemical properties to internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 379:459-467.
42. Hancock N.T., Cath T.Y. Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:6769-6775.
43. Tan C.H., Ng H.Y. Revised external and internal concentration polarization models to improve flux prediction in forward osmosis process. Desalination 2013, 309:125-140.
44. Fennema O.R. Food Chemistry 1996, Marcel Dekker. 3rd ed.
45. Tarleton E.S., Robinson J.P., Millington C.R., Nijmeijer A., Taylor M.L. The influence of polarity on flux and rejection behaviour in solvent resistant nanofiltration - experimental observations. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:318-327.
46. Jin X., Shan J., Wang C., Wei J., Tang C.Y. Rejection of pharmaceuticals by forward osmosis membranes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 227-228:55-61.
47. Verliefde A.R.D., Heijman S.G.J., Cornelissen E.R., Amy G., Van der Bruggen B., van Dijk J.C. Influence of electrostatic interactions on the rejection with NF and assessment of the removal efficiency during NF/GAC treatment of pharmaceutically active compounds in surface water. Water Res. 2007, 41:3227-3240.
48. Kiso Y. Factors affecting adsorption of organic solutes on cellulose acetate in an aqueous solution system. Chromatographia 1986, 22:55-58.
49. Royal Society of Chemistry, ChemSpider, www.chemspider.com, Cambridge.
50. D. Quick, HTI s Revolutionary Forward Osmosis Filtration System, Gizmag, 2007.
51. Kim T.-U., Drewes J.E., Scott Summers R., Amy G.L. Solute transport model for trace organic neutral and charged compounds through nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. Water Res. 2007, 41:3977-3988.
52. Lee K.L., Baker R.W., Lonsdale H.K. Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 1981, 8:141-171.
53. Loeb S., Titelman L., Korngold E., Freiman J. Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 129:243-249.
54. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:237-247.
55. Tang C.Y., She Q., Lay W.C.L., Wang R., Fane A.G. Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 354:123-133.
56. Yin Yip N., Tiraferri A., Phillip W.A., Schiffman J.D., Elimelech M. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:3812-3818.
57. Song X., Liu Z., Sun D.D. Nano gives the answer: breaking the bottleneck of internal concentration polarization with a nanofiber composite forward osmosis membrane for a high water production rate. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23:3256-3260.
58. Park M., Lee J.J., Lee S., Kim J.H. Determination of a constant membrane structure parameter in forward osmosis processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, (in press).
59. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Childress A.E. Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 364:233-241.
60. Kim T.-w., Park S., Yeh K. Cost-effective design of a draw solution recovery process for forward osmosis desalination. Desalination 2013, 327:46-51.
61. Semiat R. Energy issues in desalination processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:8193-8201.
62. Semiat R., Sapoznik J., Hasson D. Energy aspects in osmotic processes. Desalin. Water Treat. 2010, 15:228-235.
63. Elimelech M., Phillip W.A. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 2011, 333:712-717.
64. Khaydarov R.A., Khaydarov R.R. Solar powered direct osmosis desalination. Desalination 2007, 217:225-232.
65. J.R.Herron, E.G.Beaudry, C.E.Jochums, L.E.Medina, Osmotic Concentration Apparatus and Method for Direct Osmotic Concentration of Fruit Juices, Patent no. 5281430, US, 1994.
66. Hassan A.M., Al-Sofi M.A.K., Al-Amoudi A.S., Jamaluddin A.T.M., Farooque A.M., Rowaili A., Dalvi A.G.I., Kither N.M., Mustafa G.M., Al-Tisan I.A.R. A new approach to membrane and thermal seawater desalination processes using nanofiltration membranes (Part 1). Desalination 1998, 118:35-51.
67. Feijoo G., Soto M., Méndez R., Lema J.M. Sodium inhibition in the anaerobic digestion process: antagonism and adaptation phenomena. Enzyme Microb. Technol 1995, 17:180-188.
68. Mahajan S., Tuteja N. Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2005, 444:139-158.
69. López-Vázquez C.M., Hooijmans C.M., Brdjanovic D., Gijzen H.J., van Loosdrecht M.C.M. Factors affecting the microbial populations at full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) wastewater treatment plants in The Netherlands. Water Res. 2008, 42:2349-2360.
70. Shizas I., Bagley D. Experimental determination of energy content of unknown organics in municipal wastewater streams. J. Energy Eng. 2004, 130:45-53.