Non-naturalized alien plants receive fewer flower visits than naturalized and native plants in a Swiss botanical garden

Biological Conservation

Volumn 182, Issue , 2015, Pages 109-116

  Razanajatovo, Mialy ^a   Föhr, Christine ^b   Fischer, Markus ^b   Prati, Daniel ^b   van Kleunen, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biological invasions; Botanic garden; Exotic species; Phylogenetic correction; Plant insect interactions; Pollinator generalization

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; FLOWER VISITING; GARDEN; HABITAT CONSERVATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; NATURALIZATION; PHYLOGENETICS; PLANT-INSECT INTERACTION;

BERN [SWITZERLAND]; SWITZERLAND;

ANIMALIA; HEXAPODA;

EID: 84917707001     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.043     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Baker H.G. Self-compatibility and establishment after long distance dispersal. Evolution 1955, 9:347-349.
2. Bates, D., Maechler, M., 2009. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-32.
3. Brown B.J., Mitchell R.J., Graham S.A. Competition for pollination between an invasive species (purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology 2002, 83:2328-2336.
4. Chittka L., Schurkens S. Successful invasion of a floral market - an exotic Asian plant has moved in on Europe's river-banks by bribing pollinators. Nature 2001, 411:653.
5. Chrobock T., Kempel A., Fischer M., van Kleunen M. Introduction bias: cultivated alien plant species germinate faster and more abundantly than native species in Switzerland. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2011, 12:244-250.
6. Chrobock T., Weiner C.N., Werner M., Bluethgen N., Fischer M., van Kleunen M. Effects of native pollinator specialization, self-compatibility and flowering duration of European plant species on their invasiveness elsewhere. J. Ecol. 2013, 101:916-923.
7. Chrobock T., Winiger P., Fischer M., van Kleunen M. The cobblers stick to their lasts: pollinators prefer native over alien plant species in a multi-species experiment. Biol. Invasions 2013, 15:2577-2588.
8. Dicks L., Corbet S., Pywell R. Compartmentalization in plant-insect flower visitor webs. J. Anim. Ecol. 2002, 71:32-43.
9. Faegri K., Van der Pijl L. The Principles of Pollination Ecology 1966, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
10. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 1985, 125:1-15.
11. Freckleton R., Harvey P., Pagel M. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 2002, 160:712-726.
12. Grafen A. The phylogenetic regression. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 1989, 326:119-157.
13. Hanley M.E., Awbi A.J., Franco M. Going native? Flower use by bumblebees in English urban gardens. Ann. Bot. 2014, 113:799-806.
14. Harmon-Threatt A.N., Burns J.H., Shemyakina L.A., Knight T.M. Breeding system and pollination ecology of introduced plants compared to their native relatives. Am. J. Bot. 2009, 96:1544-1550.
15. Herrera C.M. Pollinator abundance, morphology, and flower visitation rate: analysis of the "quantity" component in a plant-pollinator system. Oecologia 1989, 80:241-248.
16. Hsu P.-S., Yang E.-C. The critical cue in pattern discrimination for the honey bee: color or form?. J. Insect Physiol. 2012, 58:934-940.
17. Hulme P.E. Addressing the threat to biodiversity from botanic gardens. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:168-174.
18. Jasieński M., Bazzaz F.A. The fallacy of ratios and the testability of models in biology. Oikos 1999, 84:321-326.
19. Kaiser-Bunbury C.N., Valentin T., Mougal J., Matatiken D., Ghazoul J. The tolerance of island plant-pollinator networks to alien plants. J. Ecol. 2011, 99:202-213.
20. Kevan P., Baker H. Insects as flower visitors and pollinators. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1983, 28:407-453.
21. King V.M., Sargent R.D. Presence of an invasive plant species alters pollinator visitation to a native. Biol. Invasions 2012, 14:1809-1818.
22. Laird N.M., Ware J.H. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 1982, 38:963-974.
23. Lauber, K., Wagner, G., 2007. Flora Helvetica, 3e éd. Traduction de l'allemand et adaptation E. Gfeller, Haupt, Berne-Stuttgart-Vienne.
24. Lopezaraiza-Mikel M.E., Hayes R.B., Whalley M.R., Memmott J. The impact of an alien plant on a native plant-pollinator network: an experimental approach. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:539-550.
25. Lunn D.J., Thomas A., Best N., Spiegelhalter D. WinBUGS-a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat. Comput. 2000, 10:325-337.
26. Memmott J., Waser N.M. Integration of alien plants into a native flower-pollinator visitation web. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 2002, 269:2395-2399.
27. Molina-Montenegro M.A., Badano E.I., Cavieres L.A. Positive interactions among plant species for pollinator service: assessing the 'magnet species' concept with invasive species. Oikos 2008, 117:1833-1839.
28. Morales C.L., Aizen M.A. Invasive mutualisms and the structure of plant-pollinator interactions in the temperate forests of north-west Patagonia, Argentina. J. Ecol. 2006, 94:171-180.
29. Morales C.L., Traveset A. A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:716-728.
30. Ntzoufras I. Bayesian Modeling using WinBUGS 2011, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey.
31. Ollerton J., Killick A., Lamborn E., Watts S., Whiston M. Multiple meanings and modes: on the many ways to be a generalist flower. Taxon 2007, 56:717-728.
32. Ollerton J., Watts S., Connerty S., Lock J., Parker L., Wilson I., Schueller S.K., Nattero J., Cocucci A.A., Izhaki I. Pollination ecology of the invasive tree tobacco Nicotiana glauca: comparisons across native and non-native ranges. J. Pollination Ecol. 2012, 9:85-95.
33. Ollerton J., Winfree R., Tarrant S. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals?. Oikos 2011, 120:321-326.
34. Ornelas J., Ordano M., De-Nova A., Quintero M., Garland T. Phylogenetic analysis of interspecific variation in nectar of hummingbird-visited plants. J. Evol. Biol. 2007, 20:1904-1917.
35. Paradis E., Claude J., Strimmer K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:289-290.
36. Pimentel D., Lach L., Zuniga R., Morrison D. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 2000, 50:53-65.
37. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., Team, T.R.D.C., 2013. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3, pp. 1-108.
38. Primack R.B., Miller-Rushing A.J. The role of botanical gardens in climate change research. New Phytol. 2009, 182:303-313.
39. Core Team R. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2012, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
40. Richardson D.M., Allsopp N., D'Antonio C.M., Milton S.J., Rejmanek M. Plant invasions - the role of mutualisms. Biol. Rev. 2000, 75:65-93.
41. Rodger J.G., van Kleunen M., Johnson S.D. Does specialized pollination impede plant invasions?. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 171:382-391.
42. Rodger J.G., van Kleunen M., Johnson S.D. Pollinators, mates and Allee effects: the importance of self-pollination for fecundity in an invasive lily. Funct. Ecol. 2013, 27:1023-1033.
43. Schemske D.W., Bradshaw H. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96:11910-11915.
44. Schielzeth H. Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2010, 1:103-113.
45. Tutin T., Heywood V., Burges N., Valentine D., Walters S., Webb D. Flora Europaea 1980, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1964-1980).
46. van Kleunen M., Dawson W., Bossdorf O., Fischer M. The more the merrier: multi-species experiments in ecology. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2014, 15:1-9.
47. van Kleunen M., Dawson W., Schlaepfer D., Jeschke J.M., Fischer M. Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:947-958.
48. van Kleunen M., Johnson S.D., Fischer M. Predicting naturalization of southern African Iridaceae in other regions. J. Appl. Ecol. 2007, 44:594-603.
49. van Kleunen M., Manning J.C., Pasqualetto V., Johnson S.D. Phylogenetically independent associations between autonomous self-fertilization and plant invasiveness. Am. Nat. 2008, 171:195-201.
50. van Kleunen M., Nanni I., Donaldson J.S., Manning J.C. The role of beetle marks and flower colour on visitation by monkey beetles (Hopliini) in the greater cape floral region, South Africa. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100:1483-1489.
51. Vázquez D.P., Morris W.F., Jordano P. Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:1088-1094.
52. Vilà M., Bartomeus I., Dietzsch A.C., Petanidou T., Steffan-Dewenter I., Stout J.C., Tscheulin T. Invasive plant integration into native plant-pollinator networks across Europe. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 276:3887-3893.
53. Vilà M., Espinar J.L., Hejda M., Hulme P.E., Jarošík V., Maron J.L., Pergl J., Schaffner U., Sun Y., Pyšek P. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:702-708.
54. Vitousek P.M., D'Antonio C.M., Loope L.L., Rejmanek M., Westbrooks R. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. N.Z. J. Ecol. 1997, 21:1-16.
55. Webb C.O., Donoghue M.J. Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2005, 5:181-183.
56. Wikström N., Savolainen V., Chase M.W. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 2001, 268:2211-2220.
57. Zuur A., Ieno E., Walker N., Saveliev A., Smith G. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R 2009, Springer, New York.