Effects of native pollinator specialization, self-compatibility and flowering duration of European plant species on their invasiveness elsewhere

Journal of Ecology

Volumn 101, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 916-923

  Chrobock, Thomas ^a,d   Weiner, Christiane N ^b   Werner, Michael ^b   Blüthgen, Nico ^b,e   Fischer, Markus ^a   van Kleunen, Mark ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^d Carl Zeiss Naturzentrum Amrum   (Switzerland)

^e DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Distribution; Flowering period; Generalization; Introduced range; Invasion ecology; Plant invasion; Plant pollinator interaction; Pollinators; Self fertilization; Specialization

Indexed keywords

FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); FLOWERING; GRASSLAND; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; NUMERICAL MODEL; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLLINATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIALIZATION;

GERMANY;

EID: 84879566916     PISSN: 00220477     EISSN: 13652745     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12107     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Baker, H.G. (1955) Self-compatibility and establishment after "long-distance" dispersal. Evolution, 9, 347-349.
2. Baker, H.G. (1974) The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5, 1-24.
3. Binda-Emonds, O.R.P., Jones, K.E., Price, S.A., Grenyer, R., Cardillo, M., Habib, M., Purvis, A. & Gittleman, J.L. (2003) Supertrees are a necessary not-so-evil: a comment on Gatesy et al. Systematic Biology, 52, 724-729.
4. Blackburn, T.M., Pyšek, P., Bacher, S., Carlton, J.T., Duncan, R.P., Jarošik, V., Wilson, J.R.U. & Richardson, D.M. (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26, 333-339.
5. Blüthgen, N. (2010) Why network analysis is often disconnected from community ecology: a critique and an ecologist's guide. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11, 185-195.
6. Blüthgen, N., Menzel, F. & Blüthgen, N. (2006) Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecology, 6, 9.
7. Blüthgen, N., Menzel, F., Hovestadt, T., Fiala, B. & Blüthgen, N. (2007) Specialization, constraints, and conflicting interests in mutualistic networks. Current Biology, 17, 341-346.
8. Burns, J.H., Ashman, T.-L., Steets, J.A., Harmon-Threatt, A. & Knight, T.A. (2011) A phylogenetically controlled analysis of the roles of reproductive traits in plant invasions. Oecologia, 166, 1009-1017.
9. Cadotte, M.W. & Lovett-Doust, J. (2001) Ecological and taxonomic differences between native and introduced plants of southwestern Ontario. Ecoscience, 8, 388-395.
10. Chrobock, T., Kempel, A., Fischer, M. & van Kleunen, M. (2011) Introduction bias: cultivated alien plant species germinate faster and more abundantly than native species in Switzerland. Basic and Applied Ecology, 12, 244-250.
11. Dicks, L.V., Corbet, S.A. & Pywell, R.F. (2002) Compartmentalization in plant-insect flower visitor webs. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71, 32-43.
12. Dormann, C.F., Gruber, B. & Fründ, J. (2008) Introducing the bipartite package: analysing ecological networks. R News, 8/2, 8-11.
13. Dormann, C.F., Fründ, J., Blüthgen, N. & Gruber, B. (2009) Indices, graphs and null models: analyzing bipartite ecological networks. Open Ecology Journal, 2, 7-24.
14. Durka, W. & Michalski, S.G. (2012) DaPhnE - a dated phylogeny of a large European flora for phylogenetically informed ecological analyses. Ecology, 93, 2297-2297.
15. Felsenstein, J. (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist, 125, 1-15.
16. Fenster, C.B., Armbruster, W.S., Wilson, P., Dudash, M.R. & Thomson, J.D. (2004) Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35, 375-403.
17. Fischer, M., Bossdorf, O., Gockel, S., Hänsel, F., Hemp, A., Hessenmöller, D. et al. (2010) Implementing large-scale and long-term functional biodiversity research: the biodiversity exploratories. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11, 473-485.
18. Fontaine, C., Thébault, E. & Dajoz, I. (2009) Are insect pollinators more generalist than insect herbivores? Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 276, 3027-3033.
19. Fuentes, N., Ugarte, E., Kühn, I. & Klotz, S. (2010) Alien plants in southern South America. A framework for evaluation and management of mutual risk of invasion between Chile and Argentina. Biological Invasions, 12, 3227-3236.
20. Garland, T. Jr & Ives, A.R. (2000) Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. American Naturalist, 155, 346-364.
21. Grafen, A. (1989) The phylogenetic regression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 326, 119-157.
22. Gross, C.L., Gorrell, L., MacDonald, M.J. & Fatemi, M. (2010) Honeybees facilitate the invasion of Phyla canescens (Verbenaceae) in Australia - no bees, no seed!. Weed Research, 50, 364-372.
23. Hao, J.H., Qiang, S., Chrobock, T., van Kleunen, M. & Liu, Q.Q. (2011) A test of Baker's Law: breeding systems of invasive species of Asteraceae in China. Biological Invasions, 13, 571-580.
24. van Kleunen, M. & Johnson, S.D. (2007) Effects of self-compatibility on the distribution range of invasive European plants in North America. Conservation Biology, 21, 1537-1544.
25. van Kleunen, M., Manning, J.C., Pasqualetto, V. & Johnson, S.D. (2008) Phylogenetically independent associations between autonomous self-fertilization and plant invasiveness. The American Naturalist, 171, 195-201.
26. van Kleunen, M., Dawson, W., Schlaepfer, D., Jeschke, J.M. & Fischer, M. (2010) Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecology Letters, 13, 947-958.
27. Klotz, S., Kühn, I. & Durka, W. (2002) BiolFlor - eine Datenbank zu biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen der Gefässpflanzen in Deutschland. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde, 38. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, Germany.
28. Knapp, S. & Kühn, I. (2012) Origin matters: widely distributed native and non-native species benefit from different functional traits. Ecology Letters, 15, 696-703, doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01787.x.
29. Küster, E.C., Kühn, I., Bruelheide, H. & Klotz, S. (2008) Trait interactions help to explain plant invasion success in the German flora. Journal of Ecology, 96, 860-868.
30. Lake, J.C. & Leishman, M.R. (2004) Invasion success of exotic plants in natural ecosystems: the role of disturbance, plant attributes and freedom from herbivores. Biological Conservation, 117, 215-226.
31. Lloret, F., Médail, F., Brundu, G., Camarda, I., Moragues, E., Rita, J., Lambdon, P. & Hulme, P.E. (2005) Species attributes and invasion success by alien plants on Mediterranean islands. Journal of Ecology, 93, 512-520.
32. Memmott, J. & Waser, N.M. (2002) Integration of alien plants into a native flower-pollinator visitation web. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 269, 2395-2399.
33. Muñoz, A.A. & Cavieres, L.A. (2008) The presence of a showy invasive plant disrupts pollinator service and reproductive output in native alpine species only at high densities. Journal of Ecology, 96, 459-467.
34. Muth, N.Z. & Pigliucci, M. (2006) Traits of invasives reconsidered: phenotypic comparisons of introduced invasive and introduced noninvasive plant species within two closely related clades. American Journal of Botany, 93, 188-196.
35. Ne'eman, G., Jürgens, A., Newstrom-Lloyd, L., Potts, S.G. & Dafni, A. (2010) A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency. Biological Reviews, 85, 435-541.
36. Ollerton, J., Winfree, R. & Tarrant, S. (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos, 120, 321-326.
37. Ollerton, J., Killick, A., Lamborn, E., Watts, S. & Whiston, M. (2007) Multiple meanings and modes: on the many ways to be a generalist flower. Taxon, 56, 717-728.
38. Ollerton, J., Watts, S., Connerty, S., Lock, J., Parker, L., Wilson, I. et al. (2012) Pollination ecology of the invasive tree tobacco Nicotiana glauca: comparisons across native and non-native ranges. Journal of Pollination Ecology, 9, 85-95.
39. Pagel, M. (1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature, 401, 877-884.
40. Parker, I.M. (1997) Pollinator limitation of Cytisus scoparius (Scotch broom), an invasive exotic shrub. Ecology, 78, 1457-1470.
41. Parker, I.M. & Haubensak, K.A. (2002) Comparative pollinator limitation of two non-native shrubs: do mutualisms influence invasions? Oecologia, 130, 250-258.
42. Pattemore, D.E. & Wilcove, D.S. (2012) Invasive rats and recent colonist birds partially compensate for the loss of endemic New Zealand pollinators. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 279, 1597-1605.
43. Pheloung, P.C., Williams, P.A. & Halloy, S.R. (1999) A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating introductions. Journal of Environmental Management, 57, 239-251.
44. Pinheiro, J.C. & Bates, D.M. (2000) Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Springer Verlag New York, USA.
45. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S. & Sarkar, D. & the R Development Core Team (2012) nlme: linear and non-linear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-103.
46. Pyšek, P., Jarošik, V., Chytry, M., Danihelka, J., Kühn, I., Pergl, J., Tichý, L., Biesmeijer, J.C., Ellis, W.E., Kunin, W.E. & Stettele, J. (2011) Successful invaders co-opt pollinators of native flora and accumulate insect pollinators with increasing residence time. Ecological Monographs, 81, 277-293.
47. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
48. Rambuda, T.D. & Johnson, S.D. (2004) Breeding systems of invasive alien plants in South Africa: does Baker's rule apply? Diversity and Distributions, 10, 409-416.
49. Richardson, D.M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M.G., Panetta, D. & West, C.J. (2000a) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions, 6, 93-107.
50. Richardson, D.M., Allsopp, N., D'Antonio, C.M., Milton, S.J. & Rejmánek, M. (2000b) Plant invasions - the role of mutualisms. Biological Reviews, 75, 65-93.
51. Rodger, J.G., van Kleunen, M. & Johnson, S.D. (2010) Does specialized pollination impede plant invasions? International Journal of Plant Sciences, 171, 382-391.
52. Schielzeth, H. (2010) Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1, 103-113.
53. Stang, M., Klinkhamer, P.G.L. & van der Meijden, E. (2006) Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number of interactions in a plant-flower visitor web. Oikos, 112, 111-121.
54. Stout, J.C., Kells, A.R. & Goulson, D. (2002) Pollination of the invasive exotic shrub Lupinus arboreus (Fabaceae) by introduced bees in Tasmania. Biological Conservation, 106, 425-434.
55. Sutherland, S. (2004) What makes a weed a weed: life history traits of native and exotic plants in the USA. Oecologia, 141, 24-39.
56. Vázquez, D.P., Morris, W.F. & Jordano, P. (2005) Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants. Ecology Letters, 8, 1088-1094.
57. Viegi, L. (2001) Investigations on some reproductive features of invasive alien plants in Italy. Plant Invasions: Species Ecology and Management (eds. G. Brundu, J. Brock, I. Camarda, L. Child & M. Wade ), pp. 255-262. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.
58. Vilà, M., Bartomeus, I., Dietzsch, A.C., Petanidou, T., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Stout, J.C. & Tscheulin, T. (2009) Invasive plant integration into native plant-pollinator networks across Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 276, 3887-3893.
59. Warton, D.I. & Hui, F.K.C. (2011) The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology. Ecology, 92, 3-10.
60. Waser, N.M., Chittka, L., Price, M.V., Williams, N.M. & Ollerton, J. (1996) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology, 77, 1043-1060.
61. Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N., Walker, N.J., Savaliev, A.A. & Smith, G.M. (2009) Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, USA.