Comparison of the kinetic performance and retentivity of sub-2μm core-shell, hybrid and conventional bare silica phases in hydrophilic interaction chromatography

Journal of Chromatography A

Volumn 1371, Issue , 2014, Pages 106-116

  Heaton, James C ^a   McCalley, David V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Buffers; Column efficiency; Core shell; Diffusion; HILIC

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION; EFFICIENCY; HYDROPHILICITY; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; POROUS MATERIALS; RAILROAD CAR BUFFERS; SILICA;

COLUMN EFFICIENCY; CORE SHELL; EFFECTIVE MEDIUM THEORIES; HILIC; HYDROPHILIC INTERACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY; INTRA-PARTICLE DIFFUSION; ORGANIC/INORGANIC HYBRIDS; PHYSIO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES;

SHELLS (STRUCTURES);

BENZYLAMINE; CYTOSINE; DIPHENHYDRAMINE; NORTRIPTYLINE; PHENYLEPHRINE; PROCAINAMIDE; PROPRANOLOL; SILICON DIOXIDE; ION;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; ELUTION; FLOW RATE; HYDROPHILIC INTERACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY; HYDROPHILICITY; IONIC RETENTION; PARTICLE SIZE; POROSITY; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; KINETICS;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; IONS; KINETICS; POROSITY; SILICON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84917696259     PISSN: 00219673     EISSN: 18733778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alpert A.J. Hydrophilic-interaction chromatography for the separation of peptides, nucleic acids and other polar compounds. J. Chromatogr. 1990, 499:177-196.
2. McCalley D.V. Is hydrophilic interaction chromatography with silica columns a viable alternative to reversed-phase liquid chromatography for the analysis of ionisable compounds?. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1171:46-55.
3. McCalley D.V. The challenges of the analysis of basic compounds by high performance liquid chromatography: some possible approaches for improved separations. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:858-880.
4. McCalley D.V. Evaluation of the properties of a superficially porous silica stationary phase in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1193:85-91.
5. Horvath C.G., Preiss B.A., Lipsky S.R. Fast liquid chromatography. Investigation of operating parameters and the separation of nucleotides on pellicular ion exchangers. Anal. Chem. 1967, 39:1422-1428.
6. Kirkland J.J. Controlled surface porosity supports for high-speed gas and liquid chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1969, 41:218-220.
7. Cunliffe J.M., Maloney T.D. Fused-core particle technology as an alternative to sub-2-microm particles to achieve high separation efficiency with low backpressure. J. Sep. Sci. 2007, 30:3104-3109.
8. McCalley D.V. Instrumental considerations for the effective operation of short, highly efficient fused-core columns. Investigation of performance at high flow rates and elevated temperatures. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:4561-4567.
9. Cabooter D., Fanigliulo A., Bellazzi G., Allieri B., Rottigni A., Desmet G. Relationship between the particle size distribution of commercial fully porous and superficially porous high-performance liquid chromatography column packings and their chromatographic performance. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:7074-7081.
10. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Comparison of heat friction effects in narrow-bore columns packed with core-shell and totally porous particles. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2010, 65:6310-6319.
11. Blue L.E., Jorgenson J.W. 1.1μm superficially porous particles for liquid chromatography. Part I: synthesis and particle structure characterization. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:7989-7995.
12. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Comparative study of the performance of columns packed with several new fine silica particles. Would the external roughness of the particles affect column properties?. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1166:30-46.
13. Deridder S., Desmet G. Effective medium theory expressions for the effective diffusion in chromatographic beds filled with porous, non-porous and porous-shell particles and cylinders. Part II: Numerical verification and quantitative effect of solid core on expected B-term band. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:46-56.
14. Liekens A., Denayer J., Desmet G. Experimental investigation of the difference in B-term dominated band broadening between fully porous and porous-shell particles for liquid chromatography using the Effective Medium Theory. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:4406-4416.
15. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Mass transfer resistance in narrow-bore columns packed with 1.7 microm particles in very high pressure liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:5069-5083.
16. Wyndham K.D., O'Gara J.E., Walter T.H., Glose K.H., Lawrence N.L., Alden B.A., et al. Characterization and evaluation of C18 HPLC stationary phases based on ethyl-bridged hybrid organic/inorganic particles. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75:6781-6788.
17. Kumar A., Heaton J.C., McCalley D.V. Practical investigation of the factors that affect the selectivity in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1276:33-46.
18. Ludlum D.B., Warner R.C., Smith H.W. The diffusion of thiourea in water at 25°C. J. Phys. Chem. 1962, 66:1540-1542.
19. Dunlop P.J., Pepela C.N., Steel B.J. Diffusion study at 25.deg. with a shearing diffusiometer. Comparison with the Gouy and conductance methods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92:6743-6750.
20. McCalley D.V. Some practical comparisons of the efficiency and overloading behaviour of sub-2μm porous and sub-3μm shell particles in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:2887-2897.
21. Gritti F., Cavazzini A., Marchetti N., Guiochon G. Comparison between the efficiencies of columns packed with fully and partially porous C18-bonded silica materials. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1157:289-303.
22. Gritti F., Guiochon G. General HETP equation for the study of mass-transfer mechanisms in RPLC. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78:5329-5347.
23. Zhang Y., Wang X., Mukherjee P., Petersson P. Critical comparison of performances of superficially porous particles and sub-2 microm particles under optimized ultra-high pressure conditions. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216:4597-4605.
24. Fekete S., Guillarme D. Kinetic evaluation of new generation of column packed with 1.3μm core-shell particles. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1308:104-113.
25. Bobály B., Guillarme D., Fekete S. Systematic comparison of a new generation of columns packed with sub-2μm superficially porous particles. J. Sep. Sci. 2014, 37:189-197.
26. Gritti F., Shiner S.J., Fairchild J.N., Guiochon G. Evaluation of the kinetic performance of new prototype 2.1×100mm narrow-bore columns packed with 1.6μm superficially porous particles. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1334:30-43.
27. Desmet G., Clicq D., Gzil P. Geometry-independent plate height representation methods for the direct comparison of the kinetic performance of LC supports with a different size or morphology. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77:4058-4070.
28. Cabooter D., Billen J., Terryn H., Lynen F., Sandra P., Desmet G. Kinetic plot and particle size distribution analysis to discuss the performance limits of sub-2 micron and supra-2 micron particle columns. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1204:1-10.
29. Knox J.H., Scott H.P. B and C terms in the van Deemter equation for liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1983, 282:297-313.
30. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Mass transfer mechanism in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1302:55-64.
31. Gritti F., Guiochon G. Comparison between the intra-particle diffusivity in the hydrophilic interaction chromatography and reversed phase liquid chromatography modes. Impact on the column efficiency. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1297:85-95.
32. Heaton J.C., Wang X., Barber W.E., Buckenmaier S.M.C., McCalley D.V. Practical observations on the performance of bare silica in hydrophilic interaction compared with C18 reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1328:7-15.
33. Melnikov S.M., Hoeltzel A., Seidel-Morgenstern A., Tallarek U. A molecular dynamics study on the partitioning mechanism in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Angew.Chem.Int. Ed. 2012, 51:6251-6254.
34. Melnikov S.M., Hoeltzel A., Seidel-Morgenstern A., Tallarek U. How ternary mobile phases allow tuning of analyte retention in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85:8850-8856.
35. Desmet G., Deridder S. Effective medium theory expressions for the effective diffusion in chromatographic beds filled with porous, non-porous and porous-shell particles and cylinders. Part I: Theory. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:32-45.
36. Cox G.B., Stout R.W. Study of the retention mechanism for basic compounds on silica under pseudo-reversed-phase conditions. J. Chromatogr. 1987, 384:315-336.
37. McCalley D.V. Study of the selectivity, retention mechanisms and performance of alternative silica-based stationary phases for separation of ionised solutes in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217:3408-3417.
38. Dinh N.P., Jonsson T., Irgum K. Probing the interaction mode in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218:5880-5891.
39. Chen H., Horvath C. Rapid separation of proteins by reversed phase HPLC at elevated temperatures. Anal. Methods Instrum. 1993, 1:213-222.