Application of artificial neural networks in computer- aided diagnosis

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 1260, Issue , 2015, Pages 195-204

  Liu, Bei ^a  

^a CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network (ANN); CAD; Mammogram; Medical image; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ALGORITHM; BREAST DISEASES; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST DISEASES; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84917675909     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2239-0_12     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Eadie LH, Taylor P, Gibson AP (2012) A systematic review of computer-aided diagnosis in diagnostic cancer imaging. Eur J Radiol 81: e70–e76
2. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Lo JY et al (1996) Artificial neural network: improving the quality of breast biopsy recommendations. Radiology 198:131–135
3. Chan H, Sahiner B, Petrick N et al (1997) Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifi cations on mammograms: texture analysis using an artifi cial neural network. Phys Med Biol 42:549–567
4. Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA et al (1999) Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol 6: 22–33
5. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ et al (2002) Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis—observer study with independent database of mammograms. Radiology 224: 560–568
6. Suzuki K, Li F, Sone S et al (2005) Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for distinction between benign and malignant nodules in thoracic low-dose CT by use of massive training artifi cial neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24:1138–1150
7. Richard HH, Lippman RP (1991) Neural network classifi ers estimate Bayesian a posteriori probabilities. Neural Comput 3:461–483
8. Swingler K (1996) Applying neural networks: a practical guide. Academic, London
9. Berry MJA, Linoff G (1997) Data mining techniques. Wiley, New York
10. Rana RS, Jiang Y, Schmidt RA et al (2007) Independent evaluation of computer classifi cation of malignant and benign calcifi cations in full-fi eld digital mammograms. Acad Radiol 14:363–370
11. Swets JA (1978) ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. Invest Radiol 14:109–121
12. Metz CE (1986) ROC methodology in radio-logic imaging. Invest Radiol 21:720–733
13. Swets JA (1986) Forms of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: implication for theory and measurement of performance. Psychol Bull 99:181–198
14. Hanley JA (1988) The robustness of the binor-mal assumption used in fi tting ROC curves. Med Decis Making 8:197–203
15. Veldkamp WJH, Karssemeijer N (1996) Infl uence of segmentation on classifi cation of microcalcifi cations in digital mammography. IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, bridging disciplines for biomedicine, proceedings of the 18th annual international conference of the IEEE 3, pp 1171–1172
16. Paquerault S, Yarusso LM, Papaioannou J et al (2004) Radial gradient-based segmentation of mammographic microcalcifi cations: observer evaluation and effect on CAD performance. Med Phys 31:2648–2657
17. Shi J, Sahiner B, Chan HP et al (2008) Characterization of mammographic masses based on level set segmentation with new image features and patient information. Med Phys 35(1):280–290
18. Singh S, Maxwell J, Baker JA et al (2011) Computer-aided classifi cation of breast masses: performance and interobserver variability of expert radiologists versus residents. Radiology 258:73–80
19. Matignon R (2005) Neural network modeling using SAS enterprise miner. AuthorHouse, Bloomington
20. Way TW, Sahiner B, Hadjiiski LM et al (2010) Effect of fi nite sample size on feature selection and classifi cation: a simulation study. Med Phys 37(2):907–920
21. Rojas R, Feldman J (1996) Neural networks: a systematic introduction. Springer, New York
22. Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen JH (1998) Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously distributed data. Stat Med 17: 1033–1053
23. Salfi ty MF, Nishikawa RM, Jiang Y et al (2003) The use of priori information in the detection of mammographic microcalcifications to improve their classification. Med Phys 30:823–831
24. Rojas R (1996) A short proof of the posterior probability classifier neural networks. Neural Comput 8:41–43
25. Liu B, Jiang Y (2013) A multitarget training method for artificial neural network with application to computer-aided diagnosis. Med Phys 40:011908. doi: 10.1118/1.4772021
26. Rosen PP (2001) Rosen’s breast pathology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
27. Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Wolverton DE et al (1996) Malignant and benign clustered micro-calcifi cations: automated feature analysis and classifi cation. Radiology 198:671–678
28. Chan H, Sahiner B, Lam KL et al (1998) Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifi cations in morphological and texture feature spaces. Med Phys 25:2007–2019
29. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ (2001) Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20: 1285–1292
30. Metz CE, Shen J (1992) Gains in accuracy from replicated reading of diagnostic images: prediction and assessment in terms of ROC analysis. Med Decis Making 12:60–75
31. Liu B, Metz CE, Jiang Y (2004) An ROC comparison of four methods of combining information from multiple images of the same patient. Med Phys 31:2552–2563
32. Liu B, Metz CE, Jiang Y (2005) Effect of correlation on combining diagnostic information from two images of the same patient. Med Phys 32:3329–3338