Understanding learning in a postmodern world: Reconsidering the perry scheme of intellectual and ethical development

Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 17-36

  Moore, William S ^a  

^a Washington State Board for Community Technical Colleges   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917501482     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203424964     Document Type: Chapter

References (90)

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper & Row.
2. Airasian, P. W. & Walsh, M. E. (1997). Constructivist cautions. Phi Delta Kappan, February, 444-449.
3. Banks, J. (1994). Multiethnic education: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4. Barr, R. & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning-a new paradigm for undergraduate education Change, November/December, 1995, 13-25.
5. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students' intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Baxter Magolda, M., & Porterfield, W. (1985). A new approach to assess intellectual development on the Perry scheme. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26 (4), 343-351.
7. Belenky, M. F, Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
8. Benack, S.(1982). The coding of dimensions of epistemological thought in young men and women. Moral Education Forum, 7 (2), 3-23.
9. Bereiter, C. (1994). Implications of postmodernism for science, or science as progressive discourse. Educational Psychologist, 29, 3-12.
10. Berlak, H., Newmann, F M., Adams. E., Archbald, D. A., Burgess, T., Raven, J. & Romberg, T.A. (1992). Toward a new science of educational testing and assessment. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
11. Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorne, Victoria (Australia): Australian Council for Educational Research.
12. Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind: How higher education has failed democracy and impoverished the souls of today 's students. New York: Simon and Schuster.
13. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
14. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, January-February, 1989, 32-42.
15. Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. (1996). Stolen knowledge. In H. McLellan (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives. (pp. 47-56). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
16. Bruffee, K. (1993). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17. Burbules, N. C., & Rice, S. (1991). Dialogue across differences: Continuing the conversation. Harvard Educational Review, 61(4), November, 393-416.
18. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics ofempowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
19. Commons, M., Richards, F., & Armon, C. (1984). Beyondformal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development. New York: Praeger Press.
20. Commons, M. L., Sinnott, J. D., Richards, F. A., & Armon, C. (1989, 1990). Adult development, Vol. 1 & 2. New York: Praeger.
21. Cross, K. P. 1998. Opening windows on learning. The Cross Papers # 2. League for Innovation in the Community College & Educational Testing Service. http://www.league.org
22. Damarin, S. K. (1996). Schooling and situated knowledge: Travel or tourism? In H. McLellan (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives (p. 77-87). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
23. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23 (7), 5-12.
24. Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. New York: Nichols Publishing Company.
25. Fosnot, C. (1989). Enquiring teachers, enquiring learners: A constructivist approach to teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Fowler, J. (1981). Stages of faith: The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
27. Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
28. Gifford, B. R., & O'Connor, M. C. (Eds.). (1992). Changing assessments: Alternative views ofaptitude, achievement and instruction. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Gray, H. H. (1982). Five ways to wisdom. Time magazine, September 11, p. 70.
31. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
32. Harding, S., & Hintikka, M. (Eds.). (1983). Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
33. Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67 (1), 88-140.
34. Johnson, M. H. (1981). Some new thoughts on the Perry scheme. The Perry Newsletter, Spring, p.1-3.
35. Kegan, R. (1983). The evolving self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands ofmodern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. King, P. & Kitchener, K. S. (1993). The development of reflective thinking in the college years: The mixed results. In C. G. Schneider (Ed.), Strengthening the college major (pp. 25-42). New Directions for Higher Education, #84, Winter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38. King, P. M. & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39. Knefelkamp, L. L. (1974). Developmental instruction: Fostering intellectual and personal growth of college students. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
40. Knefelkamp, L. L. (1998). Introduction. In William G. Perry, Jr. Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years: A scheme. (p. 11-38). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41. Knefelkamp, L. L. & Slepitza, R. L. (1978). A cognitive-developmental model of career development:An adaptation of the Perry scheme. In C. A. Parker (Ed.), Encouraging development in college students(pp. 135-150). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
42. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy ofmoral development. San Francisco: Harper and Row.
43. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (ed.), Handbook ofsocialization: Theory and research(pp. 347-480). New York: RandMcNally.
44. Kohlberg, L., & Armon, C. (1984). Three types of stage models used in the study of adult development. In M. Commons, F. Richards, & C. Armon, Beyond formal operations(pp. 383-394). New York: Praeger Press.
45. Laurillard, D. (1979). The process of student learning. Higher Education, 8, 395-409.
46. Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London & New York: Routledge.
47. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. MacGregor, J. (Ed.) (1994). Student self-evaluations: Fostering reflective learning, New Directions for Teaching and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
50. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.
51. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: Outcome and process. British Journal ofEducational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
52. Marton, F., Dall' Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal ofEducational Research,277-300.
53. Marton, F., Hounsell, D., & Entwistle, N. J. (Eds.). (1984). The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
54. McLellan, H. (1996). Situated learning: Multiple perspectives. In H. McLellan (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives(pp. 5-17). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
55. Mines, R. A., & Kitchener, K. S. (Eds.). (1986). Adult cognitive development: Methods and models. New York: Praeger Press.
56. Minnich, E. K. (1990). Transforming knowledge. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
57. Moore, W.S. (1991). The Perry scheme of intellectual and ethical development: An introduction to the model and two major assessment approaches. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
58. Moore, W. S. (1994). Student and Faculty Epistemology in the College Classroom: The Perry Scheme of Intellectual and Ethical Development. In K. Pritchard & R. M. Sawyer (Eds.), Handbook of College Teaching(pp. 45-67). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
59. Moore, W. S. (1999). A developmental perspective on the theology of assessment: Moving from received belief to creative faith. Washington Assessment Group Newsletter, 8 (2), February, 1-6. ((http://www.sbctc.ctc.edu/BoardiEd/Outcomes/outcome.htm))
60. Musil, C. M. (Ed.). (1992). Students at the center: Feminist assessment. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.
61. National Research Council Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R., (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
62. Newmann, F. & Associates. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
63. Niemi, D. (1997). Cognitive science, expert-novice research, and performance assessment. Theory into Practice, 36 (4), Autumn, 239-246.
64. O'Loughlin, M. (1992). Rethinking science education: Beyond Piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 29 (8), 791-820.
65. Perry, W. G. (1974). Students as makers of meaning. Annual report of the Bureau of Study Counsel, Harvard University.
66. Perry, W. G. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In A. Chickering & Associates (Eds.), The Modern American College(pp. 76-116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
67. Perry, W. G. Jr. (1985). Perry's perplex: Issues unresolved and irresolvable. Notes to participants in the Project Match Conference, Davidson College, North Carolina, June, 1985. Perry
68. Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibrium ofcognitive structures. New York: Viking Press.
69. Ramsden, P. (1988) Improving learning: New perspectives. London: Kogan Page.
70. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. New York: Routledge.
71. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
72. Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Saljo, R. (1979). Learning in the learner's perspective: Some commonsense conceptions. Reports from the Department ofEducation, University ofGoteborg(Sweden), Number 76.
74. Sanford, N. (1969). Why Colleges Fail. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
75. Sass, L. (1990). Anthropology's native problems: revisionism in the field. Harper's magazine, May, 49-57.
76. Sigel, I. E., & Cocking, R. R. (1977). Cognitive development from childhood to adolescence: A constructivist perspective. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
77. Slepitza, R. (1984). Commitment within the Perry Scheme: A question of structural change. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland. 1983.
78. Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. (Eds.). (1995). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum Press.
79. Thompson, K. (1990). Learning at Evergreen: A study of cognitive development using the Perry model. Olympia, WA: The Evergreen State College Assessment Study Group, Report Number 1.
80. Torosyan, R. (1999). Applying learning to life: a theoretical framework in context. Et cetera, 56 (1), Spring, 3-24.
81. Van Hecke, M. L. (1990). Critical thinking and the Perry scheme: tangled spirals. Paper presented at the "Reflection and Anticipation: A Celebration of Two Decades of Work with the 'Perry Scheme'" conference. Washington, D.C., December, 1990.
82. Van Rossum, Erik J., & Diejkers, Rien A. (1984). Learning: Qualitative differences between novices and experts. Unpublished paper, Dept. of Educational Psychology, Tilburg University, the Netherlands, February, 1984.
83. Van Rossum, E. J., Diejkers, R. A. & Hamer, R. (1985). Students' learning conceptions and their interpretation of significant educational concepts. Higher Education, 14,617-641.
84. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the Mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85. Wiggins, G. P. (1993). Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
86. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
87. Williams, J. M. (1989). Afterword: Two ways of thinking about growth. In E. P. Maimon & B. F. Nodine (Eds.), Thinking, reasoning, and writing(pp. 245-255). New York: Longman.
88. Wilson, B. G. (1998). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
89. Wineburg, S. (1997). Beyond breadth and depth: Subject matter knowledge and assessment. Theory into Practice, 36 (4), 255-261.
90. Wolf, D., Bixby, J., Glenn, J., & Gardner, H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. Review ofResearch in Education, 17, 31-74.