Merit aid and the politics of education

Merit Aid and the Politics of Education

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-183

  Ness, Erik C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917118679     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203933688     Document Type: Book

References (160)

1. Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2002). Empty promises: The myth of college access in America. Washington, D.C.: Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance.
2. Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2001). Access denied: Restoring the nation's commitment to equal educational opportunity. Washington, D.C.: Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance.
3. Allison, G.T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston:Little, Brown and Company.
4. Anderson, J. (1984). Public policy-making. (3rd ed.). New York: Prager.
5. Barrilleaux, C., & Berkman, M. (2003). Do governors matter? Budgeting rules and the politics of state policymaking. Political Research Quarterly, 56 (4): 409-417.
6. Barke, R.P. (1993). Managing technological change in federal communications policy. In P. A. Sabatier and H.C. Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (Eds). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
7. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (Eds.). (2002). Policy dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Bell, A., & Anderson, R. (2004). Setting the Governmental Agenda to State Lottery Funded Tuition Scholarships. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Kansas City, Missouri.
10. Berry, F.S., & Berry, W.D. (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
11. Berry, F.S., & Berry, W.D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84 (2): 395-416.
12. Beyle, T. (2004). The governors. In V. Gray and R.L. Hanson (Eds.), Politics of the American states. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
13. Blackwell, E.A., & Cistone, P.J. (1999). Power and influence in higher education:The case of Florida. Higher Education Policy, 12 (2): 111-122.
14. Brewer, G.D., & deLeon, P. (1983). The foundations of policy analysis. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
15. Brisbin, R.A., Dilger, R.J., Hammock, A.S., & Mooney, C.Z. (1996). West Virginia politics and government. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
16. Brown, A.E., & Stewart, J. (1993). Competing advocacy coalitions, policy evolution and airline deregulation. In P. A. Sabatier and H.C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
17. California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987).
18. Callan, P. (2002). Losing ground: A national status report of the affordability of American higher education. San Jose, CA: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.
19. Callow, J. (2003, January 16). Tennessee lottery proposal would give students $4,000. The Daily News Journal.
20. Cheek, D. (2003, May 12). Eligibility for scholarship differs in two House bills. The Tennessean.
21. Clucas, R.A. (2001). Principal-agent theory and the theory of state house speakers. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26: 319-338.
22. Cobb, R., & Elder, C. (1983). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
23. Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (March): 1-25.
24. Coleman, R. (2000, December 1). Wise offers options to fund scholarships. Charleston Gazette. pp. P11A.
25. College Board. (2006a). Trends in college pricing. Washington, DC: College Board.
26. College Board. (2006b). Trends in student aid. Washington, DC: College Board.
27. Cook, C.E. (1998). Lobbying for higher education. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
28. Commins, J. (2003, May 23). Lottery scholarship bill goes to governor. Chattanooga Free Times Press. A1.
29. Commins, J. (2003, February 19). Bredesen seeks 9% reduction of budget. Chattanooga Free Times Press. A9.
30. Commins, J. (2002, June 13). Candidates reaction to CATS is mixed. Chattanooga Free Times Press. A9.
31. Commins, J. (2002, May 23). Income tax rejected. Chattanooga Free Times Press. A1.
32. Cornwell, C., Mustard, D.B., & Sridhar, D.J. (2006). The enrollment effects of merit-based financial aid: Evidence from Georgia's HOPE program. Journal of Labor Economics, 24 761-786.
33. Council of State Governments (CSG). (2003). The book of states. (Vol. 35). Lexington, KY: CSG.
34. Council of State Governments (CSG). (2002). The book of states. (Vol. 34). Lexington, KY: CSG.
35. Council of State Governments (CSG). (1995). The book of states. (Vol. 30). Lexington, KY: CSG.
36. Crain, W.M., & Miller, J.C. (2000). Budget process and spending growth. William and Mary Law Review, 31: 1021-1046.
37. Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Darnell, R.C. (2004). Tennessee blue book 2001-2004. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Department of State Publications Division.
39. Dee, T.S., & Jackson, L.A. (1999). Who loses HOPE? Attrition from Georgia's college scholarship program. Southern Economic Journal, 66 (2): 379-390.
40. deGive, M.L., & Olswang, S. (1999). Coalition building to create a branch campus system. Review of Higher Education, 22 (3): 287-313.
41. deLeon, P. (1999). The stages approach to the policy process. In P. A. Sabatier, (Ed.). Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
42. Dolan, C.J. (2003). Economic policy and decision making at the intersection of domestic and international politics: The advocacy coalition framework and the national economic council. Policy Studies Journal, 31 (2): 209-236.
43. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
44. Doyle, W.R. (2006). Adoption of merit-based student grant programs: An event history analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28 (3): 259-285.
45. Duffy, R. (1997). Nuclear politics in America. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
46. Dynarski, S. (2004). The new merit aid. In C.M. Hoxby (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Dynarski, S. (2000). Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance. National Tax Journal, 53 (3): 629-661.
48. Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.
49. Erlandson, D.A. et al. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
50. Fenno, R.F. (2003). Going home: Black representatives and their constituents. Chicago:University of Chicago Press..
51. Fenno, R.F. (1978). Home style. Boston: Little, Brown.
52. Fenno, R.F. (1973). Congressmen in committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
53. Frankel, T.C. (2001, April 4). Wise warns 'no Promise, no budget.' Charleston Daily Mail. pp. P1A.
54. Frankel, T.C., & Wallace, J. (2001, April 16). Odds good on gambling bill. Charleston Daily Mail. P1A.
55. Gallagher, M. (1995, March 2). Lottery push loses momentum. Albuquerque Journal. p. A1.
56. Gittell, M., & Kleiman, N.S. (2000). The political context of higher education. American Behavioral Scientist, 43 (7): 1058-1093.
57. Gormley, W.T. (1986). Regulatory policymaking in a federal system. Polity, 18 (4): 595-620.
58. Guthrie, J.W., & Koppich, J. (1994). Ready, A.I.M., reform: Building a model of education reform and 'high politics.' In H. Beare & W.L. Boyd (Eds.), Restructuring schools: An international perspective on the movement to transform the control and performance of schools. New York: Falmer Press.
59. Guston, D.H., Jones, M., & Branscomb, L.M. (1997). The demand for and supply of technical information and analysis in state legislatures. Policy Studies Journal, 25 (3): 451-469.
60. Haider-Markel, D.P., & Meier, K. (1996). The politics of gay and lesbian rights:Expanding the scope of the conflict. Journal of Politics, 58 (2): 322-349.
61. Hamm, K.E., & Moncrief, G.F. (2004). Legislative politics in the states. In V. Gray and R.L. Hanson (Eds.), Politics of the American States. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
62. Hannah, S.B. (1996). The Higher Education Act of 1992: Skills, constraints, and politics of higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67 (5): 498-527.
63. Hearn, J.C., & Griswold, C. P. (1994). State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16 (2): 161-190.
64. Hearn, J.C., & Holdsworth, J.M. (2004). Federal student aid: The shift from grants to loans. In E.P. St. John & M.D. Parsons (Eds.), Public Funding of Higher Education: Changing Contexts and New Rationales. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
65. Heild, C. (2005, January 2). Gambling has exploded in New Mexico over past decade. Albuquerque Journal.
66. Heller, D.E. (2004a). State merit scholarship programs: An overview. In Heller, D.E. and Marin, P. (Eds.) State merit scholarships and racial inequality. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
67. Heller, D.E. (2004b). The devil is in the details: An analysis of eligibility criteria for merit scholarships in Massachusetts. In Heller, D.E. and Marin, P. (Eds.) State merit scholarships and racial inequality. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
68. Heller, D.E. (2002a). State merit scholarship programs: An introduction. In Heller, D.E. and Marin, P. (Eds.) Who should we help? The negative social consequences of merit scholarships. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
69. Heller, D.E. (2002b). The policy shift in state financial aid programs. In J.C. Smart (Ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. (Vol. XVII). New York: Agathon Press.
70. Heller, D.E., & Marin, P. (Eds.) (2004). State merit scholarships and racial inequality. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
71. Heller, D.E., & Marin, P. (Eds.) (2002). Who should we help? The negative social consequences of merit scholarships. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
72. Henry, G.T., & Rubenstein, R. (2002). Paying for grades: Impacts of merit-based financial aid on educational quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21 (1): 93-109.
73. Henry, G.T., Rubenstein, R., & Bugler, D.T. (2004). Is HOPE enough? Impacts of receiving and losing merit-based financial aid. Educational Policy, 18 (5): 686-709.
74. Holmes, D.E. (Ed.) (2001). West Virginia Blue Book. (Vol. 83). Charleston, WV:Chapman Printing.
75. Hunter, J.F. (2002, November 2). Gambling on pulpit power. Knoxville News-Sentinel. pp. C1.
76. Hurtado, S., & Cade, H.W. (2001). Time for retreat or renewal? Perspectives on the effects of Hopwood on campus. In D.E. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, Access, and Accountability. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
77. Jenkins-Smith, H.C., & St. Clair, G.K. (1993). The politics of offshore energy:Empirically testing the advocacy coalition framework. In P. A. Sabatier and H.C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
78. Jones, C.O. (1984). An introduction to the study of public policy. (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
79. Kabler, P. (2001, April 14). Conferees nearer to gray bill compromise. Charleston Gazette. P1A.
80. King, J.E. (2003). 2003 Status report on the Pell Grant program. Washington, DC:American Council on Education.
81. King, G., Keohane, R.O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
82. Kingdon, J.W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
83. Leschine, T., Lind, K., & Sharma, R. (1999). Beliefs, values, and technical assessments in environmental management: Contaminated sediments in Puget Sound. In P.A. Sabatier (Ed.). An advocacy coalition lens on environmental policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
84. Leslie, D., & Novak, R. (2003). Substance vs. Politics: Through the Dark Mirror of Governance Reform. Educational Policy, 17 (1): 98-120.
85. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
86. Lindbolm, C. (1959). The science of 'muddling through.' Public Administration Review, 19: 79-88.
87. Lindbolm, C. (1968). The policymaking process. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
88. Locker, R. (2003, March 13). Bredesen seeks delay in scholarships, wants to see first-year lottery proceeds. Memphis Commercial Appeal.
89. Lowi, T. (1964) American business, public policy, case studies and political theory. World Politics, 16 (3): 677-715.
90. Lyons, W., Scheb, J.M., & Stair, B. (2001). Government and politics in Tennessee. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.
91. Marshall, C., Mitchell, D., & Wirt, F. (1989). Culture and education policy in the American states. New York: Falmer Press.
92. Martinez, M.C. (2002a). New Mexico Case Report: The state role in a climate of autonomy. New York: The Alliance for International Higher Education Policy Studies.
93. Martinez, M.C. (2002b). Understanding state higher education systems: Applying a new framework. Journal of Higher Education, 73 (3): 349-374.
94. Mawhinney, H. (1993). An advocacy coalition approach to change in Canadian education. In P. A. Sabatier and H.C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
95. Mayhew, D.R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
96. Mayhew, D.R. (2004). Congress: The electoral connection. (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
97. Mazzoni, T.L. (1993). The changing politics of state education policy making: A 20-year Minnesota perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15 (4): 357-379.
98. McCubbins, M.D., & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional oversight overlooked:Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28 (1): 165-179.
99. McGowan, R. (1994). State lotteries and legalized gambling: Painless revenue or painful mirage. Westport, CT: Praeger.
100. McLendon, M.K. (2000). Setting the agenda for state decentralization of higher education: Testing the explanatory boundaries of alternative agenda models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: University of Michigan.
101. McLendon, M.K. (2003a). Setting the governmental agenda for state decentralization of higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 74 (5): 479-515.
102. McLendon, M.K. (2003b). The politics of higher education: Toward an expanded research agenda. Educational Policy, 17 (1): 165-192.
103. McLendon, M.K., Hearn, J.C., & Deaton, R. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28 (1): 1-24.
104. McLendon, M.K., Heller, D.E., & Young, S.P (2005). State postsecondary policy innovation: Politics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. Journal of Higher Education, 76 (4): 363-400.
105. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Analyzing qualitative data. (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
106. Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41 (3): 738-770.
107. Mintrom, M. (2000). Policy entrepreneurs and school choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
108. Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1996). Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 24 (3): 420-434.
109. Mooney, C.Z., & Lee, M.H. (1999). Morality policy reinvention: State death penalties. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 566: 80-92.
110. Mortenson, T.G. (1998). The paradox of higher education opportunity in New Mexico. Oskaloosa, IA: Postsecondary Education OPPORTUNITY.
111. Munro, J.F. (1993). California water politics: Explaining policy change in cognitively polarized systems. In P. A. Sabatier and H.C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
112. National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs (NASSGAP). (1994). 25th Annual survey report 1993-1994 academic year. Washington, DC: NASSGAP.
113. National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs (NASSGAP). (2002). 32nd Annual survey report 2000-2001 academic year. Washington, DC: NASSGAP.
114. National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs (NASSGAP). (2004). 34th Annual survey report 2002-03 academic year. Washington, DC: NASSGAP.
115. Ness, E.C., & Noland, B.E. (2007). Targeted merit aid: Implications of the Tennessee Education Lottery Scholarship program. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 37 (1): 7-17.
116. Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2005). Bureaucratic competition in the policy process. Policy Studies Journal, 33 (3): 341-361.
117. Office of the Secretary of State. (1995). New Mexico Blue Book 1995-1996. Santa Fe, NM: Sunstone Press.
118. Peterson, K. (1994, December 22). Court considers gaming challenge. Santa Fe New Mexican, B1.
119. Polsby, N. (1984). Policy innovation in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
120. Proposed rules for the Promise scholarship program. (2001, April 2). Associated Press.
121. Pusser, B. (2004). Burning down the house: Politics, governance, and affirmative action at the University of California. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
122. Pusser, B. (2003). Beyond Baldridge: Extending the political model of higher education organization and governance. Educational Policy, 17 (1): 121-140.
123. Pusser, B. The contemporary politics of access policy: California after Proposition 209. In D.E. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy:Affordability, Access, and Accountability. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
124. Riker, W.H. (1986). The art of political manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
125. Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I.S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
126. Sabatier, P.A. (1999). The need for better theories. In P. A. Sabatier, (Ed.). Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
127. Sabatier, P.A., & Brasher, A.M. (1993). From vague consensus to clearly differentiated coalitions: Environmental policy at Lake Tahoe. In P. A. Sabatier and H.C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
128. Sabatier, P.A., & Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
129. Sabatier, P.A., & Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. A. Sabatier, (Ed.)5. Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
130. Seiler, F. (2001, April 5). West Virginia's Governor's scholarship program given a new life in legislature. Charleston Gazette.
131. Schattschneider, E.E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson.
132. Simon, H. (1957). Administrative behavior. (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
133. Smith, C. (2001, March 1). Support high for Promise scholarships: Poll respondents feel it's OK to use gambling funds. Charleston Daily Mail, P1A.
134. Spring, J. (1998). Conflict of interests: The politics of American education. (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
135. Squire, P. (2000). Uncontested seats in state legislative elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25: 131-146.
136. St. John, E.P., & Paulson, M.B. (2001). The finance of higher education: Implications for theory, research, policy, and practice. In M.B. Paulson and J.B. Smart (Eds.), The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, and practice. New York: Agathon Press.
137. State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO). (2006). State higher education finance FY 2005. Boulder, CO: SHEEO.
138. Tennessee Higher Education Commission (THEC). (2002a). Profiles and Trends in Higher Education. Nashville, TN: THEC.
139. Tennessee Higher Education Commission (THEC). (2002b). A Plan of Action for Tennessee Higher Education: A Revision of the 2000-05 Master Plan. Nashville, TN: THEC.
140. Tennessee Independent College and Universities Association (TICUA). (2003). Characteristics 2002. Nashville, TN: TICUA.
141. Trow, M. (1998). Governance in the University of California: The transformation of politics over administration. Higher Education Policy, 11 (1): 201-215.
142. University of New Mexico Institute of Public Policy. (1995). Quarterly Profile of New Mexico Citizens. UNM Institute of Public Policy Survey Research Center Report, 7 (4).
143. Wade, P. (2002, November 24). Naifeh renominated as House Speaker. Memphis Commercial Appeal. B1.
144. Wade, P. (2002, August 3). Hillary, Bredesen launch campaign roadshows. Memphis Commercial Appeal. A1.
145. Wade, P. (2002, February 8). Sundquist poses tax on income of 3.25%. Memphis Commercial Appeal. A1.
146. Wade, P. (2001, May 7). Promise board will establish new standards. Charleston Daily Mail. P1A.
147. Wade, P. (2001, May 2). Governor kicks off scholarship program. Charleston Daily Mail. P1C.
148. Walker, J.L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63 (3): 880-899.
149. Weible, C.M., & Sabateir, P.A. (2005). Comparing policy networks: Marine protected areas in California. Policy Studies Journal, 33 (2): 181-201.
150. Weiss, C.H. (1983). Ideology, interests, and information: The basis of policy positions. In Callahan and Jennings (Eds.), Ethics, the social sciences, and policy analysis. New York: Plenum Press.
151. Western Interstate Commission on Higher Education (WICHE). (2003). Policies in sync: Appropriations, Tuition, and Financial Aid for Higher Education. Boulder, CO: WICHE.
152. West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission (WVHEPC). (2001). Undergraduate student financial aid in West Virginia. Charleston, WV: WVHEPC.
153. Wirt, F.M., & Kirst, M.W. (1997). The political dynamics of American education. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
154. Wright, J.R. (2003). Interest groups and Congress. New York: Longman Classics in Political Science, Pearson Education, Inc.
155. Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
156. Youngman, S. (2003, March 28). Bredesen, sponsors meet to hash out particulars of lottery bill. Memphis Commercial Appeal. A14.
157. Zafonte, M., & Sabateir, P.A. (2004). Short-term versus long-term coalitions in the policy process: Automotive control, 1963-1989. Policy Studies Journal, 32 (1): 75-107.
158. Zahariadis, N. (1998). Comparing three lenses of policy choice. Policy Studies Journal, 26 (3): 434-448.
159. Zahariadis, N. (1999). Ambiguity, time, and multiple streams. In P. A. Sabatier, (Ed.). Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
160. Zahariadis, N. (2003). Ambiguity and choice in public policy: Political decision making in modern democracies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.