Processing instruction in French: The roles of explicit information and structured input

Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 191-209

  Wong, Wynne ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917112521     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610195     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R.Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language acquisition (pp. 259-302). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
2. Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
3. de Graaff, R. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 24-276.
4. DeKeyser, R., Salaberry, R., Robinson, P., & Harrington, M. (2002). What gets processed in processing instruction? A commentary on Bill VanPatten's "Update." Language Learning, 52, 805-823.
5. Doughty, C, (2002, March). Effects of instruction on second language acquisition. Paper presented at the Conference on Form-Meaning Connections in SLA, Chicago, IL
6. Ellis, N. (1993). Rules and instances in foreign language learning: Interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 289-318.
7. Ellis, N. (2002, March). The processes of second language acquisition. Paper presented at the Conference on Form-Meaning Connections in SLA, Chicago, IL.
8. Herman, R.L., & Olsen Flannigan, B. (1995). Adding grammar in a communicative based ESL program for children: Theory in practice. TESL Canada Journal 13, 1-16.
9. Lee, J., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw Hill.
10. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
11. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27-67.
12. Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M. O. (1999). Explicitness, intake and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511-556.
13. Scott, V. M. (1989). An empirical study of explicit and implicit teaching strategies in French. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 14-22.
14. Scott, V. M. (1990). Explicit and implicit grammar teaching strategies: New empirical data. French Review, 63, 779-789.
15. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.
16. VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation vs. structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495-510.
17. VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F.Eckman, D.Highland, P.Lee, J.Mileham & R.Rutkowski Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy) pp. 169-185). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.