Materiality of works: The bibliographic record as text

Works as Entities for Information Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 39-66

  Andersen, Jack ^a  

^a ROYAL SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Bibliographic record; Information retrieval; Knowledge organization; Paratext

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917022663     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203049624     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Andersen, J. 2000. Written knowledge: A literary perspective on indexing theory. Knowledge organization 27: 201-212.
2. Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge. The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Bizzell, P. 1982. Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. PRE/TEXT. An inter-disciplinary journal of rhetoric, 3: 213-243.
4. Bolter, J. David. 2001. Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. 2nd ed. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
5. Borgman, C.L. 1996. Why are online catalogs still hard to use? Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47: 493-503.
6. Burke, Peter. 2000. A social history of knowledge. From Gutenberg to Diderot. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7. Dahlström M. & Gunnarson, M. 2000. DA draws a circle: On document architecture and its relation to lis education and research. Information research 5: 2 (http://informationr.net/ir/5-2/paper70.html).
8. Foucault, M. 1980. What Is an Author? In Textual strategies. Perspectives in post-structuralist criticism, ed. Josué V. Harari. London: Methuen, pp. 141-60.
9. Garfield, Eugene. 1979.Citation indexing: its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Genette, Gerard. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of interpretation, trans. Jane E. Lewin; foreword Richard Macksey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Gracia, Jorge J. E. 1995. A theory oftextuality: The logic and epistemology. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
12. Hjørland, Birger. 1997. Information seeking and subject representation: An activity-theoretical approach to information science. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
13. Hjørland, B. 1998. Information retrieval, text composition and semantics. Knowledge Organization 25: 16-31.
14. Hjørland, B. & Kyllesbech Nielsen, L. 2001. Subject access points in electronic retrieval. Annual review of information science and technology 35: 249-98.
15. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. 1998. Functional requirements for bibliographic records: Final report. München: K. G. Saur (http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf).
16. McGann, Jerome John. 1991. The textual condition. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press.
17. McKenzie, Donald Francis. 1986. Bibliography and the sociology of texts. The Panizzi lectures; 1985. London: British Library.
18. Miksa, Francis L. 1998. The DDC, the Universe of Knowledge, and the Post-Modern Library. Albany, N.Y.: Forest Press.
19. Miller, C. R. 1994. Genre as Social Action. In: Aviva Freedman & Peter Medway, eds. Genre and the new rhetoric. Critical perspectives on education. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 23-42. (Originally published in Quarterly journal of speech 70 (1984): 151-67).
20. Poster, M. 2001. Print and digital authorship. Papers from the Centre of Internet Research, Aarhus, Denmark. (http://www.imv.au.dk/cfi/pub/skriftserie/001_poster.pdf).
21. Rose, Mark. 1993. Authors and owners: The invention of copyright. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
22. Shillingsburg, L. 1991. Text as concept, matter, and action. Studies in bibliography 44: 31-83.
23. Wilson, Patrick. 1968. Two kinds of power: An essay on bibliographical control. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24. Wilson, Patrick. 1983. Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
25. Woodmansee, Martha. 1994. On the author effect: Recovering collectivity. In The construction of authorship: Textual appropriation in law and literature, ed. Martha Woodmansee and Peter Jaszi. Durham: Duke University Press.