Written knowledge: A literary perspective on indexing theory

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 201-212

  Andersen, Jack ^a  

^a ROYAL SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034340606     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Andersen, J. & Christensen, F. S. (1999). Wittgenstein and indexing theory. Proceedings of the 10th ASIS SIG/CR. Classification Research Workshop. Washington D.C. October 31. Ed. Hanne Albrechtsen & Jens-Erik Mai. (IN PRESS)
2. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
3. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge. The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. The University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Bazerman, C. & Paradis, J. (ed.).(1991). Textual Dynamics of the Professions. Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities. The University of Wisconsin Press.
5. Blair, D. C. (1990). Language and representation in information retrieval. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. Buckland, M. K. (1999). The Landscape of Information Science: The American Society for Information Science at 62. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(11). 970-974.
7. Budd, J. (1995). An epistemological foundation for library and information science. Library Quarterly, 65(3). 295-358.
8. Campbell, G. (2000). Aboutness and Meaning: How a Paradigm of Subject Analysis Can Illuminate Queer Theory in Literary Studies. In: Dimensions of a Global Information Science. Edited by Angela Kublik. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science. (http://www.slis.ualberta.ca/cais2000/ campbell.htm)
9. Cornelius, I. (1996). Meaning and method in information studies. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey.
10. Dick, A. (1999). Epistemological positions and library and information science. Library Quarterly, 69(3). 305-323.
11. Duguid, P. (1996). Material matters: The past and futurology of the book. In: Geoffrey Nunberg (Ed.). The Future of the Book. Berkeley: University of California Press. 63-101.
12. Egan, M. & Shera, J. H. (1952). Foundations of a theory of bibliography. Library Quarterly. 22(2). 125-137.
13. Ellis D. (1996). Progress and problems in information retrieval. London: Library Association Publishing.
14. Fairthorne, R. A. (1969). Content analysis, specification and control. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 4. 73-109.
15. Hjerppe, R. (1994). A framework for the description of generalized documents, pp. 173-180. In: Knowledge Organization and Quality Management: Proceedings of the third ISKO conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed. By Hanne Albrechtsen and Susanne Ørnager. INDERS: Frankfurt/Main.
16. Hjørland, B. (1992) The Concept of "Subject" in Information Science. Journal of Documentation. 48(2). 172-200.
17. Hjørland, B. (1997). Subject representation and information seeking. An activity-theoretical approach to information science. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press.
18. Hjørland, B. (1998a). Information retrieval, text composition and semantics. Knowledge Organization, 25(1/2). 16-31.
19. Hjørland, B. (1998b). Theory and metatheory of information science: A new interpretation. Journal of Documentation, 54(5). 606-621.
20. Hjørland, B. (2000). Documents, memory institutions and information science. Journal of Documentation, 56(1). 27-41.
21. Houser, L. (1986a). Documents: The domain of library and information science. Library and Information Science Research, 8. 163-188.
22. Houser, L. (1986b). The classification of science literatures by their "hardness". Library and Information Science Research, 8. 357-372.
23. Hutchins, J. W. (1978): The concept of "aboutness" in subject indexing. Aslib Proceedings, 30. 172-181.
24. Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, 52(1). 3-50.
25. ISO. (1986). Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri. International Organization for Standardization.
26. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y. (1998). Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities. The Flow of Ideas Within and Among Disciplines. Greenwood Press: Westport, Connecticut & London.
27. Mai, J. E. (2000). The subject indexing process: an investigation of problems in knowledge representation. Graduate School of Library and Information Science, The University of Texas at Austin. (Unpubl. PhD.-dissertation)
28. Mangen, A. (1999). Fra dokumentkompleks til bok til verk til tekst. Noen refleksioner omkring forholdet mellom dokumentasjonsvitenskap og litteraturvitenskab. Norsk Tidsskrift for Biblioteksforskning, 12. 48-65.
29. Swift, D. F., Winn, V. A. & Bramer, D. A. (1977). A Multi-Modal Approach to Indexing and Classification. International Classification, 4(2). 90-94.
30. Wilson, P. (1968). Two kinds of power. An essay on bibliographical control. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
32. Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuiness. London: Routledge & Paul.
33. Woodward, A. M. (1977). The roles of reviews in information transfer. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 28(3). 175-180.