Confirmatory factor analysis of the moral foundations questionnaire independent scale validation in a new zealand sample

Social Psychology

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 431-436

  Davies, Caitlin L ^a   Sibley, Chris G ^b   Liu, James H ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Confirmatory factor analysis; Moral foundations; New Zealand; Scale validation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84916938222     PISSN: 18649335     EISSN: 21512590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000201     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Abramowitz, A., & Saunders, K. (2005). Why can't we all just get along? The reality of a polarized America. The Forum, 3, 1-22. doi: 10.2202/1540-8884.1076
2. Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral Foundations Theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55-130.
3. Graham, J. , Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046. doi: 10.1037/a0015141
4. Graham , J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385. doi: 10.1037/a0021847
5. Greav es, L. M., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2014). Profiling the fence-sitters in New Zealand elections: A latent class model of political voting blocs. Unpublished manuscript.
6. Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116. doi: 10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z
7. Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133, 55-66. doi: 10.1162/0011526042365555
8. Hu L.,Bentler P. M., 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit inde xes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55,doi10.1080/10705519909540118.
9. Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define America. New York, NY: Basic Books.
10. Kenny, D. A. (2014). Measuring Model Fit. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm
11. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitivedevelopmental a pproach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347-480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
12. Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Ditto, P., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J. ( 2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 184-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp. 2012.01.006
13. Lipson, L. (2011). The politics of equality: New Zealand's adventures in democracy. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University Press.
14. Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The big three' of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the big three' explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119-169). New York, NY: Routledge.
15. Steiger, J. H. (2007 ). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893-898. doi: 10.1016/j.paid. 2006.09.017
16. Wilson, M. S. (1999). The s ocial representational theory of symbolic politics. (Doctoral dissertation). Victoria University Research Archive. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10063/815