An Ecological Approach to Privacy: “Doing” Online Privacy at Midlife

Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 562-580

  Quinn, Kelly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84916888395     PISSN: 08838151     EISSN: 15506878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08838151.2014.966357     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In G. Danezis & P. Golle (Eds.), Privacy enhancing technologies (pp. 36–58). Cambridge, UK: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/11957454_3
2. Ahern, S., Eckles, D., Good, N. S., King, S., Naaman, M., & Nair, R. (2007). Over-exposed? Privacy patterns and considerations in online and mobile photo sharing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems-CHI'07 (p. 357). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1240624.1240683
3. Allen, A. (1988). Uneasy access: Privacy for women in a free society. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
4. Altheide, D. L. (1995). An ecology of communication: Cultural formats of control. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
5. Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
6. Atchley, R. C. (1988). Social forces and aging: An introduction to social gerontology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
7. Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11, 1–12. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1394/1312
8. Bennett, J. W. (1993). Human ecology as human behavior: Essays in environmental and development anthropology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
9. boyd, d. (2008). Facebook's privacy trainwreck: Exposure, invasion, and social convergence. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14, 1–0. doi:10.1177/1354856507084416
10. boyd, d., & Marwick, A. (2011a May). Social steganography: Privacy in networked publics. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Conference, Boston, MA. Retrieved from http://www.danah.org
11. boyd, d., & Marwick, A. (2011b September). Social privacy in networked publics: Teens' attitudes, practices, and strategies. Paper presented at A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, Oxford, UK. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1925128
12. Boyd, R., Silk, J. B., Irons, W., Mealey, L., & Mace, R. (2003). Human sociobiology and behavior. In M. Pagel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. .
13. Buchanan, T., Paine, C., & Joinson, A. N. (2007). Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the Internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 58, 15–65. doi:10.1002/asi
14. Carney, J. K., & Cohler, B. J. (1993). Developmental continuities and adjustment in adulthood: Social relations, morale, and the transformation from middle to late life. In S. I. Greenspan & G. H. Pollock (Eds.), The course of life: Late adulthood, vol. 6, rev. ed. (pp. 19–26). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
15. Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A.-K., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 8–08. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01494.x
16. Dittmann-Kohli, F. (2005). Middle age and identity in a cultural and lifespan perspective. In S. L. Willis & M. Martin (Eds.), Middle adulthood: A lifespan perspective (pp. 31–53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Dörner, J., Mickler, C., & Staudinger, U. M. (2005). Self-development at midlife. In S. L. Willis & M. Martin (Eds.), Middle adulthood: A lifespan perspective (pp. 27–17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Fogel, J., & Nehmad, E. (2009). Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 15–60. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.006
19. Foth, M., & Hearn, G. (2007). Networked individualism of urban residents: Discovering the communicative ecology in inner-city apartment buildings. Information, Communication & Society, 10, 749–772. doi:10.1080/13691180701658095
20. Gibbs, G. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. London, UK: Sage.
21. Hawley, A. H. (1950). Human ecology: A theory of community structure. New York, NY: Ronald Press Co.
22. Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (2002). The Internet in everyday life: An introduction. In C. Haythornthwaite & B. Wellman (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 3–4). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23. Hinduja, S., & Patchin J. W. (2008). Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 125–146.
24. Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, 377–386. doi:10.1177/0270467610385893
25. Hunt, S. (2005). The challenge of mid-life. In The life course: A sociological introduction, pp. 16–83. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
26. Krebs, J. R., & Davies, N. B. (1993). An introduction to behavioral ecology, 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
27. Lachman, M. E. (2004). Development in midlife. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 305–31. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141521
28. Lampinen, A., Tamminen, S., & Oulasvirta, A. (2009). All my people right here, right now. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work-GROUP'09 (p. 281). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1531674.1531717
29. Madden, M. (2012). Privacy management on social media sites. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available at http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Privacy-management-on-social-media.aspx
30. Margulis, S. T. (2003). On the status and contribution of Westin's and Altman's theories of privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 411–429. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00071
31. Margulis, S. T. (2011). Three theories of privacy: An overview. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social Web (pp. 9–17). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6
32. Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13, 11–33. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
33. McLaughlin, C., & Vitak, J. (2012). Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14, 299–315. doi:10.1177/1461444811412712
34. Milne, G. R., & Culnan, M. J. (2004). Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don't read) online privacy notices. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18, 1–9. doi:10.1002/dir.20009
35. Moos, R. H. (1976). The human context: Environmental determinants of behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley.
36. Neugarten, B. L. (1971). Grow older with me. The best is yet to be. Psychology Today, 5, 4–8.
37. Nippert-Eng, C. (2010). Islands of privacy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38. Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy and the integrity of social life. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.
39. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 3rd ed. London, UK: Sage.
40. Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
41. Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2009). September 2009—Reputation management [data file, questionnaire and code book]. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Data-Tools/Download-Data/Data-Sets.aspx
42. Reynolds, B., Venkatanathan, J., Gonçalves, J., & Kostakos, V. (2011). Sharing ephemeral information in online social networks: Privacy perceptions and behaviors. In Human-Computer interaction–INTERACT 2011 (pp. 20–15). Heidelberg: Springer Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23765-2_14
43. Samuelson, P. (1990). Digital media and the changing face of intellectual property law. Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal, 16, 32–40.
44. Solove, D. J. (2008). Understanding privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Staddon, J., Acquisti, A., & LeFevre, K. (2013). Self-reported social network behavior: Accuracy predictors and implications for the privacy paradox. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Social Computing (pp. 295–302). Washington, DC: IEEE. doi:10.1109/SocialCom.2013.48.
46. Strater, K., & Lipford, H. R. (2008). Strategies and struggles with privacy in an online social networking community. In D. England (Ed.), BCS-HCI '08 Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction–Volume 1 (pp. 11–19). Swinton, UK: British Computer Society.
47. Stutzman, F., Capra, R., & Thompson, J. (2011). Factors mediating disclosure in social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 59–98. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.017
48. Stutzman, F., & Hartzog, W. (2012). Boundary regulation in social media. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work-CSCW'12 (p. 769). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2145204.2145320
49. Stutzman, F., & Kramer-Duffield, J. (2010). Friends only: Examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in Facebook. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems-CHI'10 (p. 1553). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753559
50. Taddicken, M. (2014). The ‘privacy paradox’ in the social Web: The impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on different forms of self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 24–73. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12052
51. Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28, 2–6. doi:10.1177/0270467607311484
52. Vitak, J. (2012). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 451–470. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.732140
53. Vitak, J., & Ellison, N. B. (2013). “There's a network out there you might as well tap”: Exploring the benefits of and barriers to exchanging informational and support-based resources on Facebook. New Media & Society, 5, 243–259. doi:10.1177/1461444812451566
54. Vitak, J., Lampe, C., Gray, R., & Ellison, N. B. (2012). Why won't you be my Facebook friend? In Proceedings of the 2012 iConference (pp. 555–557). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2132176.2132286
55. Wells, J., & Lewis, L. (2006). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994–2005 (NCES 2007-020). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from National Center for Education Statistics Web site: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007020
56. Westin, A. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York, NY: Athenaeum.
57. Willis, S. L., & Schaie, K. W. (1999). Intellectual functioning in midlife. In S. L. Willis & J. D. Reid (Eds.), Life in the middle: Psychological and social development in middle age (pp. 234–247). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
58. Young, A. L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2009). Information revelation and internet privacy concerns on social network sites. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on communities and technologies-C&T'09 (p. 265). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1556460.1556499
59. Zafeiropoulou, A. M., Millard, D. E., Webber, C., & O'Hara, K. (2013). Unpicking the privacy paradox. In Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM Web science conference–WebSci ′13 (pp. 463–472). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2464464.2464503