Toward patient-centered care: A systematic review of how to ask questions that matter to patients

Medicine (United States)

Volumn 93, Issue 22, 2014, Pages

  Rosenzveig, Alicia ^a   Kuspinar, Ayse ^a   Daskalopoulou, Stella S ^c   Mayo, Nancy E ^a,b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CINAHL; CLASSIFIER; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DEPRESSION; FATIGUE; HEALTH STATUS; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; PAIN; PAIN SEVERITY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE; PERCEPTION; PROFILE OF MOOD STATES; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SELF REPORT; SHORT FORM 12; SLEEP QUALITY; STRESS; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; PSYCHOMETRY;

HUMANS; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84916640836     PISSN: 00257974     EISSN: 15365964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000120     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. Washington, DC: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; 2013.
2. Greenhalgh J, Meadows K. The effectiveness of the use of patientbased measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999;5:401-416.
3. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4:293-307.
4. Velikova G, Wright P. Individual patient monitoring. Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005:291-306.
5. Bennett AV, Jensen RE, Basch E. Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:337-347.
6. Snyder CF, Herman JM, White SM,et al. When using patientreported outcomes in clinical practice, the measure matters: a randomized controlled trial. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10:e299-e306.
7. Rose M, Bezjak A. Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:125-136.
8. Paterson C. Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey. BMJ. 1996;312:1016-1020.
9. Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R. The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:833-843.
10. Higginson IJ, Carr AJ. Measuring quality of life: using quality of life measures in the clinical setting. BMJ. 2001;322:1297-1300.
11. Joyce CRB, McGee HM, O'Boyle CA. Individual Quality of Life: Approaches to Conceptualisation and Assessment. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Taylor & Francis; 1999.
12. Fayers P, Hays R. Evaluating mult-item scales. Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
13. Greenhalgh J. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? Qual Life Res. 2009;18:115-123.
14. Chlan LL. Relationship between two anxiety instruments in patients receiving mechanical ventilatory support. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48:493-499.
15. DeSalvo KB, Fisher WP, Tran K, et al. Assessing measurement properties of two single-item general health measures. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:191-201.
16. McKinley S, Stein-Parbury J, Chehelnabi A, et al. Assessment of anxiety in intensive care patients by using the Faces Anxiety Scale. Am J Crit Care. 2004;13:146-152.
17. McKinley S, Madronio C. Validity of the Faces Anxiety Scale for the assessment of state anxiety in intensive care patients not receiving mechanical ventilation. J Psychosom Res. 2008;64:503-507.
18. Bowling A. Just one question: if one question works, why ask several? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:342-345.
19. McKinley S, Coote K, Stein-Parbury J. Development and testing of a Faces Scale for the assessment of anxiety in critically ill patients. J Adv Nurs. 2003;41:73-79.
20. Surti B, Spiegel B, Ippoliti A, et al. Assessing health status in inflammatory bowel disease using a novel single-item numeric rating scale. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:1313-1321.
21. United States Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry on patient-reported outcome measures-use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Federal Registry. 2009;74:65132-65133.
22. Chalut DS, Ducharme FM, Davis GM. The Preschool Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM): a responsive index of acute asthma severity. J Pediatr. 2000;137:762-768.
23. Mattis S. Dementia Rating Scale. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1988.
24. Cameron JI, Cheung AM, Streiner DL, et al. Factor structure and reliability of the brain impairment behavior scale. J Neurosci Nurs. 2008;40:40-47.
25. Bogousslavsky J. William Feinberg lecture 2002: emotions, mood, and behavior after stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:1046-1050.
26. Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ, et al. The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J. 1985;132:919-923.
27. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel lndex. Md St Med J. 1965;14:61-65.
28. Cella DF, Perry SW. Reliability and concurrent validity of three visual-analogue mood scales. Psychol Rep. 1986;59:827-833.
29. Revicki DA, Kawata AK, Harnam N, et al. Predicting EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items and domain item banks in a United States sample. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:783-791.
30. Mayo NE, Hum S, Kuspinar A. Methods and measures: what's new for MS? Mult Scler. 2013;19:709-713.
31. Brink Y, Louw QA. Clinical instruments: reliability and validity critical appraisal. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18:1126-1132.
32. Bulli F, Miccinesi G, Maruelli A, et al. The measure of psychological distress in cancer patients: the use of Distress Thermometer in the Oncological Rehabilitation Center of Florence. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17:771-779.
33. Goebel S, Mehdorn HM. Measurement of psychological distress in patients with intracranial tumours: the NCCN distress thermometer. J Neurooncol. 2011;104:357-364.
34. Gunnarsdottir S, Thorvaldsdottir GH, Fridriksdottir N, et al. The psychometric properties of the Icelandic version of the distress thermometer and problem list. Psychooncology. 2012;21:730-736.
35. Hegel MT, Collins ED, Kearing S, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the Distress Thermometer for depression in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2008;17:556-560.
36. Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Trask PC, et al. Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer. 2005;103:1494-1502.
37. Keir ST, Calhoun-Eagan RD, Swartz JJ, et al. Screening for distress in patients with brain cancer using the NCCN's rapid screening measure. Psychooncology. 2008;17:621-625.
38. Thekkumpurath P, Venkateswaran C, Kumar M, et al. Screening for psychological distress in palliative care: performance of touch screen questionnaires compared with semistructured psychiatric interview. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38:597-605.
39. Akechi T, Okuyama T, Sugawara Y, et al. Screening for depression in terminally ill cancer patients in Japan. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006;31:5-12.
40. Chochinov HM, Wilson KG, Enns M, et al. "Are you depressed?" Screening for depression in the terminally ill. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:674-676.
41. Kawase E, Karasawa K, Shimotsu S, et al. Evaluation of a onequestion interview for depression in a radiation oncology department in Japan. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28:321-322.
42. Ayalon L, Goldfracht M, Bech P. 'Do you think you suffer from depression?' Reevaluating the use of a single item question for the screening of depression in older primary care patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25:497-502.
43. Jesse DE, Graham M. Are you often sad and depressed? Brief measures to identify women at risk for depression in pregnancy. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2005;30:40-45.
44. Watkins CL, Lightbody CE, Sutton CJ, et al. Evaluation of a singleitem screening tool for depression after stroke: a cohort study. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:846-852.
45. De Jong MM, An K, McKinley S, et al. Using a 0-10 scale for assessment of anxiety in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2005;24:139-146.
46. Elliot D. Comparison of three instruments for measuring patient anxiety in a coronary care unit. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 1993;9:195-200.
47. Schwartz AL, Meek PM, Nail LM, et al. Measurement of fatigue: determining minimally important clinical differences. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:239-244.
48. van Hooff ML, Geurts SA, Kompier MA, et al. "How fatigued do you currently feel?" Convergent and discriminant validity of a single-item fatigue measure. J Occup Health. 2007;49:224-234.
49. ten Klooster PM, Vlaar AP, Taal E, et al. The validity and reliability of the graphic rating scale and verbal rating scale for measuring pain across cultures: a study in Egyptian and Dutch women with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin J Pain. 2006;22:827-830.
50. Rohrer JE, Herman DC, Merry SP, et al. Validity of overall selfrated health as an outcome measure in small samples: a pilot study involving a case series. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15:366-369.
51. Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, McDermott AM, et al. Psychometric properties of a single-item scale to assess sleep quality among individuals with fibromyalgia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:54.
52. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Gibbons E, et al. Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:82.
53. de Vet H, Terwee C, Mokkink L, et al. Measurement in Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
54. Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford P, et al. Physical Rehabilitation Outcome Measures: A Guide to Enhanced Clinical Decision Making. 2nd ed. Toronto, ON: Canadian Physiotherapy Association; 2002.
55. Feldt L, Brennan R. Reliability. In: Linn R, ed. Educational Measurement. Pheonix: Oryx Press; 1993;105-146.
56. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:155-159.
57. Schneeweiss S, Seeger JD, Maclure M, et al. Performance of comorbidity scores to control for confounding in epidemiologic studies using claims data. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154:854-864.
58. Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977;33:363-374.
59. Ware Jr. JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey. Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-233.
60. Freyd M. The Graphic Rating Scale. J Educ Psychol. 1923;14: 83-102.
61. Hayes M, Patterson D. Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychol Bull. 1921;18:98-113.
62. Unden AL, Andreasson A, Elofsson S, et al. Inflammatory cytokines, behaviour and age as determinants of self-rated health in women. Clin Sci (Lond). 2007;112:363-373.
63. Christian LM, Glaser R, Porter K, et al. Poorer self-rated health is associated with elevated inflammatory markers among older adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011;36:1495-1504.
64. Tanno K, Ohsawa M, Onoda T, et al. Poor self-rated health is significantly associated with elevated C-reactive protein levels in women, but not in men, in the Japanese general population. J Psychosom Res. 2012;73:225-231.
65. Jylha M, Volpato S, Guralnik JM. Self-rated health showed a graded association with frequently used biomarkers in a large population sample. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:465-471.
66. Kahn MW. Etiquette-based medicine. New Engl J Med. 2008;358:1988-1989.
67. Block L, Hutzler L, Habicht R, et al. Do internal medicine interns practice etiquette-based communication? A critical look at the inpatient encounter. J Hosp Med. 2013;8:631-634.
68. Fogarty LA, Curbow BA, Wingard JR, et al. Can 40 seconds of compassion reduce patient anxiety? J Clin Oncol. 1999;17: 371-379.
69. Griffith CH III, Wilson JF, Langer S, et al. House staff nonverbal communication skills and standardized patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:170-174.
70. Tackett S, Tad-y D, Rios R, et al. Appraising the practice of etiquette-based medicine in the inpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;7:908-913.
71. Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13:227-236.
72. Ahles TA, Ruckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB. Cancer-related pain-II. Assessment with visual analogue scales. J Psychosom Res. 1984;28:121-124.
73. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, et al. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978;37:378-381.
74. Seymour RA. The use of pain scales in assessing the efficacy of analgesics in post-operative dental pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;23:441-444.
75. Folstein MF, Luria R. Reliability, validity, and clinical application of the visual analogue mood scale. Psychol Med. 1973;3:479-486.
76. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, et al. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983;17:45-56.