When using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice, the measure matters: A randomized controlled trial

Journal of Oncology Practice

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2014, Pages e299-e306

  Snyder, Claire F ^a   Herman, Joseph M ^a   White, Sharon M ^a   Luber, Brandon S ^a   Blackford, Amanda L ^a   Carducci, Michael A ^a   Wu, Albert W ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ALGORITHM; BREAST NEOPLASMS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ONCOLOGY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROCEDURES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF REPORT; STANDARDS; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELF REPORT; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84911934207     PISSN: 15547477     EISSN: 1935469X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001413     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Greenhalgh J, Meadows K: The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: A literature review. J Eval Clin Pract 5:401-416, 1999
2. Marshall S, Haywood K, Fitzpatrick R: Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: A structured review. J Eval Clin Pract 12:559-568, 2006
3. Valderas JM, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M, et al: The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: A systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res 17:179-193, 2008
4. Haywood K, Marshall S, Fitzpatrick R: Patient participation in the consultation process: A structured review of intervention strategies. Patient Educ Couns 63:12-23, 2006
5. Greenhalgh J: The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Qual Life Res 18:115-123, 2009
6. Snyder CF, Wu AW, Miller RS, et al: The role of informatics in promoting patient-centered care. Cancer J 17:211-218, 2011
7. Acquadro C, Berzon R, Dubois D, et al: Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: An ad hoc task force report of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) harmonization group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration. Value Health 6:522-531, 2001
8. US Food and Drug Administration: Guidance for industry. Patient reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Fed Regist 74:65132-65133, 2009
9. Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, et al: Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 22:714-724, 2004
10. Berry DL, Blumenstein BA, Halpenny B, et al: Enhancing patient-provider communication with the electronic self-report assessment for cancer: A randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 29:1029-1035, 2011
11. Santana MJ, Feeny D, Johnson JA, et al: Assessing the use of health-related quality of life measures in the routine clinical care of lung-transplant patients. Qual Life Res 19:371-379, 2010
12. Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, et al: Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 288:3027-3034, 2002
13. Cleeland CS, Wang XS, Shi Q, et al: Automated symptom alerts reduce postoperative symptom severity after cancer surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 29:994-1000, 2011
14. McLachlan SA, Allenby A, Matthews J, et al: Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessments versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:4117-4125, 2001
15. Basch E, Abernethy AP: Supporting clinical practice decisions with real-time patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Oncol 28:954-956, 2011
16. Rose M, Bezjak A: Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: An overview and practical examples. Qual Life Res 18:125-136, 2009
17. Brundage M, Osoba D, Bezjak A, et al: Lessons learned in the assessment of health-related quality of life: Selected examples from the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25:5078-5081, 2007
18. Bottomley A, Aaronson NK, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer: International perspective on health-related quality-of-life research in cancer clinical trials: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer experience. J Clin Oncol 25:5082-5086, 2007
19. Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder C (eds): Outcomes Assessment in Cancer: Measures, Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005
20. MAPI Research Trust: Patient Reported Outcome and Quality of Life Instruments Database (PROQOLID). http://www.proqolid.org
21. Snyder CF, Dy SM, Hendricks DE, et al: Asking the right questions: Investigating needs assessments and health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in oncology clinical practice. Support Care Cancer 15:1075-1085, 2007
22. Snyder CF, Jensen RE, Geller G, et al: Relevant content for a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire for use in oncology clinical practice: Putting doctors and patients on the same page. Qual Life Res 19:1045-1055, 2010
23. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365-376, 1993
24. Velikova G, Brown JM, Smith AB, et al: Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor-patient interactions in oncology. Br J Cancer 86:51-59, 2002
25. Detmar SB, Aaronson NK: Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: A feasibility study. Eur J Cancer 34:1181-1886, 1998
26. Taenzer P, Bultz BD, Carlson LE, et al: Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behavior and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psycho-oncology 9:203-213, 2000
27. Bonevski B, Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, et al: Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:217-225, 2000
28. Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, et al: The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:226-237, 2000
29. PROMIS: Dynamic tools to measure health outcomes from the patient perspective. www.nihpromis.org
30. Snyder CF, Jensen R, Courtin SO, et al: PatientViewpoint: A website for patient-reported outcomes assessment. Qual Life Res 18:793-800, 2009
31. Snyder CF, Blackford AL, Wolff AC, et al: Feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint: A web system for patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice. Psycho-oncology 22:895-901, 2013
32. Basch E, Artz D, Dulko D, et al: Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:3552-3561, 2005
33. Basch E, Artz D, Iasonos A, et al: Evaluation of an online platform for cancer patient self-reporting of chemotherapy toxicities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14:264-268, 2007
34. Carlson LE, Speca M, Hagen N, Taenzer P: Computerized quality-of-life screening in a cancer pain clinic. J Palliat Care 17:46-52, 2001
35. Velikova G, Awad N, Coles-Gale R, et al: The clinical value of quality of life assessment in oncology practice-A qualitative study of patient and physician views. Psycho-oncology 17:690-698, 2008
36. Bjorner JB, Chang CH, Thissen D, Reeve BB: Developing tailored instruments: Item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Qual Life Res 16:95-108, 2007 (suppl 1)