A study on LIWC categories for opinion mining in Spanish reviews

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 749-760

  Del Pilar Salas Zárate, María ^a   López López, Estanislao ^a   Valencia García, Rafael ^a   Aussenac Gilles, Nathalie ^b   Almela, Ángela ^c   Alor Hernández, Giner ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^d INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE ORIZABA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Machine learning; Natural language processing with LIWC; Opinion mining; Sentiment analysis

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA MINING; DECISION MAKING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUE; COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT; EXPONENTIAL GROWTH; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NATURAL LANGUAGE TEXT; NATURAL LANGUAGES; OPINION MINING;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84916631148     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: 17416485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165551514547842     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. García-Crespo A, Colomo-Palacios R, Gómez-Berbís JM and Ruiz-Mezcua B. SEMO: A framework for customer social networks analysis based on semantics. Journal of Information Technology 2010; 25(2): 178-188.
2. Thet TT, Cheon J and Khoo C. Aspect-based sentiment analysis of movie reviews on discussion boards. Journal of Information Science 2010; 36: 823-848.
3. Bouckaert R, Frank E, Hall M, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P and Witten I. WEKA - Experiences with a Java Open- Source project. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2010; 11: 2533-2541.
4. Rushdi Saleh M, Martín Valdivia M, Montejo Ráez A and Ureña López L. Experiments with SVM to classify opinions in different domains. Expert Systems with Applications 2011; 38: 14799-14804.
5. Moraes R, Valiati J and Gavião Neto W. Document-level sentiment classification: An empirical comparison between SVM and ANN. Expert Systems with Applications 2013; 40: 621-633.
6. Xia R, Zong C and Li S. Ensemble of feature sets and classification algorithms for sentiment classification. Information Sciences 2011; 181: 1138-1152.
7. He Y and Zhou D. Self-training from labeled features for sentiment analysis. Information Processing and Management 2011; 47: 606-616.
8. Peñalver Martínez I, Valencia García R and García Sánchez F. Ontology-guided approach for Feature-Based Opinion Mining. In: 16th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, NLDB 2011, Alicante, Spain.
9. Basari SH, Hussin B, Ananta GP and Zeniarja J. Opinion mining of movie review using hybrid method of support vector machine and particle swarm optimization. Procedia Engineering 2013; 53: 453-462.
10. Montejo Ráez A, Martínez Cámara E, Martín Valdivia MT and Ureña López LA. Ranked WordNet graph for sentiment polarity classification in Twitter. Computer Speech and Language 2014; 28: 93-107.
11. Chen LS, Liu CH and Chiu HJ. A neural network based approach for sentiment classification in the blogosphere. Journal of Informetrics 2011, 5: 313-322.
12. Zhai Z, Xu H, Kang B and Jia P. Exploiting effective features for Chinese sentiment classification. Expert Systems with Applications 2011; 38: 9139-9146.
13. Xuo T, Peng Q and Cheng Y. Identifying the semantic orientation of terms using S-HAL for sentiment analysis. Knowledgebased Systems 2012; 35: 279-289.
14. Wu Q and Tan S. A two-stage framework for cross-domain sentiment classification. Expert Systems with Applications 2011; 38: 14269-14275.
15. Jian Z, Chen X and Han-Shi W. Sentiment classification using the theory of ANNs. The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications 2010; 17: 58-62.
16. Molina González M, Martínez Cámara E, Martín Valdivia M and Perea Ortega J. Semantic orientation for polarity classification in Spanish reviews. Expert Systems with Applications 2013; 40: 7250-7257.
17. Stiles WB. Describing Talk: A Taxonomy of Verbal Response Modes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992.
18. Pennebaker JW, Francis ME and Mayne TJ. Linguistic predictors of adaptive bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997; 72(4): 863-871.
19. Francis ME and Pennebaker JW. LIWC: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University, 1993.
20. Pennebaker JW, Francis ME and Booth RJ. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.
21. Ramírez Esparza N, Pennebaker JW, García FA and SuriáMartínez R. La psicología del uso de las palabras: un programa de computadora que analiza textos en español. Revista Mexicana de Psicología 2007; 24(1): 85-89.
22. Watson D, Clark L and Tellengen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988; 54(6): 1063-1070.
23. móviles.com. El comparador de telefonía líder en España, http://www.moviles.com/ (accessed 17 June 2014).
24. Cruz FM, Troyano JA, Enriquez F and Ortega J. Clasificación de documentos basada en la opinión: experimentos con un corpus de críticas de cine enespañol. Procesamiento del lenguaje natural 2008; (41): 73-80.
25. Gholap J. Performance tuning of J48 Algorithm for prediction of soil fertility. Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology 2012; 2(8).
26. Pearl J. Bayesian networks: A model of self-activated memory for evidential reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Irvine, CA, 1985, pp. 329-334.
27. Platt J. Sequential minimal optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines. Microsoft Research, 1998.
28. Keerti SS, Shevade SK, Battacharyya C and Murthy K. Improvements to Platt's SMO algorithm for SVM classifier design. Neural Computation 2001; 13(3): 637-649.
29. Nahar J, Tickle K, Ali S and Chen P. Computational intelligence for microarray data and biomedical image analysis for the early diagnosis of breast cancer. Expert Systems with Applications 2012; 39: 12371-12377.
30. Chen L, Qi L and Wang F. Comparison of feature-level learning methods for mining online consumer reviews. Expert Systems with Applications 2012; 9588-9601.
31. Chung C and Pennebaker JW. The psychological functions of function words. Social Communication 2007; 343-359.
32. Bhavsar H and Amit G. A comparative study of training algorithms for supervised machine learning. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE) 2012; 2(4): 2231-2307.
33. Chen YW and Lin CJ. Combining SVMs with various feature selection strategies. In: Feature Extraction: Foundations and Applications. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. New York: Springer, 2006, pp. 315-324.
34. Tausczik YR and Pennebaker JW. The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 2010; 29(1): 24-54.
35. Baccianella S, Esuli A and Sebastiani F. Sentiwordnet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation European Language Resources Association, 2010, pp. 2200-2204.
36. Cambria E, Schuller B, Liu B, Wang H and Havasi C. Knowledge-based approaches to concept-level sentiment analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems 2013; 28(2): 12-14.
37. Ahmad T and Doja MN. Rule based system for enhancing recall for feature mining from short sentences in customer review documents. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering 2012; 4(6): 1211-1219.
38. Feldman R. Techniques and applications for sentiment analysis. Communications of the ACM 2013; 56(4): 82-89.