Self-training from labeled features for sentiment analysis

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 606-616

  He, Yulan ^a   Zhou, Deyu ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Generalized expectation; Opinion mining; Self learned features; Self training; Sentiment analysis

Indexed keywords

GENERALIZED EXPECTATION; OPINION MINING; SELF-LEARNED FEATURES; SELF-TRAINING; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE AGENTS; TEXT PROCESSING;

DATA MINING;

EID: 79957596567     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2010.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. A. Abbasi, H. Chen, and A. Salem Sentiment analysis in multiple languages: Feature selection for opinion classification in web forums ACM Transactions on Information Systems 26 3 2008 1 34
2. Andreevskaia, A.; & Bergler, S. (2008). When specialists and generalists work together: Overcoming domain dependence in sentiment tagging. In Proceedings of the association for computational linguistics and the human language technology conference (ACL-HLT) (pp. 290-298).
3. Argamon, S.; Bloom, K.; Esuli, A.; & Sebastiani, F. (2007). Automatically determining attitude type and force for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 3rd language and technology conference (pp. 218-231).
4. Blitzer, J.; Dredze, M.; & Pereira, F. (2007). Biographies, bollywood, boom-boxes and blenders: Domain adaptation for sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the association for computational linguistics (ACL) (pp. 440-447).
5. Choi, Y.; Cardie, C.; Riloff, E.; & Patwardhan, S. (2005). Identifying sources of opinions with conditional random fields and extraction patterns. In Proceedings of human language technology conference and conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (HLT/EMNLP) (pp. 355-362).
6. Dasgupta, S.; & Ng, V. (2009). Topic-wise, sentiment-wise, or otherwise? Identifying the hidden dimension for unsupervised text classification. In Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (pp. 580-589).
7. Daumé III, H. (2008). Cross-task knowledge-constrained self-training. In Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (pp. 680-688).
8. Druck, G.; Mann, & G.; McCallum, A. (2008). Learning from labeled features using generalized expectation criteria. In The 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference (pp. 595-602).
9. He, Y. (2010). Learning sentiment classification model from labeled features. In Proceeding of the 19th ACM conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM).
10. Kaji, N.; & Kitsuregawa, M. (2006). Automatic construction of polarity-tagged corpus from html documents. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on main conference poster sessions (EMNLP) (pp. 452-459).
11. Kanayama, H.; & Nasukawa, T. (2006). Fully automatic lexicon expansion for domain-oriented sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP) (pp. 355-363).
12. Kim, S.-M.; & Hovy, E. (2004). Determining the sentiment of opinions. In Proceedings of the international conference on computational linguistics (COLING) (pp. 1367-1373).
13. Li, T.; Zhang, Y.; & Sindhwani, V. (2009). A non-negative matrix tri-factorization approach to sentiment classification with lexical prior knowledge. In Proceedings of the joint conference of the annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics and the international joint conference on natural language processing of the asian federation of natural language processing (ACL-IJCNLP) (pp. 244-252).
14. Lin, C.; & He, Y. (2009). Joint sentiment/topic model for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM) (pp. 375-384).
15. Lin, C.; He, Y.; & Everson, R. (2010). A comparative study of bayesian models for unsupervised sentiment detection. In Proceedings of the 14th conference on computational natural language learning (CoNLL) (pp. 144-152).
16. McCallum, A.; Mann, G.; & Druck, G. (2007). Generalized expectation criteria. Tech. Rep. 2007-60, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
17. Medlock, B.; & Briscoe, T. (2007). Weakly supervised learning for hedge classification in scientific literature. In Proceedings of the annual meeting on association for computational linguistics (ACL) (pp. 992-999).
18. Melville, P.; Gryc, W.; & Lawrence, R. D. (2009). Sentiment analysis of blogs by combining lexical knowledge with text classification. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD) (pp. 1275-1284).
19. Narayanan, R.; Liu, B.; & Choudhary, A. (2009). Sentiment analysis of conditional sentences. In Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP) (pp. 180-189).
20. Pang, B.; & Lee, L. (2004). A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In Proceedings of the annual meeting on association for computational linguistics (ACL) (pp. 271-278).
21. Pang, B.; Lee, L.; & Vaithyanathan, S. (2002). Thumbs up?: Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP) (pp. 79-86).
22. Qiu, L.; Zhang, W.; Hu, C.; & Zhao, K. (2009). Selc: A self-supervised model for sentiment classification. In Proceeding of the 18th ACM conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM) (pp. 929-936).
23. Ramakrishnan, G.; Jadhav, A.; Joshi, A.; Chakrabarti, S.; & Bhattacharyya, P. (2003). Question answering via Bayesian inference on lexical relations. In Proceedings of the ACL 2003 workshop on multilingual summarization and question answering (pp. 1-10).
24. Read, J.; & Carroll, J. (2009). Weakly supervised techniques for domain-independent sentiment classification. In Proceeding of the 1st international CIKM workshop on topic-sentiment analysis for mass opinion (pp. 45-52).
25. Schapire, R.; Rochery, M.; Rahim, M.; & Gupta, N. (2002). Incorporating prior knowledge into boosting. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on machine learning (ICML) (pp. 538-545).
26. Tan, S.; Wang, Y.; & Cheng, X. (2008). Combining learn-based and lexicon-based techniques for sentiment detection without using labeled examples. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 743-744).
27. Turney, P. D. (2002). Thumbs up or thumbs down?: Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics (ACL) (pp. 417-424).
28. Turney, P. D.; & Littman, M. L. (2002). Unsupervised learning of semantic orientation from a hundred-billion-word corpus. ArXiv Computer Science e-prints cs.LG/0212012.
29. Whitelaw, C.; Garg, N.; & Argamon, S. (2005). Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the ACM international conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM) (pp. 625-631). (Pubitemid 44022238)
30. Wu, X.; & Srihari, R. (2004). Incorporating prior knowledge with weighted margin support vector machines. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD) (pp. 326-333). (Pubitemid 40114942)
31. Zagibalov, T.; & Carroll, J. (2008a). Automatic seed word selection for unsupervised sentiment classification of Chinese text. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on computational linguistics (COLING) (pp. 1073-1080).
32. Zagibalov, T.; & Carroll, J. (2008b). Unsupervised classification of sentiment and objectivity in chinese text. In Proceedings of the 3rd international joint conference on natural language processing (IJCNLP) (pp. 304-311).
33. Zhao, J.; Liu, K.; & Wang, G. (2008). Adding redundant features for CRFs-based sentence sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP) (pp. 117-126).