Parasponia: A novel system for studying mutualism stability

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 757-763

  Behm, Jocelyn E ^a   Geurts, Rene ^b   Kiers, E Toby ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cooperation; Defection; Partner choice; Rhizobia; Sanctions; Trema

Indexed keywords

PARASPONIA; TREMA;

EID: 84915821242     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.08.007     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Wilson G.W.T., et al. Soil aggregation and carbon sequestration are tightly correlated with the abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: results from long-term field experiments. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:452-461.
2. Vance C.P. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition: plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127:390-397.
3. Bascompte J., Jordano P. Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007, 38:567-593.
4. Ghoul M., et al. Toward an evolutionary definition of cheating. Evolution 2014, 68:318-331.
5. Herre E.A., et al. The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999, 14:49-53.
6. West S.A., et al. Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:R661-R672.
7. Denison R.F. Legume sanctions and the evolution of symbiotic cooperation by rhizobia. Am. Nat. 2000, 156:567-576.
8. West S.A., et al. Sanctions and mutualism stability: when should less beneficial mutualists be tolerated?. J. Evol. Biol. 2002, 15:830-837.
9. Sachs J.L., et al. The evolution of cooperation. Q. Rev. Biol. 2004, 79:135-160.
10. Simms E.L., Taylor D.L. Partner choice in nitrogen-fixation mutualisms of legumes and rhizobia. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2002, 42:369-380.
11. Bull J.J., Rice W.R. Distinguishing mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation. J. Theor. Biol. 1991, 149:63-74.
12. Kiers E.T., Denison R.F. Sanctions, cooperation, and the stability of plant-rhizosphere mutualisms. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2008, 39:215-236.
13. Perret X., et al. Molecular basis of symbiotic promiscuity. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64:180-201.
14. Denison R.F., Kiers E.T. Life histories of symbiotic rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:R775-R785.
15. Edwards D.P., Yu D.W. The roles of sensory traps in the origin, maintenance, and breakdown of mutualism. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2007, 61:1321-1327.
16. Gubry-Rangin C., et al. Partner choice in Medicago truncatula-Sinorhizobium symbiosis. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2010, 277:1947-1951.
17. Sachs J.L., et al. Host control over infection and proliferation of a cheater symbiont. J. Evol. Biol. 2010, 23:1919-1927.
18. Kiers E.T., et al. Host sanctions and the legume-Rhizobium mutualism. Nature 2003, 425:78-81.
19. Oono R., et al. Failure to fix nitrogen by non-reproductive symbiotic rhizobia triggers host sanctions that reduce fitness of their reproductive clonemates. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2011, 278:2698-2703.
20. Frederickson M.E. Rethinking mutualism stability: cheaters and the evolution of sanctions. Q. Rev. Biol. 2013, 88:269-295.
21. Friesen M.L. Widespread fitness alignment in the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis. New Phytol. 2012, 194:1096-1111.
22. Friesen M.L., Heath K.D. One hundred years of solitude: integrating single-strain inoculations with community perspectives in the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis. New Phytol. 2013, 198:7-9.
23. Kiers E.T., et al. Single-strain inoculation may create spurious correlations between legume fitness and rhizobial fitness. New Phytol. 2013, 198:4-6.
24. Oono R., et al. Controlling the reproductive fate of rhizobia: how universal are legume sanctions?. New Phytol. 2009, 183:967-979.
25. Kiers E.T., et al. Measured sanctions: legume hosts detect quantitative variation in Rhizobium cooperation and punish accordingly. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2006, 8:1077-1086.
26. Heath K.D., Tiffin P. Stabilizing mechanisms in a legume-Rhizobium mutualism. Evolution 2009, 63:652-662.
27. Regus J.U., et al. Efficiency of partner choice and sanctions in Lotus is not altered by nitrogen fertilization. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2014, 10.1098/rspb.2013.2587.
28. Ratcliff W.C., et al. Measuring the fitness of symbiotic rhizobia. Symbiosis 2012, 55:85-90.
29. Trinick M.J., Hadobas P.A. Biology of the Parasponia-Bradyrhizobia symbiosis. Plant Soil 1988, 110:177-185.
30. Geurts R., et al. Exploiting an ancient signalling machinery to enjoy a nitrogen fixing symbiosis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15:438-443.
31. Yang M.Q., et al. Molecular phylogenetics and character evolution of Cannabaceae. Taxon 2013, 62:473-485.
32. 2-fixing root nodules in ulmaceae: Parasonia or (and) Trema spp.?. Plant Soil 1978, 49:711-715.
33. Trinick M.J. Symbiosis between Rhizobium and the non-legume Trema aspera. Nature 1973, 244:459-460.
34. Lancelle S.A., Torrey J.G. Early development of Rhizobium-induced root-nodules of Parasponia rigida. 1. Infection and early nodule initiation. Protoplasma 1984, 123:26-37.
35. Roth L.E., Stacey G. Bacterium release into host cells of nitrogen-fixing soybean nodules: the symbiosome membrane comes from three sources. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1989, 49:13-23.
36. Van de Velde W., et al. Plant peptides govern terminal differentiation of bacteria in symbiosis. Science 2010, 327:1122-1126.
37. Price G.D., et al. Structure of nodules formed by Rhizobium strain ANU289 in the nonlegume Parasponia and the legume siratro (Macroptilium atropurpureum). Bot. Gaz. 1984, 145:444-451.
38. Downie J.A. Legume nodulation. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24:R184-R190.
39. Becking J.H. The Rhizobium Symbiosis of the Nonlegume Parasponia 1992, Chapman & Hall.
40. Trinick M.J. Growth of Parasponia in agar tube culture and symbiotic effectiveness of isolates from Parasponia spp. New Phytol. 1980, 85:37-45.
41. 2-fixing symbioses: legumes, actinorhizal plants, Parasponia sp. and cycads. Plant Soil 2005, 274:51-78.
42. Op den Camp R.H.M., et al. Nonlegume Parasponia andersonii deploys a broad Rhizobium host range strategy resulting in largely variable symbiotic effectiveness. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2012, 25:954-963.
43. Trinick M.J., Galbraith J. Structure of root nodules formed by Rhizobium on non-legume Trema cannabina var. scabra. Arch. Microbiol. 1976, 108:159-166.
44. Trinick M.J., Galbraith J. The Rhizobium requirements of the non-legume Parasponia in relationship to the cross-inoculation group concept of legumes. New Phytol. 1980, 86:17-26.
45. Lodwig E.M., et al. Amino-acid cycling drives nitrogen fixation in the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis. Nature 2003, 422:722-726.
46. Sturms R., et al. Trema and Parasponia hemoglobins reveal convergent evolution of oxygen transport in plants. Biochemistry 2010, 49:4085-4093.
47. Brown S.M., Walsh K.B. Anatomy of the legume nodule cortex with respect to nodule permeability. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1994, 21:49-68.
48. Pawlowski K., Bisseling T. Rhizobial and actinorhizal symbioses: what are the shared features?. Plant Cell 1996, 8:1899-1913.
49. Colosimo P.F., et al. Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of ectodysplasin alleles. Science 2005, 307:1928-1933.
50. Maillet F., et al. Fungal lipochitooligosaccharide symbiotic signals in arbuscular mycorrhiza. Nature 2011, 469:58-63.
51. Parniske M., Downie J.A. Plant biology - locks, keys and symbioses. Nature 2003, 425:569-570.
52. Op den Camp R.O., et al. LysM-type mycorrhizal receptor recruited for Rhizobium symbiosis in nonlegume Parasponia. Science 2011, 331:909-912.
53. Bala A., Giller K.E. Symbiotic specificity of tropical tree rhizobia for host legumes. New Phytol. 2001, 149:495-507.
54. Bala A., et al. Distribution and diversity of rhizobia nodulating agroforestry legumes in soils from three continents in the tropics. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12:917-929.
55. Xu K.W., et al. Symbiotic efficiency and phylogeny of the rhizobia isolated from Leucaena leucocephala in arid-hot river valley area in Panxi, Sichuan. China. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97:783-793.
56. Cao Q.Q., et al. Efficiency of Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated root transformation of Parasponia and Trema is temperature dependent. Plant Growth Regul. 2012, 68:459-465.
57. Kiers E.T., et al. Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science 2011, 333:880-882.
58. Jander K.C., et al. Precision of host sanctions in the fig tree-fig wasp mutualism: consequences for uncooperative symbionts. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15:1362-1369.
59. Goto R., et al. Selective flower abortion maintains moth cooperation in a newly discovered pollination mutualism. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:321-329.
60. 2 fixation in angiosperms. Nat. Commun. 2014, 10.1038/ncomms5087.
61. Becking J.H. The Parasponia parviflora-Rhizobium symbiosis - host specificity, growth and nitrogen-fixation under various conditions. Plant Soil 1983, 75:309-342.
62. Becking J.H. The Parasponia parviflora-Rhizobium symbiosis - isotopic nitrogen-fixation, hydrogen evolution and nitrogen-fixation efficiency, and oxygen relations. Plant Soil 1983, 75:343-360.