Does convenience matter in health care delivery? A systematic review of convenience-based aspects of process utility

Value in Health

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 877-887

  Higgins, A ^a   Barnett, J ^a,b   Meads, C ^a   Singh, J ^a   Longworth, L ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

health care; preference elicitation; process utility; systematic review

Indexed keywords

CANCER SCREENING; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HOME CARE; HOME ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT PREFERENCE;

EID: 84915779504     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2670     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. D. Chisholm, A. Healey, and M. Knapp QALYs and mental health care Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 32 1997 68 75
2. P. Dolan, R. Shaw, A. Tsuchiya, and A. Williams QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature Health Econ 14 2005 197 208
3. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2013. London, UK: National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, 2013
4. P. Dolan Using Happiness to Value Health OHE Monograph 2011 Office of Health Economics London, UK
5. K. Payne, M. McAllister, and L.M. Davies Valuing the economic benefits of complex interventions: when maximising health is not sufficient Health Econ 22 2013 258 271
6. G. Mooney Beyond health outcomes: the benefits of health care Health Care Anal 6 1998 99 105
7. C. Donaldson, and P. Shackley Does "process utility" exist? A case study of willingness to pay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy Soc Sci Med 44 1997 699 707
8. Care Quality Commission. Supporting note: mixed sex accommodation. 2011. Available from: http://www.cqc.org.uk/content/supporting-notes. [Accessed September 29, 2014]
9. I. Kennedy Appraising the Value of Innovation and Other Benefits: A Short Study for NICE 2009 Available from: www.gserve.nice.org.uk/media/98F/5C/KennedyStudyFinalReport. [Accessed September 29, 2014]
10. World Health Organization. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19-22 June, 1946. Available from: www.who.int. [Accessed September 9, 2014].
11. V.K. Brennan, and S. Dixon Incorporating process utility into quality adjusted life years: a systematic review of empirical studies Pharmacoeconomics 31 2013 677 691
12. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D.G. Altman Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement PLoS Med 6 2009 e1000097
13. C. Guimaraes, C.A. Marra, and L. Colley A valuation of patients' willingness-to-pay for insulin delivery in diabetes Int J Technol Assess Health Care 25 2009 359 366
14. C.A. Marra, L. Frighetto, and A.F. Goodfellow Willingness to pay to assess patient preferences for therapy in a Canadian setting BMC Health Serv Res 5 2005 43
15. H.M. McTaggart-Cowan, P. Shi, and J.M. Fitzgerald An evaluation of patients' willingness to trade symptom-free days for asthma-related treatment risks: a discrete choice experiment J Asthma 45 2008 630 638
16. B. Oteng, F. Marra, and L.D. Lynd Evaluating societal preferences for human papillomavirus vaccine and cervical smear test screening programme Sex Transm Infect 87 2011 52 57
17. L. Roux, C. Ubach, C. Donaldson, and M. Ryan Valuing the benefits of weight loss programs: an application of the discrete choice experiment Obesity Res 12 2004 1342 1351
18. H. Sadri Contingent valuation of inhaled insulin: a Canadian perspective J Med Econ 10 2007 475 487
19. H. Sadri, L.D. MacKeigan, L.A. Leiter, and T.R. Einarson Willingness to pay for inhaled insulin: a contingent valuation approach Pharmacoeconomics 23 2005 1215 1227
20. C.M. Coley, Y.H. Li, and A.R. Medsger Preferences for home vs hospital care among low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia Arc Intern Med 156 1996 1565 1571
21. H.D. Jampel, P. Parekh, and E. Johnson Preferences for eye drop characteristics among glaucoma specialists: a willingness-to-pay analysis J Glaucoma 14 2005 151 156
22. K.A. Phillips, T. Maddala, and F.R. Johnson Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing Health Serv Res 37 2002 1681 1705
23. J. Chancellor, S. Aballéa, and A. Lawrence Preferences of patients with diabetes mellitus for inhaled versus injectable insulin regimens Pharmacoeconomics 26 2008 217 234
24. D.F. Ossa, A. Briggs, and E. McIntosh Recombinant erythropoietin for chemotherapy-related anaemia: economic value and health-related quality-of-life assessment using direct utility elicitation and discrete choice experiment methods Pharmacoeconomics 25 2007 223 237
25. T. Porteous, M. Ryan, C.M. Bond, and P. Hannaford Preferences for self-care or professional advice for minor illness: a discrete choice experiment Br J Gen Pract 56 2006 911
26. K.S. Boye, L.S. Matza, and K.N. Walter Utilities and disutilities for attributes of injectable treatments for type 2 diabetes Eur J Health Econ 12 2011 219 230
27. V. Watson, M. Ryan, and E. Watson Valuing experience factors in the provision of Chlamydia screening: an application to women attending the family planning clinic Value Health 12 2009 621 623
28. S. Wordsworth, M. Ryan, D. Skåtun, and N. Waugh Women's preferences for cervical cancer screening: a study using a discrete choice experiment Int J Technol Assess Health Care 22 2006 344 350
29. J.A. Whitty, S. Stewart, and M.J. Carrington Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for a home or clinic based program of chronic heart failure management: findings from the Which? trial PLoS One 8 2013 e5834
30. E.S. Johnson, S.D. Sullivan, and E. Mozaffari A utility assessment of oral and intravenous ganciclovir for the maintenance treatment of AIDS-related cytomegalovirus retinitis Pharmacoeconomics 10 1996 623 629
31. R.H. Osborne, R. De Abreu Lourenço, and A. Dalton Quality of life related to oral versus subcutaneous iron chelation: a time trade-off study Value Health 10 2007 451 456
32. J. Jendle, O. Torffvit, and M. Ridderstråle Willingness to pay for diabetes drug therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: based on LEAD clinical programme results J Med Econ 15 Suppl. 2 2012 1 5
33. E. Landfeldt, B. Jablonowska, and E. Norlander Patient preferences for characteristics differentiating ovarian stimulation treatments Hum Reprod 27 2012 760 769
34. M. Bogelund, T. Vilsbøll, and J. Faber Patient preferences for diabetes management among people with type 2 diabetes in Denmark - a discrete choice experiment Curr Med Res Opin 27 2011 2175 2183
35. H. Aust, L.H. Eberhart, and G. Kalmus Relevance of five core aspects of the pre-anesthesia visit: results of a patient survey [in German] Anaesthesist 60 2011 414 420
36. M. Moia, L.G. Mantovani, and M. Carpenedo Patient preferences and willingness to pay for different options of anticoagulant therapy Intern Emerg Med 8 2013 237 243
37. J. Darba, G. Restovic, and L. Kaskens Patient preferences for osteoporosis in Spain: a discrete choice experiment Osteoporos Int 22 2011 1947 1954
38. M. Aristides, A.R. Weston, and P. FitzGerald Patient preference and willingness-to-pay for Humalog Mix25 relative to Humulin 30/70: a multicountry application of a discrete choice experiment Value Health 7 2004 442 454
39. P. Hodgkins, P. Swinburn, and D. Solomon Patient preferences for first-line oral treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a discrete-choice experiment Patient 5 2012 33 44
40. G.W. Torrance Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: a review J Health Econ 5 1986 1 30
41. G.W. Torrance Utility measurement in healthcare Pharmacoeconomics 24 2006 1069 1078
42. P. Dolan, C. Gudex, P. Kind, and A. Williams The time trade off method: results from a general population study Health Econ 5 1996 141 154
43. Claxton K, Walker S, Palmer S, Sculpher M. Appropriate perspectives for health care decisions. York, UK: University of York, 2010
44. K. Shah, C. Praet, and N. Devlin Is the aim of the English health care system to maximize QALYs? J Health Serv Res Pol 17 2012 157 163
45. H. Ascher-Svanum, D.E. Faries, and B. Zhu Medication adherence and long-term functional outcomes in the treatment of schizophrenia in usual care J Clin Psychiatry 67 2006 453
46. M.A. Chesney Factors affecting adherence to antiretroviral therapy Clin Infect Dis 30 Suppl. 2 2000 S171 S176
47. P. Donnan, T. MacDonald, and A. Morris Adherence to prescribed oral hypoglycaemic medication in a population of patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study Diabet Med 19 2002 279 284
48. A. Oliver Testing the internal consistency of the standard gamble in 'success' and 'failure' frames Soc Sci Med 58 2004 2219 2229
49. M. Ryan, J. Ratcliffe, and J. Tucker Using willingness to pay to value alternative models of antenatal care Soc Sci Med 44 1997 371 380
50. E. Lancsar, and J. Louviere Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making Pharmacoeconomics 26 2008 661 677