Patient Preferences and Willingness-To-Pay for a Home or Clinic Based Program of Chronic Heart Failure Management: Findings from the Which? Trial

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Whitty, Jennifer A ^a   Stewart, Simon ^b   Carrington, Melinda J ^b   Calderone, Alicia ^b   Marwick, Thomas ^c   Horowitz, John D ^d,e   Krum, Henry ^f   Davidson, Patricia M ^g,h   Macdonald, Peter S ^h,i,j   Reid, Christopher ^f   Scuffham, Paul A ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b BAKER IDI HEART AND DIABETES INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^c LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^f MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^h ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

ⁱ VICTOR CHANG CARDIAC RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^j UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HEART FAILURE; HOME CARE; HOSPITAL CARE; HUMAN; INCOME; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CHRONIC DISEASE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84874734535     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058347     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Stewart S, Ekman I, Ekman T, Oden A, Rosengren A, (2010) Population impact of heart failure and the most common forms of cancer: a study of 1 162 309 hospital cases in Sweden (1988 to 2004). Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 3: 573-580.
2. Stewart S, Jenkins A, Buchan S, McGuire A, Capewell S, et al. (2002) The current cost of heart failure to the National Health Service in the UK. European Journal of Heart Failure 4: 361-371.
3. Stewart S, MacIntyre K, Capewell S, McMurray JJ, (2003) Heart failure and the aging population: an increasing burden in the 21st century? Heart 89: 49-53.
4. McAlister FA, Stewart S, Ferrua S, McMurray JJ, (2004) Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission: a systematic review of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 44: 810-819.
5. McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Bohm M, et al. (2012) ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. European Heart Journal 33: 1787-1847.
6. Bauman AE, Fardy HJ, Harris PG, (2003) Getting it right: why bother with patient-centred care? Medical Journal of Australia 179: 253-256.
7. Gallacher K, May CR, Montori VM, Mair FS, (2011) Understanding patients' experiences of treatment burden in chronic heart failure using normalization process theory. Annals of Family Medicine 9: 235-243.
8. Driscoll A, Worrall-Carter L, McLennan S, Dawson A, O'Reilly J, et al. (2006) Heterogeneity of heart failure management programs in Australia. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 5: 75-82.
9. Stewart S, Carrington MJ, Marwick T, Davidson PM, Macdonald P, et al. (2011) The WHICH? trial: rationale and design of a pragmatic randomized, multicentre comparison of home- vs. clinic-based management of chronic heart failure patients. European Journal of Heart Failure 13: 909-916.
10. Stewart S, Carrington MJ, Marwick TH, Davidson PM, Macdonald P, et al. (2012) Impact of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: The WHICH? (Which Heart failure Intervention is most Cost-effective & consumer friendly in reducing Hospital care) multicentre, randomized trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 60: 1239-1248.
11. Lancaster K, (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 74: 132-157.
12. Thurstone L, (1927) A law of comparative judgement. Psychol Rev 4: 273-286.
13. McFadden D (1981) Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In: Manski C, McFadden D, editors. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Economic Applications. Boston: MIT Press.
14. de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K, (2012) Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Economics 21: 145-172.
15. Cheraghi-Sohi S, Hole AR, Mead N, McDonald R, Whalley D, et al. (2008) What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities. Annals of Family Medicine 6: 107-115.
16. Whitty JA, Carrington MJ, Stewart S, Holliday J, Marwick T, et al. (2012) Patient preferences for the delivery of disease management in Chronic Heart Failure: A qualitative study. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 27: 201-207.
17. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2004-05) National Health Survey. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4364.0 4364.0.
18. Davidson P, Driscoll A, Huang N, Aho Z, Atherton J, et al. (2010) Multidisciplinary care for people with chronic heart failure: Principles and recommendations for best practice. Melbourne: National Heart Foundation of Australia.
19. Hole AR, (2008) Modelling heterogeneity in patients' preferences for the attributes of a general practitioner appointment. Journal of Health Economics 27: 1078-1094.
20. Mentzakis E, Ryan M, McNamee P, (2011) Using discrete choice experiments to value informal care tasks: exploring preference heterogeneity. Health Economics 20: 930-944.
21. Bech M, Gyrd-Hansen D, (2005) Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. Health Econ 14: 1079-1083.
22. Lancsar E, Savage E, (2004) Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. Health Economics 13: 901-907.
23. Mitchell RM, Carson RT (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future.
24. Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH (2005) Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Campbell D, Hensher DA, Scarpa R, (2011) Nonattendence to attributes in environmental choice analysis: a latent class specification. J Environ Plan Manag 54: 1061-1076.
26. Vijan S, Hayward RA, Ronis DL, Hofer TP, (2005) Brief report: the burden of diabetes therapy: implications for the design of effective patient-centered treatment regimens. Journal of General Internal Medicine 20: 479-482.
27. Kim E, Gupta S, Bolge S, Chen C-C, Whitehead R, et al. (2010) Adherence and outcomes associated with copayment burden in schizophrenia: a cross-sectional survey. J Med Econ 13: 185-192.