Patient preferences for diabetes management among people with type 2 diabetes in Denmark a discrete choice experiment

Current Medical Research and Opinion

Volumn 27, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 2175-2183

  Bøgelund, Mette ^a   Vilsbøll, Tina ^b   Faber, Jens ^b   Henriksen, Jan Erik ^c   Gjesing, Rasmus Prior ^d   Lammert, Morten ^d  

^a Incentive Partners ^*  (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^d NOVO NORDISK A S   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Discrete choice experiment; HbA1c; Hypoglycaemia; Patient preference; Weight; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

ARTICLE; DENMARK; DIABETES CONTROL; FEMALE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAUSEA; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; WEIGHT GAIN; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD GLUCOSE; DENMARK; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS; INJECTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NAUSEA; OUTPATIENTS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; WEIGHT LOSS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80054710687     PISSN: 03007995     EISSN: 14734877     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2011.625404     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Schramm TK, Gislason GH, Kober L, et al. Diabetes patients requiring glucose-lowering therapy and nondiabetics with a prior myocardial infarction carry the same cardiovascular risk: a population study of 3.3 million people. Circulation 2008;117:1945-54 (Pubitemid 351543470)
2. Burdick J, Chase HP, Slover RH, et al. Missed insulin meal boluses and elevated hemoglobin A1c levels in children receiving insulin pump therapy. Pediatrics 2004;113:e221-4
3. Cramer JA. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1218-24 (Pubitemid 38579798)
4. Donnelly LA, Morris AD, Evans JM. Adherence to insulin and its association with glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. QJM 2007; 100:345-50 (Pubitemid 47073810)
5. Morris AD, Boyle DI, McMahon AD, et al. Adherence to insulin treatment, glycaemic control, and ketoacidosis in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The DARTS/MEMO Collaboration. Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland. Medicines Monitoring Unit. Lancet 1997;350:1505-10 (Pubitemid 28036554)
6. Oeyen SG, Hoste EA, Roosens CD, et al. Adherence to and efficacy and safety of an insulin protocol in the critically ill: a prospective observational study. Am J Crit Care 2007;16:599-608
7. Randlov J, Poulsen JU. How much do forgotten insulin injections matter to hemoglobin a1c in people with diabetes? A simulation study. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2008;2:229-35
8. Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C. A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther 2001;23: 1296-310 (Pubitemid 32804122)
9. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Kruger DF, et al. Correlates of insulin injection omission. Diabetes Care 2010;33:240-5
10. Aristides M, Weston AR, FitzGerald P, et al. Patient preference and willingness-to-pay for Humalog Mix25 relative to Humulin 30/70: a multicountry application of a discrete choice experiment. Value Health 2004;7:442-54 (Pubitemid 39038453)
11. Cryer PE. The barrier of hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes 2008; 57:3169-76
12. Amiel SA, Dixon T, Mann R, et al. Hypoglycaemia in Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2008;25:245-54 (Pubitemid 351322690)
13. Cox DJ, Irvine A, Gonder-Frederick L, et al. Fear of hypoglycemia: quantification, validation, and utilization. Diabetes Care 1987;10:617-21 (Pubitemid 17158936)
14. Irvine AA, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick L. Fear of hypoglycemia: relationship to physical and psychological symptoms in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Health Psychol 1992;11:135-8
15. Lundkvist J, Berne C, Bolinder B, et al. The economic and quality of life impact of hypoglycemia. Eur J Health Econ 2005;6:197-202 (Pubitemid 41638842)
16. Marrett E, Radican L, Davies MJ, et al. Assessment of severity and frequency of self-reported hypoglycemia on quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antihyperglycemic agents: a survey study. BMC Res Notes 2011;4:251
17. Leiter LA, Yale JF, Chiasson JL, et al. Assessment of the impact of fear of hypoglycemic episodes on glycemic and hypoglycemia management. Can J Diabetes 2005;29:186-92 (Pubitemid 43741134)
18. Cryer PE. Hypoglycemia: still the limiting factor in the glycemic management of diabetes. Endocr Pract 2008;14:750-6
19. Jendle J, Torffvit O, Ridderstrale M, et al. Willingness to pay for health improvements associated with anti-diabetes treatments for people with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin 2010;26:917-23
20. NIP Or. 'Det Nationale Indikatorprojekt-diabetes' 2009. Available at: https://www.sundhed.dk/Fil.ashx?id1/49993&ext1/4pdf&navn1/ 4diabetes2009-nat-sfa.pdf [Last accessed 18 October 2010]
21. Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ 2000;320:1530-3 (Pubitemid 30330316)
22. Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2003;2:55-64
23. Kuhfeld WF. Marketing research methods in SAS: experimental design, choice conjoint and graphical techniques: SAS Institute, 2005
24. Barker N. A Practical Introduction to the Bootstrap Using the SAS System. Wallingford, UK: Oxford Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2005
25. Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health-a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health 2011;14:403-13
26. Liu JT, Tsou MW, Hammitt JK. Willingness to pay for weight-control treatment. Health Policy 2009;91:211-18
27. Lazaro A, Barberan R, Rubio E. Private and social time preferences for health and money: an empirical estimation. Health Econ 2001;10:351-6 (Pubitemid 32605737)
28. DiBonaventura MD, Wagner JS, Girman CJ, et al. Multinational Internet-based survey of patient preference for newer oral or injectable Type 2 diabetes medication. Patient Prefer Adherence 2010;4:397-406
29. Pratley R, Nauck M, Bailey T, et al. One year of liraglutide treatment offers sustained and more effective glycaemic control and weight reduction compared with sitagliptin, both in combination with metformin, in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, parallel-group, open-label trial. Int J Clin Pract 2011;65:397-407
30. Rubin RR, Peyrot M, Siminerio LM. Health care and patient-reported outcomes: results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1249-55 (Pubitemid 44125918)
31. Louviere JJ, Timmermans HJP. Stated preference and choice models applied to recreation research: a review. Leisure Science 1990;12:9-32
32. Ryan M, Watson V. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ 2009; 18:389-401
33. van Gelder MM, Bretveld RW, Roeleveld N. Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology? Am J Epidemiol 2010;172;(11):1292-8
34. Dannetun E, Tegnell A, Giesecke J. Parents' attitudes towards hepatitis B vaccination for their children. A survey comparing paper and web questionnaires, Sweden 2005. BMC Public Health 2007;7:86
35. Ekman A, Dickman PW, Klint A, et al. Feasibility of using web-based questionnaires in large population-based epidemiological studies. Eur J Epidemiol 2006;21:103-11 (Pubitemid 43341198)
36. Lund E, Gram IT. Response rate according to title and length of questionnaire. Scand J Soc Med 1998;26:154-60
37. Michael Bowling J, Rimer BK, Lyons EJ, et al. Methodologic challenges of e-health research. Eval Program Plann 2006;29:390-6 (Pubitemid 44767125)
38. Sinadinovic K, Wennberg P, Berman AH. Population screening of risky alcohol and drug use via Internet and Interactive Voice Response (IVR): a feasibility and psychometric study in a random sample. Drug Alcohol Depend 2010;114(1):55-60
39. Kongsved SM, Basnov M, Holm-Christensen K, et al. Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions. J Med Internet Res 2007;9:e25
40. Schiøtz M, Bøgelund M, Willaing I. Challenges using online surveys in a Danish population of people with type 2 diabetes. Chronic Illness 2011; 7:in press; Epub ahead of print September 20
41. Loftus Jr EV. A practical perspective on ulcerative colitis: patients' needs from aminosalicylate therapies. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2006;12:1107-13 (Pubitemid 44847467)
42. Bryan S, Roberts T. Preferences for health care programmes-results from a general population discrete choice survey. In: Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M, eds. Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008
43. Bech M, Sorensen J, Lauridsen J. Eliciting women's preferences for a training program in breast self-examination: a conjoint ranking experiment. Value Health 2005;8:479-87 (Pubitemid 41726101)