Crossover formation during rice meiosis relies on interaction of OsMSH4 and OsMSH5

Genetics

Volumn 198, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1447-1456

  Zhang, Lei ^a   Tang, Ding ^a   Luo, Qiong ^b   Chen, Xiaojun ^a,c   Wang, Hongjun ^a   Li, Yafei ^a   Cheng, Zhukuan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GENETICS AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY   (China)

^b YUNNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARRIER PROTEINS AND BINDING PROTEINS; MUTANT PROTEIN; PROTEIN OSMER3; PROTEIN OSMSH4; PROTEIN OSMSH5; PROTEIN OSZIP4; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VEGETABLE PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME 7; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSING OVER; EXON; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE LOCATION; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC PROCEDURES; HEI10 GENE; HOLLIDAY JUNCTION; IMMUNODETECTION; METAPHASE; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; OPEN READING FRAME; PACHYTENE; PHENOTYPE; PLANT CHROMOSOME; POINT MUTATION; POLLEN MOTHER CELL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PULL DOWN ASSAY; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RICE; RNA INTERFERENCE; SELF FERTILIZATION; SISTER CHROMATID; STOP CODON; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX; TELOPHASE; TRANSGENIC PLANT; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MEIOSIS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; ORYZA; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CLONING, MOLECULAR; CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; GENOTYPE; MEIOSIS; MUTATION; ORYZA; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

EID: 84915764407     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.168732     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Agarwal, S., and G. S. Roeder, 2000 Zip3 provides a link between recombination enzymes and synaptonemal complex proteins. Cell 102: 245-255.
2. Allers, T., and M. Lichten, 2001 Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106: 47-57.
3. Baumann, P., F. E. Benson, and S. C. West, 1996 Human Rad51 protein promotes ATP-dependent homologous pairing and strand transfer reactions in vitro. Cell 87: 757-766.
4. Bhalla, N., D. J. Wynne, V. Jantsch, and A. F. Dernburg, 2008 ZHP-3 acts at crossovers to couple meiotic recombination with synaptonemal complex disassembly and bivalent formation in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000235.
5. Bocher, T., A. Barusevicius, T. Snowden, D. Rasio, S. Guerrette et al., 1999 hMSH5: a human MutS homologue that forms a novel heterodimer with hMSH4 and is expressed during spermatogenesis. Cancer Res. 59: 816-822.
6. Borner, G. V., N. Kleckner, and N. Hunter, 2004 Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117: 29-45.
7. Borts, R. H., S. R. Chambers, and M. F. Abdullah, 2000 The many faces of mismatch repair in meiosis. Mutat. Res. 451: 129-150.
8. Chelysheva, L., D. Vezon, A. Chambon, G. Gendrot, L. Pereira et al., 2012 The Arabidopsis HEI10 is a new ZMM protein related to Zip3. PLoS Genet. 8: e1002799.
9. Chen, C., W. Zhang, L. Timofejeva, Y. Gerardin, and H. Ma, 2005 The Arabidopsis ROCK-N-ROLLERS gene encodes a homolog of the yeast ATP-dependent DNA helicase MER3 and is required for normal meiotic crossover formation. Plant J. 43: 321-334.
10. Cheng, C. H., Y. H. Lo, S. S. Liang, S. C. Ti, F. M. Lin et al., 2006 SUMO modifications control assembly of synaptonemal complex and polycomplex in meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 20: 2067-2081.
11. Chowdhury, R., P. R. Bois, E. Feingold, S. L. Sherman, and V. G. Cheung, 2009 Genetic analysis of variation in human meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000648.
12. de Boer, E., P. Stam, A. J. Dietrich, A. Pastink, and C. Heyting, 2006 Two levels of interference in mouse meiotic recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 9607-9612.
13. de Vries, S. S., E. B. Baart, M. Dekker, A. Siezen, D. G. de Rooij et al., 1999 Mouse MutS-like protein Msh5 is required for proper chromosome synapsis in male and female meiosis. Genes Dev. 13: 523-531.
14. Edelmann, W., P. E. Cohen, B. Kneitz, N. Winand, M. Lia et al., 1999 Mammalian MutS homologue 5 is required for chromosome pairing in meiosis. Nat. Genet. 21: 123-127.
15. Fung, J. C., B. Rockmill, M. Odell, and G. S. Roeder, 2004 Imposition of crossover interference through the nonrandom distribution of synapsis initiation complexes. Cell 116: 795- 802.
16. Her, C., N. X. Zhao, X. L. Wu, and J. D. Tompkins, 2007 MutS homologues hMSH4 and hMSH5: diverse functional implications in humans. Front. Biosci. 12: 905-911.
17. Higgins, J. D., S. J. Armstrong, F. C. Franklin, and G. H. Jones, 2004 The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 18: 2557-2570.
18. Higgins, J. D., J. Vignard, R. Mercier, A. G. Pugh, F. C. H. Franklin et al., 2008 AtMSH5 partners AtMSH4 in the class I meiotic crossover pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana, but is not required for synapsis. Plant J. 55: 28-39.
19. Hoffmann, E. R., and R. H. Borts, 2004 Meiotic recombination intermediates and mismatch repair proteins. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 107: 232-248.
20. Hollingsworth, N. M., L. Ponte, and C. Halsey, 1995 MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. Genes Dev. 9: 1728-1739.
21. Keeney, S., C. N. Giroux, and N. Kleckner, 1997 Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88: 375-384.
22. Kneitz, B., P. E. Cohen, E. Avdievich, L. Zhu, M. F. Kane et al., 2000 MutS homolog 4 localization to meiotic chromosomes is required for chromosome pairing during meiosis in male and female mice. Genes Dev. 14: 1085-1097.
23. Kolas, N. K., and P. E. Cohen, 2004 Novel and diverse functions of the DNA mismatch repair family in mammalian meiosis and recombination. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 107: 216-231.
24. Kong, A., G. Thorleifsson, H. Stefansson, G. Masson, A. Helgason et al., 2008 Sequence variants in the RNF212 gene associate with genome-wide recombination rate. Science 319: 1398- 1401.
25. Li, W., and H. Ma, 2006 Double-stranded DNA breaks and gene functions in recombination and meiosis. Cell Res. 16: 402-412.
26. Li, Z., E. I. Golub, R. Gupta, and C. M. Radding, 1997 Recombination activities of HsDmc1 protein, the meiotic human homolog of RecA protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 11221- 11226.
27. Lipkin, S. M., P. B. Moens, V. Wang, M. Lenzi, D. Shanmugarajah et al., 2002 Meiotic arrest and aneuploidy in MLH3-deficient mice. Nat. Genet. 31: 385-390.
28. Luo, Q., D. Tang, M. Wang, W. Luo, L. Zhang et al., 2013 The role of OsMSH5 in crossover formation during rice meiosis. Mol. Plant 6: 729-742.
29. Luo, Q., Y. Li, Y. Shen, and Z. Cheng, 2014 Ten years of gene discovery for meiotic event control in rice. J. Genet. Genomics 41: 125-137.
30. Lynn, A., R. Soucek, and G. V. Borner, 2007 ZMM proteins during meiosis: crossover artists at work. Chromosome Res. 15: 591- 605.
31. Macaisne, N., M. Novatchkova, L. Peirera, D. Vezon, S. Jolivet et al., 2008 SHOC1, an XPF endonuclease-related protein, is essential for the formation of class I meiotic crossovers. Curr. Biol. 18: 1432-1437.
32. Macaisne, N., J. Vignard, and R. Mercier, 2011 SHOC1 and PTD form an XPF-ERCC1-like complex that is required for formation of class I crossovers. J. Cell Sci. 124: 2687-2691.
33. Marcon, E., and P. Moens, 2003 MLH1p and MLH3p localize to precociously induced chiasmata of okadaic-acid-treated mouse spermatocytes. Genetics 165: 2283-2287.
34. Mercier, R., D. Vezon, E. Bullier, J. C. Motamayor, A. Sellier et al., 2001 SWITCH1 (SWI1): a novel protein required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion and for bivalent formation at meiosis. Genes Dev. 15: 1859-1871.
35. Nakagawa, T., and R. D. Kolodner, 2002 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mer3 is a DNA helicase involved in meiotic crossing over. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 3281-3291.
36. Nakagawa, T., H. Flores-Rozas, and R. D. Kolodner, 2001 The MER3 helicase involved in meiotic crossing over is stimulated by single-stranded DNA-binding proteins and unwinds DNA in the 39 to 59 direction. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 31487-31493.
37. Neyton, S., F. Lespinasse, P. B. Moens, R. Paul, P. Gaudray et al., 2004 Association between MSH4 (MutS homologue 4) and the DNA strand-exchange RAD51 and DMC1 proteins during mammalian meiosis. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 10: 917-924.
38. Nonomura, K., M. Nakano, M. Eiguchi, T. Suzuki, and N. Kurata, 2006 PAIR2 is essential for homologous chromosome synapsis in rice meiosis I. J. Cell Sci. 119: 217-225.
39. Novak, J. E., P. B. Ross-Macdonald, and G. S. Roeder, 2001 The budding yeast Msh4 protein functions in chromosome synapsis and the regulation of crossover distribution. Genetics 158: 1013-1025.
40. Osman, K., J. D. Higgins, E. Sanchez-Moran, S. J. Armstrong, and F. C. Franklin, 2011 Pathways to meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 190: 523-544.
41. Page, S. L., and R. S. Hawley, 2004 The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20: 525-558.
42. Perry, J., N. Kleckner, and G. V. Borner, 2005 Bioinformatic analyses implicate the collaborating meiotic crossover/chiasma proteins Zip2, Zip3, and Spo22/Zip4 in ubiquitin labeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 17594-17599.
43. Puizina, J., J. Siroky, P. Mokros, D. Schweizer, and K. Riha, 2004 Mre11 deficiency in Arabidopsis is associated with chromosomal instability in somatic cells and Spo11-dependent genome fragmentation during meiosis. Plant Cell 16: 1968-1978.
44. Reynolds, A., H. Qiao, Y. Yang, J. K. Chen, N. Jackson et al., 2013 RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis. Nat. Genet. 45: 269-278.
45. Ross-Macdonald, P., and G. S. Roeder, 1994 Mutation of a meiosis- specific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell 79: 1069-1080.
46. Sanchez Moran, E., S. J. Armstrong, J. L. Santos, F. C. Franklin, and G. H. Jones, 2001 Chiasma formation in Arabidopsis thaliana accession Wassileskija and in two meiotic mutants. Chromosome Res. 9: 121-128.
47. Santucci-Darmanin, S., D. Walpita, F. Lespinasse, C. Desnuelle, T. Ashley et al., 2000 MSH4 acts in conjunction with MLH1 during mammalian meiosis. FASEB J. 14: 1539-1547.
48. Santucci-Darmanin, S., S. Neyton, F. Lespinasse, A. Saunieres, P. Gaudray et al., 2002 The DNA mismatch-repair MLH3 protein interacts with MSH4 in meiotic cells, supporting a role for this MutL. homolog in mammalian meiotic recombination. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11: 1697-1706.
49. Schwacha, A., and N. Kleckner, 1997 Interhomolog bias during meiotic recombination: meiotic functions promote a highly differentiated interhomolog-only pathway. Cell 90: 1123-1135.
50. Shao, T., D. Tang, K. Wang, M. Wang, L. Che et al., 2011 OsREC8 is essential for chromatid cohesion and metaphase I monopolar orientation in rice meiosis. Plant Physiol. 156: 1386-1396.
51. Shen, Y., D. Tang, K. Wang, M. Wang, J. Huang et al., 2012 The role of ZIP4 in homologous chromosome synapsis and crossover formation in rice meiosis. J. Cell Sci. 125(Pt 11): 2581-2591.
52. Snowden, T., S. Acharya, C. Butz, M. Berardini, and R. Fishel, 2004 hMSH4-hMSH5 recognizes Holliday junctions and forms a meiosis-specific sliding clamp that embraces homologous chromosomes. Mol. Cell 15: 437-451.
53. Stack, S., J. Sherman, L. Anderson, and L. Herickhoff, 1993 Meiotic nodules in vascular plants, pp. 301-311 in Chromosomes Today. Springer-Verlag, New York.
54. Sym, M., and G. S. Roeder, 1994 Crossover interference is abolished in the absence of a synaptonemal complex protein. Cell 79: 283-292.
55. Tsubouchi, T., H. Zhao, and G. S. Roeder, 2006 The meiosisspecific zip4 protein regulates crossover distribution by promoting synaptonemal complex formation together with zip2. Dev. Cell 10: 809-819.
56. Tsubouchi, T., A. J. Macqueen, and G. S. Roeder, 2008 Initiation of meiotic chromosome synapsis at centromeres in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 22: 3217-3226.
57. Wang, K., M. Wang, D. Tang, Y. Shen, B. Qin et al., 2011 PAIR3, an axis-associated protein, is essential for the recruitment of recombination elements onto meiotic chromosomes in rice. Mol. Biol. Cell 22: 12-19.
58. Wang, K., M. Wang, D. Tang, Y. Shen, C. Miao et al., 2012 The role of rice HEI10 in the formation of meiotic crossovers. PLoS Genet. 8: e1002809.
59. Wang, K. J., D. Tang, M. Wang, J. F. Lu, H. X. Yu et al., 2009 MER3 is required for normal meiotic crossover formation, but not for presynaptic alignment in rice. J. Cell Sci. 122: 2055-2063.
60. Wijeratne, A. J., C. Chen, W. Zhang, L. Timofejeva, and H. Ma, 2006 The Arabidopsis thaliana PARTING DANCERS gene encoding a novel protein is required for normal meiotic homologous recombination. Mol. Biol. Cell 17: 1331-1343.
61. Youds, J. L., and S. J. Boulton, 2011 The choice in meiosis: defining the factors that influence crossover or non-crossover formation. J. Cell Sci. 124: 501-513.
62. Zalevsky, J., A. J. MacQueen, J. B. Duffy, K. J. Kemphues, and A. M. Villeneuve, 1999 Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast. Genetics 153: 1271-1283.
63. Zickler, D., and N. Kleckner, 1999 Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33: 603-754.