US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29

Value in Health

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 846-853

  Craig, Benjamin M ^a   Reeve, Bryce B ^b   Brown, Paul M ^c   Cella, David ^d   Hays, Ron D ^e,f   Lipscomb, Joseph ^g   Simon Pickard, A ^h   Revicki, Dennis A ⁱ  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^g EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

ⁱ EVIDERA   (United States)

Author keywords

discrete choice experiments; patient reported outcomes; quality adjusted life years

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PAIN INTENSITY; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM 29; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; SLEEP; SOCIAL INTERACTION; UNITED STATES; ADOLESCENT; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH STATUS; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANXIETY; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DEPRESSION; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ECONOMIC; PAIN; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SLEEP; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84915737151     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. What is comparative effectiveness research. Available from: http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/what-is-comparative-effectiveness-research1/. [Accessed December 3, 2012].
2. C.M. Kozma, C.E. Reeder, and R.M. Schulz Economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes: a planning model for pharmacoeconomic research Clin Ther 15 1993 1121 1132
3. S. Fanshel, and J.W. Bush A health-status index and its application to health-services outcomes Oper Res 18 1970 1021 1066
4. J. Lipscomb, M. Drummond, and D. Fryback Retaining, and enhancing, the QALY Value Health 12 Suppl 2009 S18 S26
5. P.J. Neumann, and D. Greenberg Is the United States ready for QALYs? Health Affairs (Project Hope) 28 2009 1366 1371
6. D. Cella, W. Riley, and A. Stone The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008 J Clin Epidemiol 63 2010 1179 1194
7. D.A. Revicki, A.K. Kawata, and N. Harnam Predicting EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items and domain item banks in a United States sample Qual Life Res 18 2009 783 791
8. Craig B, Reeve BB. Methods report on the PROMIS valuation study: year 1. 2012. Available from: http://labpages.moffitt.org/craigb/Publications/Report120928.pdf. [Accessed October 29, 2012].
9. N. Bansback, J. Brazier, A. Tsuchiya, and A. Anis Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values J Health Econ 31 2012 306 318
10. B.M. Craig, A.S. Pickard, E. Stolk, and J.E. Brazier US valuation of the SF-6D Med Decis Making 33 2013 793 803
11. R. Viney, R. Norman, and J. Brazier An Australian discrete choice experiment to value EQ-5D health states Health Econ 23 2014 729 742
12. B.M. Craig, and J.J. Busschbach The episodic random utility model unifies time trade-off and discrete choice approaches in health state valuation Popul Health Metr 7 2009 3
13. D.C. Hadorn, R.D. Hays, J. Uebersax, and T. Hauber Improving task comprehension in the measurement of health state preferences - a trial of informational cartoon figures and a paired-comparison task J Clin Epidemiol 45 1992 233 243
14. B.M. Craig, and J.J.V. Busschbach Revisiting United States valuation of EQ-5D states J Health Econ 30 2011 1057 1063
15. R.L. Keeney, and H. Raiffa Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs 1993 Cambridge University Press New York, NY
16. K. Adams, E. Bayliss, and D. Blumenthal Universal health outcome measures for older persons with multiple chronic conditions J Am Geriatr Soc 60 2012 2333 2341
17. C.B. Forrest, K.B. Bevans, and C. Tucker Commentary: The patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) for children and youth: application to pediatric psychology J Pediatr Psychol 37 2012 614 621
18. M. Hinchcliff, J.L. Beaumont, and K. Thavarajah Validity of two new patient-reported outcome measures in systemic sclerosis: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-Item Health Profile and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Dyspnea short form Arthritis Care Res 63 2011 1620 1628
19. D.T. Selewski, D.N. Collier, and J. MacHardy Promising insights into the health related quality of life for children with severe obesity Health Qual Life Outcomes 11 2013 29
20. PROMIS-29 Profile v1.0. 2008-2012 PROMIS Health Organization and PROMIS Cooperative Group. Available from: https://www.assessmentcenter.net/ac1//files/pdf/44b7636201a34267a9213db7f69f2c6d.pdf. [Accessed June 6, 2012].
21. B. Craig, R. Hays, and A.S. Pickard Comparison of US panel vendors for online surveys J Med Int Res 15 2013 e260
22. Craig B, Owens MA. Methods report on the Child Health Valuation study (CHV): year 1. 2013. Available from: http://labpages.moffitt.org/craigb/Publications/CHVMethods-130917.pdf. [Accessed October 5, 2013].
23. M. Ryan, K. Gerard, and M. Amaya-Amaya Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care [electronic resource] 2008 Springer Dordrecht
24. D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice - mapping bounded rationality Am Psychol 58 2003 697 720
25. J.F.P. Bridges, A.B. Hauber, and D. Marshall Conjoint analysis applications in health - a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force Value Health 14 2011 403 413
26. PROMIS Assessment Center. PROMIS terms and conditions. 2012. Available from: https://www.assessmentcenter.net/documents/PROMIS%20Terms%20and%20Conditions%20v8%20July10-2012.pdf. [Accessed August 08, 2012].
27. National Institutes of Health. PROMIS: dynamic tools to measure health outcomes from the patient perspective. Available from: http://www.nihpromis.org/#1. [Accessed June 27, 2012].
28. A. Alexandrov Characteristics of single-item measures in Likert scale format Electr J Bus Res Meth 8 2010 1 12
29. S.D. Swain, D. Weathers, and R.W. Niedrich Assessing three sources of misresponse to reversed Likert items J Mark Res 45 2008 116 131
30. K. Chrzan Using partial profile choice experiments to handle large numbers of attributes Int J Market Res 52 2010 827 840
31. J. Louviere, and E. Lancsar Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future Health Econ Policy Law 4 2009 527 546
32. F.M. Urban The Application of Statistical Methods to the Problems of Psychophysics 1908 Psychological Clinic Press Philadelphia
33. 2) R.D. Bock, L.V. Jones, The Measurement and Prediction of Judgment and Choice 1968 Holden-Day San Francisco
34. H.H. Liu, D. Cella, and R. Gershon Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel J Clin Epidemiol 63 2010 1169 1178
35. N. Luo, M. Li, E.A. Stolk, and N.J. Devlin The effects of lead time and visual aids in TTO valuation: a study of the EQ-VT framework Eur J Health Econ 14 Suppl. 1 2013 S15 S24
36. W.J. Furlong, D.H. Feeny, G.W. Torrance, and R.D. Barr The Health Utilities Index (HUI (R)) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies Ann Med 33 2001 375 384
37. Brooks R, Rabin R, De Charro F. The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective: Evidence from the EuroQol BIO MED Research Programme. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
38. E.M. Andresen, B.M. Rothenberg, and R.M. Kaplan Performance of a self-administered mailed version of the Quality of Well-Being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults Med Care 36 1998 1349 1360
39. D.G. Fryback, M. Palta, and D. Cherepanov Comparison of 5 health-related quality-of-life indexes using item response theory analysis Med Decis Making 30 2010 5 15
40. D. Feeny, K. Spritzer, and R.D. Hays Agreement about identifying patients who change over time: cautionary results in cataract and heart failure patients Med Decis Making 32 2012 273 286
41. R.M. Kaplan, S. Tally, and R.D. Hays Five preference-based indexes in cataract and heart failure patients were not equally responsive to change J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 497 506
42. I. Bateman, A. Munro, and B. Rhodes Does part-whole bias exist? An experimental investigation Econ J 107 1997 322 332
43. B.M. Craig, J.J. Busschbach, and J.A. Salomon Modeling ranking, time trade-off, and visual analog scale values for EQ-5D health states: a review and comparison of methods Med Care 47 2009 634 641
44. B.M. Craig, B.B. Reeve, and D. Cella Demographic differences in health preferences in the United States Med Care 52 2013 307 313
45. P.W. Sullivan, and V. Ghushchyan Preference-based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States Med Decis Making 26 2006 410 420
46. T.O. Tengs, and A. Wallace One thousand health-related quality-of-life estimates Med Care 38 2000 583 637