Early aqueous suppressant therapy on hypertensive phase following glaucoma drainage device procedure: A randomized prospective trial

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 248-257

  Law, Simon K ^a   Kornmann, Helen L ^a   Giaconi, Joann A ^a   Kwong, Allen ^a   Tran, Eric ^a   Caprioli, Joseph ^a  

^a JULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Glaucoma drainage device; Hypertensive phase; Intraocular pressure

Indexed keywords

ALPHA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CARBONATE DEHYDRATASE INHIBITOR; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; AHMED GLAUCOMA VALVE; AHMED VALVE; AQUEOUS HUMOR; ARTICLE; CLOSED ANGLE GLAUCOMA; CONGENITAL GLAUCOMA; CORNEA EDEMA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANT; GLAUCOMA SURGERY; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEOVASCULAR GLAUCOMA; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STRABISMUS; TRABECULECTOMY; UVEITIS; VERY ELDERLY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECTS; MIDDLE AGED; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; AQUEOUS HUMOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA; GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANTS; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84914819653     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: 1536481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000131     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Minckler DS, Francis BA, Hodapp EA, et al. Aqueous shunts in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1089-1098.
2. Gedde SJ, Panarelli JF, Banitt MR, et al. Evidenced-based comparison of aqueous shunts. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013; 24:87-95.
3. Minckler DS, Shammas A, Wilcox M, et al. Experimental studies of aqueous filtration using Molteno implant. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1987;85:368-392.
4. Lieberman MF, Ewing RH. Drainage implant surgery for refractory glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1990;30:198-208.
5. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J. Evaluation of the hypertensive phase after insertion of the Ahmed glaucoma valve. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:1001-1008.
6. Smith MF, Sherwood MB, McGorray SP. Comparison of the double-plate Molteno drainage implant with the Schocket procedure. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:1246-1250.
7. Heuer DK, Lloyd MA, Abrams DA, et al. Which is better? One or two? A randomized clinical trial of single-plate versus double-plate Molteno implantation for glaucomas in aphakia and pseudophakia. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:1512-1519.
8. Fellenbaum PS, Almeida AR, Minckler DS, et al. Krupin disk implantation for complicated glaucomas. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1178-1182.
9. Ayyala RS, Zurakowski D, Monshizadeh R, et al. Comparison of double-plate Molteno and Ahmed glaucoma valve in patients with advanced uncontrolled glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2002;33:94-101.
10. Tsai JC, Johnson CC, Dietrich MS. The Ahmed shunt versus the Baerveldt shunt for refractory glaucoma: a single-surgeon comparison of outcome. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1814-1821.
11. Syed HM, Law SK, Nam SH, et al. Baerveldt-350 implant versus Ahmed valve for refractory glaucoma: a case-controlled comparison. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:38-45.
12. Ayyala RS, Zurakowshi D, Smith JA, et al. A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1968-1976.
13. Moss EB, Trope GE. Assessment of closing pressure in silicone Ahmed FP7 glaucoma valves. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:489-493.
14. Law SK, Nguyen A, Coleman AL, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy between silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valves in refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1514-1520.
15. Chang L, Crowston JG, Cordeiro MF, et al. The role of the immune system in conjunctival wound healing after glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;45:49-68.
16. Molteno AC, Fucik M, Dempster AG, et al. Otago Glaucoma Surgery Outcome Study: factors controlling capsule fibrosis around Molteno implants with histopathological correlation. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2198-2206.
17. Papadaki TG, Zacharopoulos IP, Pasquale LR, et al. Longterm results of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation for uveitic glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:62-69.
18. Holladay JT. Proper method for calculating average visual acuity. J Refract Surg. 1997;13:388-391.
19. Minckler DS, Heuer DK, Hasty B, et al. Clinical experience with the single-plate Molteno implant in complicated glaucomas. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:1181-1188.
20. Yuen D, Buys Y, Jin YP, et al. Corticosteroids versus NSAID on intraocular pressure and the hypertensive phase after Ahmed glaucoma valve surgery. J Glaucoma. 2011; 20:439-444.
21. Molteno TE, Dempster AG. Methods of controlling bleb fibrosis around drainage implants. In: Mills KB, ed. Fourth International Symposium of the Northern Eye Institute. 1st ed. Manchester, UK: Pergamon Press; 1988:192-211.
22. Siegner SW, Netland PA, Urban RC Jr., et al. Clinical experience with the Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1298-1307.