Assessment of closing pressure in silicone ahmed fp7 glaucoma valves

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 489-493

  Moss, Edward B ^a,b   Trope, Graham E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aqueous drainage device; Glaucoma drainage device; Glaucoma valve; IOP

Indexed keywords

SILICONE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; ISOTONIC SOLUTION; SILASTIC;

ARTICLE; CANNULA; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FORCE; FP 7 AHMED GLAUCOMA VALVE; GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MANOMETRY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERFUSION PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPERFUSION; SURGEON; AQUEOUS HUMOR; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; METABOLISM; PERFUSION; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESSURE; SECRETION;

AQUEOUS HUMOR; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANTS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; ISOTONIC SOLUTIONS; MANOMETRY; PERFUSION; PRESSURE; SILICONE ELASTOMERS;

EID: 58149116848     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181622532     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Eisenberg DL, Koo EY, Hafner G, et al. In vitro flow properties of glaucoma implant devices. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30: 662-667.
2. Law SK, Nguyen A, Coleman AL, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy between silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valves in refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1514-1520.
3. Ishida K, Netland PA, Costa VP, et al. Comparison of polypropylene and silicone Ahmed glaucoma valves. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1320-1326.
4. Mackenzie PJ, Schertzer RM, Isbister CM. Comparison of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valves: two-year follow-up. Can J Ophthalmol. 2004;42:227-232.
5. Brasil MVOM, Rockwood EJ, Smith SD. Comparison of silicone and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valve implants. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:36-41.
6. Silver DM, Geyer G. Pressure-volume relation for the living human eye. Curr Eye Res. 2000;20:115-120.
7. Coleman AL, Hill R, Wilson MR. Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:23-31.
8. Ayyala RS, Zurakowski D, Smith JA, et al. A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1968-1976.
9. Huang MC, Netland PA, Coleman AL, et al. Intermediate-term clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:27-33.
10. Wilson MR, Mendis U, Smith SD, et al. Ahmed glaucoma valve implant vs. trabeculectomy in the surgical treatment of glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:267-273.
11. Kee C. Prevention of early postoperative hypotony by partial ligation of silicone tube in Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. J Glaucoma. 2001;10:466-469.
12. Syed HM, Law SK, Nam SH, et al. Baerveldt-350 implant versus Ahmed valve for refractory glaucoma: a case-controlled comparison. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:38-45.
13. Ayyala RS, Harman LE, Michelini-Norris B, et al. Comparison of different biomaterials for glaucoma drainage devices. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:233-236.
14. Ayyala RS, Michelini-Norris B, Flores A, et al. Comparison of different biomaterials for glaucoma drainage devices: part 2. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1081-1084.
15. Francis BA, Cortes A, Chen J, et al. Characteristics of glaucoma drainage implants during dynamic and steady-state flow conditions. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1708-1714.
16. Stay MS, Pan T, Brown JD, et al. Thin-film coupled fluid-solid analysis of flow through the Ahmed glaucoma drainage device. J Biomech Eng. 2005;127:776.