Social participation post stroke: A meta-ethnographic review of the experiences and views of community-dwelling stroke survivors

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 36, Issue 24, 2014, Pages 2031-2043

  Woodman, Portia ^a   Riazi, Afsane ^b   Pereira, Carla ^a,c   Jones, Fiona ^a  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO DE SETÚBAL   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Community life; Employment; Interpersonal relationships; Meta ethnography; Participation; Social life; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT LIVING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF CARE; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; STROKE; SURVIVOR;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ANTHROPOLOGY, CULTURAL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; HUMANS; INDEPENDENT LIVING; SELF CARE; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; STROKE; SURVIVORS;

EID: 84914689543     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.887796     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Burton C. Living with stroke: a phenomenological study. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:301-9.
2. Heinemann A. Putting outcome measurement in context: a rehabilitation psychology perspective. Rehabil Psychol 2005;50:6-14.
3. Department of Health. National Stroke Strategy. London: The Stationery Office; 2007.
4. Commissioning Support for London. Life after stroke: commissioning guide. A guide for commissioners in the NHS and local authorities to develop and improve their service to stroke survivors living in their communities. London; 2010.
5. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and health ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
6. Oliver M. Theories of disability in health practice and research. Br Med J 1998;317:1446-9.
7. Cott C, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1566-74.
8. World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and Health ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
9. Whiteneck G, Dijkers M. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:S22-35.
10. Dijkers M. Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of participation: an overview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S5-16.
11. Salter K, Jutai J, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:507-28.
12. Jette A, Haley S, Kooyoomjian J. Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct? J Rehabil Med 2003;35:145-9.
13. Barclay-Goddard R, Ripat J, Mayo N. Developing a model of participation post stroke: a mixed-methods approach. Qual Life Res 2012;21:417-26.
14. Haggstrom A, Larsson M. The complexity of participation in daily life: a qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:89-95.
15. Wolfe C, Rudd A, Mckevitt C, et al. Top ten priorities for stroke services research: a summary of the analysis of research for the national stroke strategy. Kings College London: University of London; 2007.
16. Bondas T, Hall T. Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qual Health Res 2007;17:113-21.
17. Dalemans R, de Witte L, Lemmens J, et al. Measuring for rating social participation in people with aphasia: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:542-55.
18. Daniel K, Wolfe C, Busch M, Mckevitt C. What are the social consequences of stroke for working aged adults: a systematic review. Stroke 2009;40:e431-40.
19. Noblit GW, Hare RD. Meta ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1988.
20. Petticrew M, Roberts H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2006.
21. Rees R, Oliver K, Woodman J, Thomas J. Children's views about obesity, body size, shape and weight: a systematic review. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2009.
22. Munro S, Lewin S, Smith H, et al. Patience adherence to tuberculosis treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Med 2007;4:1230-44.
23. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:45.
24. Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, et al. Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:21.
25. Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, et al. Using Meta ethnography to synthesis qualitative research: a worked example. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7:209-15.
26. Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:671-84.
27. Greenwood N, Mackenzie A. Informal caring for stroke survivors: meta-ethnographic review of qualitative literature. Maturitas 2010; 66:268-76.
28. Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H, Potter J, Penhale B. Working after stroke: survivors experience and perception of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29:1858-69.
29. Brady M, Clark A, Dickson S, et al. The impact of stroke related dysarthria on social participation and implication for rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:178-86.
30. Dickson S, Barbour R, Brady M, et al. Patients experience of disruptions associated with post stroke dysarthria. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2008;43:135-53.
31. Gilworth G, Phil M, Cert Ad, et al. Personal experience of returning to work following stroke: an exploratory study. Work 2009;34: 95-103.
32. Legg L, Stott D, Ellis G, Sellars C. Volunteer stroke services (VSS) groups for patients with communication difficulties after stroke: a qualitative analysis of the value of groups to their users. Clin Rehabil 2007;21:794-804.
33. Lock S, Jordan L, Bryan K, Maxim J. Work after stroke focussing on barriers and enablers. Disab Soc 2005;20:33-47.
34. Logan P, Dyas J, Gladman J. Using an interview study of transport use by people who have had a stroke to inform rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:703-8.
35. Northcott S, Hilari K. Why do people lose their friends after stroke? Int Lang Commun Dis 2011;46:524-34.
36. Parr S. Living with severe aphasia: tracking social exclusion. Aphasiology 2007;21:98-123.
37. Robison J, Wiles R, Ellis-Hill C, et al. Resuming previously valued activities post-stroke: who or what helps? Disabil Rehabil 2009;31: 1555-66.
38. Thompson H, Ryan A. Impact of stroke consequences on spousal relationships from the perspective of the person with stroke. J Clin Nurs 2009;18:1803-11.
39. Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. A patient centred study of the consequences of stroke. Clin Rehabil 1998;12:338-47.
40. Reid D. Impact of the environment on role performance in older stroke survivors living at home. Int J Ther Rehabil 2004;11: 567-73.
41. Murray C, Harrison B. The meaning and experience of being a stroke survivor: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:808-16.
42. Salter K, Hellings C, Floey N, Teasell R. The experience of living with stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. J Rehabil Med 2008;40: 595-602.
43. Dalemans R, de Witte L, Wade D, van den Heuvel W. Social participation through the eyes of people with aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2010;45:537-50.
44. Rudman D, Herbert D, Reid D. Living in a restricted occupational world: the occupational experiences of stroke survivors who are wheelchair users and their caregivers. Can J Occup Ther 2006;73: 141-52.
45. Amarshi F, Artero L, Reid D. Exploring social and leisure participation among stroke survivors: part two. Int J Ther Rehabil 2006;13:166-70.
46. O'Sullivan C, Chard G. An exploration of participation in leisure activities post stroke. Aust Occup Ther J 2010;57:159-66.
47. Morgan D, Jongbloed L. Factors influencing leisure activities following a stroke: an exploratory study. Can J Occup Ther 1990;57: 223-9.
48. Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Bravo G, et al. Changes in participation after a mild stroke: quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Topics Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:59-68.
49. Davidson B, Howe T, Worrall L, et al. Social participation for older people with aphasia: the impact of communication disability on friendships. Topics Stroke Rehabil 2008;15:325-40.
50. Lynch E, Butt Z, Heinemann A, et al. A qualitative study of quality of life after stroke: the importance of social relationships. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:518-23.
51. McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, et al. The Stroke Association UK Stroke Survivor Needs Survey. London: The Stroke Association; 2010.
52. Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1445-60.
53. Gray D, Hollingsworth H, Stark S, Morgan K. Participation Survey/Mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:189-97.
54. Hjelmblink F, Holmstrom I, Sanner M. The meaning of rehabilitation for older people who have survived stroke. J Nurs Healthcare Chronic Illn 2009;1:186-95.
55. Erikson A, Park M, Tham K. Belonging: a qualitative longitudinal study of what matters for persons after stroke during one year of rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2010;42:831-8.
56. Whalley Hammell K. Dimensions of meaning in the occupations of daily life. Canadian J Occup Ther 2004;71:296-305.
57. Barker D, Reid D, Cott C. Acceptance and meaning of wheelchair use in senior stroke survivors. J Occup Ther 2004;58:221-30.
58. Hammel J, Jones R, Gossett A, Morgan E. Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach. Topics Stroke Rehabil 2006; 13:43-58.
59. Cardol M, de Jong B, van den Bos G, et al. Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:27-35.
60. D'Alisa S, Baudo S, Mauro A, Miscio G. How does stroke restrict participation in long-term post-stroke survivors? Acta Neurol Scand 2005;112:157-62.
61. Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Social and practical strategies described by people living at home with stroke. Health Social Care Commun 1999;7:120-8.
62. Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levasseur M. Optimal participation: a reflective look. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1231-5.
63. Wood J, Connelly D, Maly M. Getting back to real living: a qualitative study of the process of community reintegration after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:1045-56.
64. Perenboom R, Chorus A. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:577-87.
65. Berges I, Seale G, Ostir G. The role of positive affect on social participation following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34: 2119-23.
66. Playford D, Siegert R, Levack W, Freeman J. Areas of consensus and controversy about goal setting in rehabilitation: a conference report. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:334-44.
67. Levack W, Dean S, Siegert R, McPherson K. Navigating patient centred goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: how clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Educ Couns 2011;85:206-13.
68. Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for? Disabil Rehabil 2003;25: 596-601.
69. Wade D, Halligan P. New wine in old bottles: the WHO ICF as an explanatory model of human behaviour. Clin Rehabil 2003;17: 349-54.
70. Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. The issue is-an occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:569-76.
71. Jelsma J. Use of the international Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a literature review. J Rehabil Med 2009;41: 1-12.
72. Cerniauskaite M, Quintas R, Boldt C, et al. Systematic literature review on the ICF from 2001 to 2009: its use, implementation and operationalisation. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:281-309.
73. Dahl T. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: an introduction and discussion of its potential impact on rehabilitation services and research. J Rehabil Med 2002;34: 201-4.
74. Imrie R. Demystifying disability: a review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Sociol Health Illn 2004;26:287-305.
75. McIntyre A, Tempest S. Two steps forward, one step back? A commentary on the disease-specific core sets of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1474-9.
76. National Audit Office. Progress in improving stroke care, a good practice guide. London: The Stationary Office; 2010.
77. Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009;9:59.
78. Levack W. The role of qualitative metasynthesis in evidence-based physical therapy. Phys Ther Rev 2012;17:390-7.
79. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Post M, Asano M. Participation after spinal cord injury: the evolution of conceptualization and measurement. J Neurol Phys Ther 2005;29:147-56.