Analytical performance of the new analyzer BA 400 biosystems with LED technology

Clinical Laboratory

Volumn 60, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1943-1947

  Molinario, Rossana ^a   Autilio, Chiara ^a   Daloiso, Pio Dante ^a   Pocino, Krizia ^a   Colacicco, Luigi ^a   Zuppi, Cecilia ^a   Antenucci, Mirca ^a  

^a FONDAZIONE POLICLINICO UNIVERSITARIO A GEMELLI IRCCS   (Italy)

Author keywords

Analytical performance; BA 400 LED technology; Evaluation; Method comparison

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

BLOOD; BLOOD ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; MATERIALS TESTING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

AUTOMATION, LABORATORY; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BLOOD CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84914146085     PISSN: 14336510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2014.140312     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). User demonstration of performance for precision and trueness. CLSI, 940 Wayne, PA, USA 2005, CLSI document EP15-A2.
2. Westgard JO, Darcy T. The truth about quality: medical usefulness and analytical reliability of laboratory tests. Clinica Chimica Acta 2004;346(1):3-11.
3. Westgard JO. Internal quality control planning and implementation strategies. Ann Clin Biochem 2003;40:593-611.
4. Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava F, et al. Current databases on biologic variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59:491-500 (final version 2014 database).
5. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.