Host-parasite interactions and the evolution of nonrandom mating

Evolution

Volumn 68, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 3570-3580

  Greenspoon, Philip B ^a   M'Gonigle, Leithen K ^b,c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Coevolution; Disassortative mating; Maternal effects; Modifier model; Parasites

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; HYBRIDIZATION; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PLOIDY; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PLOIDIES; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84914133376     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12538     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aeschlimann, P. B., M. A. Häberli, T. B. H. Reusch, T. Boehm, and M. Milinski . 2003. Female sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimize MHC allele number during mate selection. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54:119-126.
2. Agarwal, V. K., and J. B. Sinclair . 1997. Principles of seed pathology. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
3. Agrawal, A. F. 2006. Similarity selection and the evolution of sex: revisiting the Red Queen. PLoS Biol. 4:1364-1371.
4. Agrawal, A. F., and S. P. Otto . 2006. Host-parasite coevolution and selection on sex through the effects of segregation. Am. Nat. 168:617-629.
5. Carlier, Y., C. Truyens, P. Deloron, and F. Peyron . 2012. Congenital parasitic infections: a review. Acta Trop. 121:55-70.
6. Drayman, N., Y. Glick, O. Ben-nun Shaul, H. Zer, A. Zlotnick, D. Gerber, O. Schueler-Furman, and A. Oppenheim . 2013. Pathogens use structural mimicry of native host ligands as a mechanism for host receptor engagement. Cell Host Microbe 14:63-73.
7. Evans, M. L., M. Dionne, K. M. Miller, and L. Bernatchez . 2012. Mate choice for major histocompatibility complex genetic divergence as a bet-hedging strategy in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 279:379-386.
8. Fowler, M. G., R. J. Simonds, and A. Roongpisuthipong . 2000. Update on perinatal HIV transmission. Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 47:21-38.
9. Frank, S. A. 2002. Immunology and the evolution of infectious diseases. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
10. Greenspoon, P. B., and L. K. M'Gonigle . 2013. The evolution of mutation rate in an antagonistic coevolutionary model with maternal transmission of parasites. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 280:1-9.
11. Howard, R. S., and C. M. Lively . 2003. Opposites attract? Mate choice for parasite evasion and the evolutionary stability of sex. J. Evol. Biol. 16:681-689.
12. Howard, R. S., and C. M. Lively . 2004. Good vs complementary genes for parasite resistance and the evolution of mate choice. BMC Evol. Biol. 4: 1-7.
13. Huchard, E., A. Baniel, S. Schliehe-Diecks, and P. M. Kappeler . 2013. MHC-disassortative mate choice and inbreeding avoidance in a solitary primate. Mol. Ecol. 22:4071-4086.
14. Knell, R. J., and K. M. Webberley . 2004. Sexually transmitted diseases of insects: distribution, evolution, ecology and host behaviour. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 79:557-581.
15. Kubinak, J. L., A. C. Nelson, J. S. Ruff, and W. K. Potts . 2012. Trade-offs limiting MHC heterozygosity. Pp. 225-258, ch. 7, in Gregory Demas and Randy Nelson, eds. Ecoimmunology. Oxford Univ. Press, New York City.
16. Kurtz, J., M. Kalbe, P. B. Aeschlimann, M. A. Häberli, K. M. Wegner, T. B. H. Reusch, and M. Milinski . 2004. Major histocompatibility complex diversity influences parasite resistance and innate immunity in sticklebacks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:197-204.
17. Løvlie, H., M. A. F. Gillingham, K. Worley, T. Pizzari, and D. S. Richardson . 2013. Cryptic female choice favours sperm from major histocompatibility complex-dissimilar males. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 280: 1-9.
18. Matthews, B., L. J. Harmon, L. K. M'Gonigle, K. B. Marchinko, and H. Schaschl . 2010. Sympatric and allopatric divergence of MHC genes in threespine stickleback. PloS One 5:e10948.
19. M'Gonigle, L. K., J. J. Shen, and S. P. Otto . 2009. Mutating away from your enemies: the evolution of mutation rate in a host-parasite system. Theor. Popul. Biol. 75:301-311.
20. Milinski, M. 2006. The major histocompatibility complex, sexual selection, and mate choice. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37:159-186.
21. Nee, S. 1989. Antagonistic co-evolution and the evolution of genotypic randomization. J. Theor. Biol. 140:499-518.
22. Nuismer, S. L., S. P. Otto, and F. Blanquart . 2008. When do host-parasite interactions drive the evolution of non-random mating? Ecol. Lett. 11:937-946.
23. Otto, S. P., M. R. Servedio, and S. L. Nuismer . 2008. Frequency-dependent selection and the evolution of assortative mating. Genetics 179:2091-2112.
24. Pearce, D. A. 1998. PCR as a tool for the investigation of seed-borne disease. Pp. 309-324 in P. D.Bridge, D. K. Arora, C. A. Reddy, and R. P. Elander, eds. Applications of PCR in mycology. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
25. Wegner, K. M., B. H. Reusch, and M. Kalbe . 2003. Multiple parasites are driving major histocompatibility complex polymorphism in the wild. J. Evol. Biol. 16:224-232.
26. Woelfing, B., A. Traulsen, M. Milinski, and T. Boehm . 2009. Does intra-individual major histocompatibility complex diversity keep a golden mean? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 364:117-128.