Evaluation of toxic endpoints for a set of cosmetic ingredients with CAESAR models

Chemosphere

Volumn 120, Issue , 2015, Pages 492-499

  Plošnik, Alja ^a   Zupan, Jure ^a   Vračko, Marjan ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

CAESAR models; Classification of chemicals; Cosmetic ingredients; QSAR

Indexed keywords

CHEMICALS; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; CONFORMAL MAPPING; COSMETICS; SELF ORGANIZING MAPS; SOFTWARE PACKAGES;

COMPREHENSIVE INFORMATION; COSMETIC INGREDIENTS; DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY; MUTAGENICITY; PROGRAM PACKAGES; QSAR; SKIN SENSITIZATION; TRAINING SETS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; BUFFER; COLORING AGENT; COSMETIC; EMOLLIENT AGENT; EMULSIFYING AGENT; FRAGRANCE; HAIR DYE; OXIDIZING AGENT; PERFUME; PLASTICIZER; SURFACTANT; CARCINOGEN; HAPTEN; MUTAGENIC AGENT;

CHEMICAL COMPOUND; CHEMICAL PROPERTY; CLASSIFICATION; DRUG; TOXICITY TEST;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CARCINOGENICITY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CLASSIFICATION; DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY; MUTAGENICITY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; SKIN SENSITIVITY; DRUG EFFECTS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CARCINOGENS; COSMETICS; GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT; HAPTENS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MUTAGENS;

EID: 84912118647     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: 18791298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.013     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anzali S., Berthold M.R., Fioravanzo E., Neagu D., Pery A.R.R., Worth A.P., Yang C., Cronin M.T.D., Riharz A.-N. Development of computational models for the risk assessment of cosmetic ingredients. IFSCC Mag. 2012, 4:249-255.
2. Arena V.C., Sussman N.B., Mazumdar S., Yu S., Macina O.T. The utility of Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR) models for prediction and covariate selection in developmental toxicity: comparative analysis of logistic regression and decision tree models. SAR & QSAR Environ. Res. 2004, 15:1-18.
3. Benfenati E. The CAESAR project for in silico models for the REACH legislation. Chem. Cent. J. 2010, 4(Suppl. 1):I1.
4. Benfenati E., Benigni R., DeMarini D.M. Predictive models for carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: frameworks, state-of-the-art, and perspectives. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part C 2009, 27:57-90.
5. Bolcic-Tavcar M., Vracko M. Prediction of mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, developmental toxicity, and skin sensitization with CAESAR program for a set of conazoles. Arch. Ind. Hygiene Toxicol. 2012, 63:283-292.
6. CAESAR project. <>. http://www.caesar.-project.eu.
7. Cassano A., Manganaro A., Martin T., Young D., Piclin N., Pintore M., Bigoni D., Benfenati E. CAESAR models for developmental toxicity. Chem. Cent. J. 2010, 4(Suppl. 1):S4.
8. Chaudhry Q., Piclin N., Cotterill J., Pintore M., Price N.R., Cretien J.R., Roncaglioni A. Global QSAR models for skin sensitisers for regulatory purposes. Chem. Cent. J. 2010, 4(Suppl. 1):S5.
9. Ferrari T., Gini G. An open source multistep model to predict mutagenicity from statistical analysis and relevant structural alerts. Chem. Cent. J. 2010, 4(Suppl. 1):S2.
10. Fjodorova N., Vračko M., Novič M., Roncaglioni A., Benfenati E. New public QSAR model for carcinogenicity. Chem. Cent. J. 2010, 4(Suppl. 1):S3.
11. Gerberick G.F., Ryan C.A., Kern P.S., Schaltter H., Dearman R.J., Kimber I., Patlewicz G.Y., Basketter D.A. Compilation of historical local node data for evaluation of skin sensitization alternative methods. Dermatitis 2005, 16:157-202.
12. Guidance document on the validation of (Q)SAR models. Paris, France: OECD. Health and Safety Publications. Series on Testing and Assessment, 2007, p. 69.
13. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, European Chemicals Agency, 2008.
14. Jezierska A., Vračko M., Basak S.C. Counter-propagation artificial neural network as a tool for the independent variable selection: structure-mutagenicity study on aromatic amines. Mol. Diversity 2004, 8:371-377.
15. Kazius J., Mcguire R., Bursi R. Derivation and validation of toxicophores for mutagenicity prediction. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48:312-320.
16. Kuzmanovski I., Novič M. Counter-propagation neural networks in Matlab. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2008, 90:84-91.
17. Lombardo A., Roncaglioni A., Boriani E., Milan C., Benfenati E. Assessment and validation of the CAEASAR predictive model for bioconcentration factor (BCF) in fish. Chem. Cent. J. 2010, 4(Suppl. 1):S1.
18. Nendza M., Gabbert S., Kuhne R., Lombardo A., Roncaglioni A., Benfenati E., Benigni R., Bossa C., Strempel S., Scheringer M., Fernandez A., Rallo R., Giralt F., Dimitrov S., Mekenyan O., Bringezu F., Schuurmann G. A comparative survey of chemistry-driven in silico methods to identify hazardous substances under REACH. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 66:301-314.
19. Practical Guide 6. How to report read-across and categories. European Chemicals Agency, 2012.
20. REACH legislation. <>. http://www.reachlegislation.com/.
21. Vračko M. Kohonen artificial neural network and counter propagation neural network in molecular structure-activity studies. Curr. Comput.-Aided Drug Des. 2005, 1:73-78.
22. Vračko M., Bobst S. Performance evaluation of CAESAR-QSAR output using PAHs as a case study. J. Chemom. 2014, 28:100-107.
23. Vračko M., Bandelj V., Barbieri P., Benfenati E., Chaudhry Q., Cronin M.T.D., Devillers J., Gallegos A., Gini G., Gramatica P., Helma C., Mazzatorta P., Neagu D., Netzeva T., Pavan M., Patlewicz G., Randic M., Tsakovska I., Worth A.P. Validation of counter propagation neural network models for predictive toxicology according to the OECD principles: a case study. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2006, 17:265-284.