CAESAR models for developmental toxicity

Chemistry Central Journal

Volumn 4, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2010, Pages

  Cassano, Antonio ^a   Manganaro, Alberto ^a   Martin, Todd ^b   Young, Douglas ^b   Piclin, Nadège ^c   Pintore, Marco ^c   Bigoni, Davide ^d   Benfenati, Emilio ^a  

^a MARIO NEGRI INSTITUTE FOR PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Italy)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^c BioChemics Consulting   (France)

^d Consulting Software Engineer ^*  (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955379604     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1752153X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-4-S1-S4     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Quigley D, Simmons F, Whyte H, Robertson J, Freshwater D. Variations in reproductive and developmental toxicant identification. J Chem Health Saf 2010, 17:29-53.
2. Van der Jagt K, Munn S, Tørsløv J, De Bruijn J. Alternative approaches can reduce the use of test animals under REACH. Addendum to the report "Assessment of additional testing needs under REACH. Effects of (Q)SARS, risk based testing and voluntaryindustry initiatives" 2004,
3. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. OJ L 396, 30.12.2006. 1-849.
4. CAESAR Computer Assisted Evaluation of industrial chemical Substances According to Regulations. EC project 022674 (SSPI). CAESAR., http://www.caesar-project.eu
5. Arena VC, Sussman NB, Mazumdar S, Yu S, Macina OT. The utility of structure-activity relationship (SAR) models for prediction and covariate selection in developmental toxicity: comparative analysis of logistic regression and decision tree models. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2004, 15:1-18.
6. Briggs GG, Freeman RK, Yaffe SJ. Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation 1990, Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkens, 3.
7. Shepard TH. Catalog of Teratologic Agents 1992, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 5.
8. OECD Guidance document on the validation of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships [(Q)SAR] models. OECD., http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/55/35/38130292.pdf
9. ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals. ECHA., http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r6_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08
10. Matthews EJ, Kruhlak NL, Benz RD, Ivanov J, Klopma G, Contrera JF. A comprehensive model for reproductive and developmental toxicity hazard identification: II. Construction of QSAR models to predict activities of untested chemicals. Regul Toxicol Pharm 2006, 47:136-155.
11. Sussman NB, Arena VC, Yu S, Mazumdar S, Thampatty BP. Decision tree SAR models for developmental toxicity based on an FDA/TERIS database. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2003, 14:83-96.
12. Gomba VK, Enslein K, Blake BW. Assessment of developmental toxicity potential of chemicals by quantitative structure-toxicity relationship models. Chemosphere 1995, 31:2499-2510.
13. Benfenati E. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) for Pesticide Regulatory Purposes 2007, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.
14. Daylight SMILES: Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System. , http://www.daylight.com/smiles
15. Bender A, Jenkins JL, Scheiber J, Sukuru SC, Glick M, Davies JW. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space. J Chem Inf Model 2009, 49:108-19.
16. Talete srl, DRAGON for Linux (Software for Molecular Descriptor Calculations) Version 1.4, 2009. , http://www.talete.mi.it/
17. Daylight Fingerprint: Screening and Similarity. , http://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.finger.html
18. Willett P. Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints. Drug Discovery Today 2006, 11:1046-1053.
19. Ghanooni M, Mattison DR, Zhang YP, Macina OT, Rosenkranz HS, Klopman G. Structural determinants associated with risk of human developmental toxicity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997, 176:799-806.
20. Todeschini R, Consonni V. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors 2000, Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
21. ChemBioFinder.com: Scientific Database Gateway. , http://chemfinder.camsoft.com/chembiofinder/Forms/Home/ContentArea/Home.aspx
22. ChemIDplus Advanced. , http://chem.sis.nlm.nih.gov/chemidplus/
23. Schüürmann G, Kühne R, Kleint F, Ebert RU, Rothenbacher C, Herth P. A software system for automatic chemical property estimation from molecular structure. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships in Environmental Sciences 1997, 93-114. VII. Pensacola, FL: SETAC Press, Chen F, Schüürmann G.
24. Schüürmann G, Ebert RU, Nendza M, Dearden LC, Paschke A, Kühne R. Prediction of fate-related compound properties. Risk Assessment of Chemicals. An Introduction 2007, 375-426. Dordrecht, NL: Springer Science, van Leeuwen K, Vermeire T.
25. Roy PP, Leonard JT, Roy K. Exploring the impact of size of training sets for the development of predictive QSAR models. Chemomet Intell Lab 2008, 90:31-42.
26. Tong W, Xie Q, Hong H, Shi L, Fang H, Perkins R. Assessment of Prediction Confidence and Domain Extrapolation of Two Structure-Activity Relationship Models for Predicting Estrogen Receptor Binding Activity. Environ Health Persp 2004, 112:1249-1254.
27. USEPA, T.E.S.T. (Toxicity Estimation Software Tool). 2010, , http://www.epa.gov/ORD/NRMRL/std/cppb/qsar/index.html
28. MDL QSAR version 2.2.2.0.7, MDL Information Systems Inc., San Leandro, CA
29. Weka Weka 3 - Data Mining with Open Source Machine Learning Software in Java. Weka., http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka
30. Müller JA, Lemke F. Self-Organising Data Mining. Extracting Knowledge From Data 2000, Hamburg: BoD.
31. Farlow SJ. Self-organizing Methods in Modeling: GMDH-Type Algorithms 1984, New York: Marcel Dekker.
32. Kinnear KE. Advances in Genetic Programming 1994, Cambrige: MIT Press.
33. Haupt RL, Haupt SE. Pratical Genetic Algorithms 1999, New York: Wiley.
34. Ros F, Pintore M, Chretien JR. Molecular description selection combining genetic algorithms and fuzzy logic: application to database mining procedures. Chemomet Intell Lab 2002, 63:15-26.
35. Leardi R, Gonzales AL. Genetic algorithm applied to feature selection in PLS regression: how and when to use them. Chemomet Intell Lab 1998, 41:195-207.
36. Breiman L. Random Forests. Mach Learn 2001, 45:5-32.
37. Quinlan R. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning 1993, San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
38. Ros F, Taboureau O, Pintore M, Chretien JR. Development of CNS predictive models by Adaptive Fuzzy Partitioning. Chemomet Intell Lab 2003, 67:29-50.
39. Lin Y, Cunningham GJ. Building a textitFuzzy System from Input-Output Data. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 1994, 2:243-250.
40. Pintore M, Taboureau O, Ros F, Chretien JR. Database mining applied to central nervous system (CNS) activity. Eur J Med Chem 2001, 36:349-359.
41. Pintore M, van der Waterbeemd H, Piclin N, Chretien JR. Prediction of oral bioavailability by adaptive fuzzy partitioning. Eur J Med Chem 2003, 38:427-431.
42. Pintore M, Piclin N, Benfenati E, Gini G, Chretien JR. Predicting toxicity against the fathead minnow by Adaptive a Fuzzy Partition. QSAR Comb Sci 2003, 22:210-219.
43. Pintore M, Piclin N, Benfenati E, Gini G, Chretien JR. Database mining with adaptive fuzzy partition (AFP): Application to the prediction of pesticide toxicity on rats. Environ Toxicol Chem 2003, 22:983-991.
44. Piclin N, Pintore M, Wechman C, Chretien JR. Classification of a large anticancer data set by Adaptive Fuzzy Partition. J Comput Aid Mol Des 2004, 18:577-586.
45. Pintore M, Audouze K, Ros F, Chretien JR. Adaptive Fuzzy Partition in data base mining: application to olfaction. Data Science J 2002, 1:99-110.
46. Piclin N, Pintore M, Wechman C, Roncaglioni A, Benfenati E, Chretien JR. Ecotoxicity prediction by adaptive fuzzy partitioning: comparing descriptors computed on 2D and 3D structures. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2006, 17:225-251.
47. Sugeno M, Yasakawa T. A fuzzy logic based approach to qualitative modeling. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 1993, 1:7-31.
48. Dubois D, Prade H. An introduction to possibilistic and fuzzy logics. Readings in Uncertain reasoning. San Francisco, USA 1990, 742-761. Shafer G, Pearl J, Kaufmann M.
49. Gupta MM, Qi J. Theory of T-norms and fuzzy inference methods. Fuzzy Set Syst 1991, 40:431-450.