Cell blocks in cytopathology: A review of preparative methods, utility in diagnosis and role in ancillary studies

Cytopathology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 356-371

  Jain, D ^a   Mathur, S R ^a   Iyer, V K ^a  

^a ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Cell block; Cytological techniques; Cytopathology; Diagnostic utility; Immunocytochemistry; Molecular diagnosis

Indexed keywords

AGAR; ALCOHOL; FIXATIVE; FORMALDEHYDE; PYROXYLIN; SODIUM CHLORIDE; THROMBIN;

CELL BLOCK; CYTODIAGNOSIS; CYTOPATHOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EMBEDDING; HUMAN; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; MICROWAVE RADIATION; NEEDLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCEDURES CONCERNING CELLS; REVIEW; THROMBIN TIME; FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; CYTODIAGNOSIS; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; PATHOLOGY, MOLECULAR;

EID: 84912042762     PISSN: 09565507     EISSN: 13652303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12174     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. Bahrenberg L. On the diagnostic results of the microscopical examination of the ascitic fluid in two cases of carcinoma involving the peritoneum. Cleveland Med Gaz 1896;11:274-8.
2. Chapman C, Whalen E. The examination of serous fluids by cell block technique. N Engl J Med 1947;237:215-20.
3. Karnauchow PN, Bonin RE. "Cell-block" technique for fine needle aspiration biopsy. J Clin Pathol 1982;35:688.
4. Burt AD, Smillie D, Cowan MD, Adams FG. Fine needle aspiration cytology: experience with a cell block technique. J Clin Pathol 1986;39:114-15.
5. Yang GC, Wan LS, Papellas J, Waisman J. Compact cell blocks. Use for body fluids, fine needle aspirations and endometrial brush biopsies. Acta Cytol 1998;42:703-6.
6. Dekker A, Bupp PA. Cytology of serous effusions. An investigation into the usefulness of cell blocks versus smears. Am J Clin Pathol 1978;70:855-60.
7. Keyhani-Rofagha S, Vesey-Shecket M. Diagnostic value, feasibility, and validity of preparing cell blocks from fluid-based gynecologic cytology specimens. Cancer 2002;96:204-9.
8. Jing X, Li QK, Bedrossian U, Michael CW. Morphologic and immunocytochemical performances of effusion cell blocks prepared using 3 different methods. Am J Clin Pathol 2013;139:177-82.
9. Keyhani-Rofahga S, O'Toole RV, Leming M. The role of cell block in fine-needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 1984;28:630-1.
10. Fetsch PA, Simsir A, Brosky K, Abati A. Comparison of three commonly used cytologic preparations in effusion immunocytochemistry. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;26:61-6.
11. Billah S, Stewart J, Staerkel G et al. EGFR and KRAS mutations in lung carcinoma: molecular testing by using cytology specimens. Cancer Cytopathol 2011;119:111-17.
12. Young NA, Naryshkin S, Katz SM. Diagnostic value of electron microscopy on paraffin-embedded cytologic material. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:282-90.
13. Knoepp SM, Roh MH. Ancillary techniques on direct-smear aspirate slides: a significant evolution for cytopathology techniques. Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:120-8.
14. Yeoh GPS, Chan KW. Cell block preparation on residual ThinPrep sample. Diagn Cytopathol 1999;21:427-31.
15. Kopelman Y, Marmor S, Ashkenazi I, Fireman Z. Value of EUS-FNA cytological preparations compared with cell block sections in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumours. Cytopathology 2011;22:174-8.
16. Nigro K, Tynski Z, Wasman J, Abdul-Karim F, Wang N. Comparison of cell block preparation methods for nongynecologic Thin Prep specimens. Diagn Cytopathol 2007;35:640-3.
17. Liu K, Dodge R, Glasgow BJ, Layfield LJ. Fine-needle aspiration: comparison of smear, cytospin, and cell block preparations in diagnostic and cost effectiveness. Diagn Cytopathol 1998;19:70-4.
18. Nathan NA, Narayan E, Smith MM, Horn MJ. Cell block cytology. Improved preparation and its efficacy in diagnostic cytology. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;114:599-606.
19. Kern WM, Haber M. Fine-needle aspiration minibiopsies. Acta Cytol 1986;30:403-8.
20. Calabretto ML, Giol L, Sulfaro S. Diagnostic utility of cellblock from bronchial washing in pulmonary neoplasms. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;15:191-2.
21. Flint A. Detection of pulmonary neoplasms by bronchial washings. Are cell blocks a diagnostic aid? Acta Cytol 1993;37:21-3.
22. Collins GR, Thomas J, Joshi N, Zhang S. The diagnostic value of cell block as an adjunct to liquid-based cytology of bronchial washing specimens in the diagnosis and subclassification of pulmonary neoplasms. Cancer Cytopathol 2012;120:134-41.
23. Naylor B. Pleural, peritoneal and pericardial fluids. In: Comprehensive Cytopathology. Bibbo M (ed). Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1991: pp. 541-4.
24. Mao YY, Yang M, Liu DG et al. Evaluation of immunohistochemistry staining and cytologic diagnosis by using cell block sections prepared with effusion fluid cytology specimens. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 2009;38:547-50.
25. Ikeda K, Tate G, Suzuki T, Kitamura T, Mitsuya T. Diagnostic usefulness of EMA, IMP3, and GLUT-1 for the immunocytochemical distinction of malignant cells from reactive mesothelial cells in effusion cytology using cytospin preparations. Diagn Cytopathol 2011;39:395-401.
26. Smith GD, Chadwick BE, Adler DG, Bentz JS. Comparison of ThinPrep UroCyte and cytospin slide preparations for gastrointestinal specimens: evaluation and retrospective performance review. Diagn Cytopathol 2010;38:902-12.
27. Chandra A, Cross P, Denton K et al. The BSCC code of practice - exfoliative cytopathology (excluding gynaecological cytopathology). Cytopathology 2009;20:211-23.
28. Olson NJ, Gogel HK, Williams WL, Mettler FA Jr. Processing of aspiration cytology samples. An alternative method. Acta Cytol 1986;30:409-12.
29. Zito FA, Gadaleta CD, Salvatore C et al. A modified cell block technique for fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 1995;39:93-9.
30. Rosell A, Monso E, Lores L et al. Cytology of bronchial biopsy rinse fluid to improve the diagnostic yield for lung cancer. Eur Respir J 1998;12:1415-18.
31. Yung RC, Otell S, Illei P et al. Improvement of cellularity on cell block preparations using the so-called tissue coagulum clot method during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine-needle aspiration. Cancer Cytopathol 2012;120:185-95.
32. Bellizzi AM, Stelow EB. Pancreatic cytopathology: a practical approach and review. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009;133:388-404.
33. Khurana U, Handa U, Mohan H, Sachdev A. Evaluation of aspiration cytology of the liver space occupying lesions by simultaneous examination of smears and cell blocks. Diagn Cytopathol 2009;37:557-63.
34. Kulkarni MB, Desai SB, Ajit D, Chinoy RF. Utility of the thromboplastin-plasma cell-block technique for fine-needle aspiration and serous effusions. Diagn Cytopathol 2009;37:86-90.
35. De Girolami E. Applications of plasma-thrombin cell block in diagnostic cytology, Part II: II: digestive and respiratory tracts, breast and effusions. Pathol Annu 1977;12(Pt 2):91-110.
36. Henwood AF, Charlton A. Extraneous epithelial cells from thromboplastin in cell blocks. Cytopathology 2014; doi: 10.1111/cyt.12129. [Epub ahead of print].
37. Smedts F, Schrik M, Horn T, Hopman AH. Diagnostic value of processing cytologic aspirates of renal tumors in agar cell (tissue) blocks. Acta Cytol 2010;54:587-94.
38. Kerstens HM, Robben JC, Poddighe PJ et al. AgarCyto: a novel cell-processing method for multiple molecular diagnostic analyses of the uterine cervix. J Histochem Cytochem 2000;48:709-18.
39. Varsegi GM, Shidham V. Cell block preparation from cytology specimen with predominance of individually scattered cells. J Vis Exp 2009;pii:1316.
40. Koss LG. Diagnostic Cytology and its Histopathologic Bases, 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 1979: pp. 1210-11.
41. Fahey C, Bedrosian UK. Collodion bag: a cell block technique for enhanced cell collection. Lab Med 1993;74:94-6.
42. He QL, Zhu YZ, Zheng GJ et al. A new convenient technique for making cell blocks. Cell Tissue Res 2012;350:395-400.
43. Noda Y, Fujita N, Kobayashi G et al. Diagnostic efficacy of the cell block method in comparison with smear cytology of tissue samples obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. J Gastroenterol 2010;45:868-75.
44. Mayall FG. An FNA cytology foam core device for making cell blocks. J Clin Pathol 2012;65:959-61.
45. Krogerus LA, Andersson LC. A simple method for the preparation of paraffin-embedded cell blocks from fine needle aspirates, effusions and brushings. Acta Cytol 1988;32:585-7.
46. ™ specimens. Acta Cytol 2011;55:460-6.
47. Khan S, Omar T, Michelow P. Effectiveness of the cell block technique in diagnostic cytopathology. J Cytol 2012;29:177-82.
48. Akalin A, Lu D, Woda B, Moss L, Fischer A. Rapid cell blocks improve accuracy of breast FNAs beyond that provided by conventional cell blocks regardless of immediate adequacy evaluation. Diagn Cytopathol 2008;36:523-9.
49. ™ automated cell block versus traditional cell block preparation: a comparison of morphologic features and immunohistochemical staining. Diagn Cytopathol 2011;39:730-6.
50. Hecht SA, McCormack M. Comparison of three cell block techniques for detection of low frequency abnormal cells. Pathol Lab Med Int 2013;5:1-7.
51. Boon ME. The Cellient system for paraffin histology can be combined with HPV testing and morphotyping the vaginal microbiome thanks to boon fixing. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013;2013:502357.
52. Xing W, Hou AY, Fischer A, Owens CL, Jiang Z. The Cellient automated cell block system is useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells in Papanicolaou tests. Cancer Cytopathol 2014;122:8-14.
53. van Hemel BM, Suurmeijer AJ. Effective application of the methanol-based PreservCyt(™) fixative and the Cellient(™) automated cell block processor to diagnostic cytopathology, immunocytochemistry, and molecular biology. Diagn Cytopathol 2013;41:734-41.
54. Gorman BK, Kosarac O, Chakraborty S, Schwartz MR, Mody DR. Comparison of breast carcinoma prognostic/predictive biomarkers on cell blocks obtained by various methods: Cellient, formalin and thrombin. Acta Cytol 2012;56:289-96.
55. ™ cytoblocks: better, stronger, faster? Cytopathology 2014; doi: 10.1111/cyt.12159 [Epub ahead of print].
56. Mayall F, Darlington A. The poor man's cell block. J Clin Pathol 2010;63:837-8.
57. Srinivasan M, Sedmak D, Jewell S. Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids. Am J Pathol 2002;161:1961-71.
58. Bramwell NH, Burns BF. The effects of fixative type and fixation time on the quantity and quality of extractable DNA for hybridization studies on lymphoid tissue. Exp Hematol 1988;16:730-2.
59. Gangane N, Mukerji MS, Anshu, Sharma SM. Utility of microwave processed cell blocks as a complement to cervico-vaginal smears. Diagn Cytopathol 2007;35:338-41.
60. Kinsella MD, Birdsong GG, Siddiqui MT, Cohen C, Hanley KZ. Immunohistochemical detection of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in formalin-fixed breast carcinoma cell block preparations: correlation of results to corresponding tissue block (needle core and excision) samples. Diagn Cytopathol 2013;41:192-8.
61. Serth J, Kuczyk MA, Paeslack U, Lichtinghagen R, Jonas U. Quantitation of DNA extracted after micropreparation of cells from frozen and formalin-fixed tissue sections. Am J Pathol 2000;156:1189-96.
62. Kok LP, Boon ME, Ouwerkerk-Noordam E, Gerrits PO. The application of a microwave technique for the preparation of cell blocks from sputum. J Microsc 1986;144(Pt 2):193-9.
63. Arora R, Agarwal S, Mathur SR et al. Utility of a limited panel of calretinin and Ber-EP4 immunocytochemistry on cytospin preparation of serous effusions: a cost-effective measure in resource-limited settings. CytoJournal 2011;8:14.
64. Stigt JA, tHart NA, Knol AJ, Uil SM, Groen HJ. Pyrosequencing analysis of EGFR and KRAS mutations in EUS and EBUS-derived cytologic samples of adenocarcinomas of the lung. J Thorac Oncol 2013;8:1012-18.
65. Young G, Wang K, He J et al. Clinical next-generation sequencing successfully applied to fine-needle aspirations of pulmonary and pancreatic neoplasms. Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:688-94.
66. Aisner DL, Sams SB. The role of cytology specimens in molecular testing of solid tumors: techniques, limitations, and opportunities. Diagn Cytopathol 2012;40:511-24.
67. Shidham VB, Atkinson BF. Immunocytochemistry of effusion fluids: introduction to SCIP approach (Chapter 5). In: Cytopathologic Diagnosis of Serous Fluids, Shidham VB, Atkinson BF (eds). Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2007: pp. 55-78.
68. Diaz-Rosario L, Kabawat SE. Cell block preparation by inverted filter sedimentation is useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in Thin Prep specimens. Cancer 2000;90:265-72.
69. Kyroudi A, Paefthimiou M, Symiakaki H et al. Increasing diagnostic accuracy with a cell block preparation from thin-layer endometrial cytology: a feasibility study. Acta Cytol 2006;50:63-9.
70. Freitas C, Milanezi F, Dias AJ, Bento MJ, Schmitt FC. Use of cell block preparation for morphological, immunocytochemistry, and ploidy analysis in ThinPrep monolayer preparations. Diagn Cytopathol 2001;25:415-17.
71. Akpolat I, Smith DA, Ramzy I, Chirala M, Mody DR. The utility of p16INK4a and Ki-67 staining on cell blocks prepared from residual thin-layer cervicovaginal material. Cancer 2004;102:142-9.
72. Liu H, Shi J, Wilkerson M et al. Immunohistochemical detection of p16INK4a in liquid-based cytology specimens on cell block sections. Cancer 2007;111:74-82.
73. Ueda J, Iwata T, Ono M, Takahashi M. Comparison of three cytologic preparation methods and immunocytochemistries to distinguish adenocarcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusion. Diagn Cytopathol 2006;34:6-10.
74. Davidson B. The diagnostic and molecular characterizations of malignant mesothelioma and ovarian/peritoneal serous carcinoma. Cytopathology 2011;22:5-21.
75. Sanchez N, Selvaggi SM. Utility of cell blocks in the diagnosis of thyroid aspirates. Diagn Cytopathol 2006;34:89-92.
76. Saleh HA, Hammoud J, Zakaria R, Khan AZ. Comparison of Thin-Prep and cell block preparation for the evaluation of thyroid epithelial lesions on fine needle aspiration biopsy. CytoJournal 2008;5:3.
77. Fadda G, Rossi ED, Raffaelli M et al. Follicular thyroid neoplasms can be classified as low- and high-risk according to HBME-1 and Galectin-3 expression on liquid-based fine-needle cytology. Eur J Endocrinol 2011;165:447-53.
78. Shabaik A, Lin G, Peterson M et al. Reliability of Her2/neu, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor testing by immunohistochemistry on cell block of FNA and serous effusions from patients with primary and metastatic breast carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2011;39:328-32.
79. Bueno Angela SP, Viero RM, Soares CT. Fine needle aspirate cell blocks are reliable for detection of hormone receptors and HER-2 by immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma. Cytopathology 2013;24:26-32.
80. Williams SL, Birdsong GG, Cohen C, Siddiqui MT. Immunohistochemical detection of estrogen and progesterone receptor and Her2 expression in breast carcinomas: comparison of cell block and tissue block preparations. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2009;2:476-80.
81. Beatty B, Bryant R, Wang W et al. HER-2/neu detection in fine needle aspirates of breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 2004;122:246-55.
82. Loukeris K, Vazquez MF, Sica G et al. Cytological cell blocks: predictors of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma subtypes. Diagn Cytopathol 2012;40:380-7.
83. Righi L, Graziano P, Fornari A et al. Immunohistochemical subtyping of nonsmall cell lung cancer not otherwise specified in fine-needle aspiration cytology: a retrospective study of 103 cases with surgical correlation. Cancer 2011;117:3416-23.
84. Esterbrook G, Anathhanam S, Plant PK. Adequacy of endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration samples in the subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2013;80:30-4.
85. Collins BT. Endobronchial ultrasound fine-needle aspiration biopsy of pulmonary non-small cell carcinoma with subclassification by immunohistochemistry panel. Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:146-54.
86. Wallace WA, Rassl DM. Accuracy of cell typing in nonsmall cell lung cancer by EBUS/EUS-FNA cytological samples. Eur Respir J 2011;38:911-17.
87. Loo PS, Thomas SC, Nicolson MC, Fyfe MN, Kerr KM. Subtyping of undifferentiated non-small cell carcinomas in bronchial biopsy specimens. J Thorac Oncol 2010;5:442-7.
88. Fatima N, Cohen C, Lawson D et al. TTF-1 and Napsin A double stain: a useful marker for diagnosing lung adenocarcinoma on fine-needle aspiration cell blocks. Cancer Cytopathol 2011;119:127-33.
89. Gauchotte G, Vignaud JM, Ménard O et al. A combination of smears and cell block preparations provides high diagnostic accuracy for endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. Virchows Arch 2012;461:505-12.
90. Boldrini L, Gisfredi S, Ursino S et al. Mutational analysis in cytological specimens of advanced lung adenocarcinoma: a sensitive method for molecular diagnosis. J Thorac Oncol 2007;2:1086-90.
91. Smouse JH, Cibas ES, Jänne PA et al. EGFR mutations are detected comparably in cytologic and surgical pathology specimens of nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer 2009;117:67-72.
92. Betz BL, Roh MH, Weigelin HC et al. The application of molecular diagnostic studies interrogating EGFR and KRAS mutations to stained cytologic smears of lung carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:564-71.
93. Mitiushkina NV, Iyevleva AG, Poltoratskiy AN et al. Detection of EGFR mutations and EML4-ALK rearrangements in lung adenocarcinomas using archived cytological slides. Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:370-6.
94. Khode R, Larsen DA, Culbreath BC et al. Comparative study of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation analysis on cytology smears and surgical pathology specimens from primary and metastatic lung carcinomas. Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:361-9.
95. Dacic S. Molecular genetic testing for lung adenocarcinomas: a practical approach to clinically relevant mutations and translocations. J Clin Pathol 2013;66:870-4.
96. Kalhor N, Wistuba II. Perfecting the fine-needle aspirate cell block. Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:109-10.
97. Collins BT, Chen AC, Wang JF, Bernadt CT, Sanati S. Improved laboratory resource utilization and patient care with the use of rapid on-site evaluation for endobronchial ultrasound fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:544-51.
98. Sanz-Santos J, Serra P, Andreo F et al. Contribution of cell blocks obtained through endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration to the diagnosis of lung cancer. BMC Cancer 2012;12:34.
99. Betz BL, Dixon CA, Weigelin HC, Knoepp SM, Roh MH. The use of stained cytologic direct smears for ALK gene rearrangement analysis of lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:489-99.
100. Cai G, Wong R, Chhieng D et al. Identification of EGFR mutation, KRAS mutation, and ALK gene rearrangement in cytological specimens of primary and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:500-7.
101. Rekhtman N, Brandt SM, Sigel CS et al. Suitability of thoracic cytology for new therapeutic paradigms in non-small cell lung carcinoma: high accuracy of tumor subtyping and feasibility of EGFR and KRAS molecular testing. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:451-8.
102. Malapelle U, Bellevicine C, De Luca C et al. EGFR mutations detected on cytology samples by a centralized laboratory reliably predict response to gefitinib in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients. Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:552-60.
103. van Eijk R, Licht J, Schrumpf M et al. Rapid KRAS, EGFR, BRAF and PIK3CA mutation analysis of fine needle aspirates from non-small-cell lung cancer using allele-specific qPCR. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e17791.
104. Idowu MO. Epidermal growth factor receptor in lung cancer: the amazing interplay of molecular testing and cytopathology. Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:540-3.
105. da Cunha Santos G, Liu N, Tsao MS et al. Detection of EGFR and KRAS mutations in fine-needle aspirates stored on Whatman FTA cards: is this the tool for biobanking cytological samples in the molecular era? Cancer Cytopathol 2010;118:450-6.
106. Crapanzano JP, Heymann JJ, Monaco S, Nassar A, Saqi A. The state of cell block variation and satisfaction in the era of molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine. CytoJournal 2014;11:7.
107. Ceyhan K, Kupana SA, Bektaş M et al. The diagnostic value of on-site cytopathological evaluation and cell block preparation in fine-needle aspiration cytology of liver masses. Cytopathology 2006;17:267-74.
108. Wen CH, Su YC, Wang SL, Yang SF, Chai CY. Application of the microarray technique to cell blocks. Acta Cytol 2007;51:42-6.
109. Pu RT, Giordano TJ, Michael CW. Utility of cytology microarray constructed from effusion cell blocks for immunomarker validation. Cancer 2008;114:300-6.