Cytopathology help desk

Cancer Cytopathology

Volumn 121, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 109-110

  Kalhor, Neda ^a   Wistuba, Ignacio I ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EOSIN; FORMALDEHYDE; HEMATOXYLIN; PARAFFIN;

CELL NUCLEUS; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EDITORIAL; EMBEDDING; FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE FUSION; GENE MUTATION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MATERIALS HANDLING; ONCOGENE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SEDIMENTATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CYTODIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; CYTODIAGNOSIS; HUMANS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84876210269     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19346638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21284     Document Type: Editorial

References (13)

1. Bahrenburg LPH. On the diagnostic results of the microscopical examination of the ascitic fluid in two cases of carcinoma involving the peritoneum. Cleveland Med Gaz. 1896;11:274-278.
2. Nigro K, Tynski Z, Wasman J, et al. Comparison of cell block preparation methods for nongynecologic ThinPrep specimens. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35:640-643. (Pubitemid 47530420)
3. Nathan NA, Narayan E, Smith MM, Horn MJ. Cell block cytology. Improved preparation and its efficacy in diagnostic cytology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;114:599-606. (Pubitemid 33044400)
4. Richardson HL, Koss LG, Simon TR. An evaluation of the concomitant use of cytological and histocytological techniques in the recognition of cancer in exfoliated material from various sources. Cancer. 1955;8:948-950.
5. Liu K, Dodge R, Glasgow BJ, Layfield LJ. Fine-needle aspiration: comparison of smear, cytospin and cell block preparations in diagnostic and cost effectiveness. Diagn Cytopathol. 1998;19:70-74. (Pubitemid 28303351)
6. Keyhani-Rofaga S, O'Toole RV, Leming MF. Role of the cell block in fine-needle aspirations. Acta Cytol. 1984;28:630-631.
7. Billah S, Stewart J, Staerkel G, Chen S, Gong Y, Guo M. EGFR and KRAS mutations in lung carcinoma: molecular testing by using cytology specimens. Cancer Cytopathol. 2011;119:111-117.
8. Boldrini L, Gisfredi S, Ursino S, et al. Mutational analysis in cytological specimens of advanced lung adenocarcinoma: a sensitive method for molecular diagnosis. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:1086-1090. (Pubitemid 350307900)
9. Vincek V, Nassiri M, Nadji M, Morales AR. A tissue fixative that protects macromolecules (DNA, RNA, and protein) and histomorphology in clinical samples. Lab Invest. 2003;83:1427-1435. (Pubitemid 37267826)
10. Gümüş M, Cay N, Algin O, et al. Comparison of 21 and 27 gauge needles for determining sample adequacy in the aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012;18:102-105.
11. Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Komaki T, et al. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:384-390.
12. Unver E, Yilmaz A, Aksoy F, et al. Does needle size affect diagnostic yield of transthoracic needle biopsy in malignant pulmonary lesions? Comparison of 18-, 22-and 25-gauge needles in surgical specimens. Respirology. 2006;11:648-651. (Pubitemid 44186274)
13. Killian K, Walker RL, Suuriniemi M, et al. Archival fine-needle aspiration cytopathology (FNAC) samples: untapped resource for clinical molecular profiling. J Mol Diagn. 2010;12:739-745.